Servant Leadership Transformation in Public Service: An Exploratory Case Study of Behavior Change of Civil Servants at Ministry of Culture and Fine Arts of Cambodia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/abacodijournal.2022.20Abstract
This is an exploratory case study of the Ministry of Culture and Fine Arts of Cambodia. Firstly, it identifies problems to understand the characteristics of civil servants, change resistance and their characteristics of Servant Leadership, while suggesting ways to develop civil servants’ commitment towards changes and the impact of organization development intervention on servant leadership dimensions: empowerment, accountability, standing back, courage, authenticity, humility, forgiveness and stewardship. Secondly, behavioral changes of civil servants were measured using ODI. The study uses the Servant Leadership Model by van Dierendonck and Nuijten (2011) for conceptualization of behavioral changes. Research instruments employed both qualitative and quantitative methods to test the hypotheses at the pre- and post-ODI stages. Servant Leadership was the dependent variable tested. Self-interest and Servant Attitude are independent variables that measured the effects on the Servant Leadership characteristics. The study sample consisted of civil servants (n=70). Quantitative data were analyzed by paired sample t-test and multiple regression. Content analysis was used for qualitative data obtained from interviews. The research findings revealed the civil servant problems and public administration bureaucracy problems that influence behavior and attitude of civil servant. Recommendations for changes included (i) change of “I” vs. “Them” attitudes and behaviors and (ii) cultural change from administrator to service provider. Recommendations are to extend the ODI to test whether multiple ODI periods have effects on the hypotheses tested in the study on self-interest and servant attitude.
References
Bennis, W. (2007). The challenges of leadership in the modern world: Introduction to the special issue. American Psychologist, 62(1), 2–5.
Cooperrider, D., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Revolution in Change. Berrett-Koehler.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
Gervedink Nijhuis, C. J. (2008). Impact of culture on curriculum design in Ghana. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York City.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1998). The power of servant-leadership. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Personality and Culture Revisited: Linking Traits and Dimensions of Culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397103259443
Hun, S. (2018). On rectangular strategy for growth, employment, equity and efficiency [In-Person]. Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Cambodia in the First Cabinet Meeting of the Sixth Legislature of the National Assembly.
Kotter, J. P. (2007). Harvard Business Review: Leading Change, Why Transformation Efforts Fail. Free Press.
Kotter, J. P. (1990). Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management. Free Press
Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change. Free Press.
Laub, J. A. (2004). Defining servant leadership: A recommended typology for servant leadership studies. Servant Leadership Research Roundtable Proceedings.
Lin, P. L. (2004). On leadership. School for Adult Learning Women’s Leadership Seminar.
Ministry of Civil Service. (2010). Civil Servants National Handbook. http://www.mcs.gov.kh
Northouse, P. G. (2007). Leadership: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
Spears, L. C. (1995). Introduction: Servant-leadership and the Greenleaf legacy. In L. C. Spears (Ed.), Reflections on leadership: How Robert K. Greenleaf s theory of servant-leadership influenced today’s top management thinkers (pp. 1–14). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
van Dierendonck, D., & Nuijten, I. (2011). The Servant leadership survey: Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(3), 249–267.
