The Effect of Behavioral Intention to Use Hybrid Education: A Case of Chinese Undergraduate Students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examining factors affecting undergraduate painting students' behavioral intention toward hybrid education in three public universities in Chongqing, China. Perceived ease of use (PEOU), perceived usefulness (PU), perceived satisfaction (PS), social influence (SI), performance expectancy (PE), Facilitating conditions (FC), and behavioral intention (BI) were used to develop the conceptual framework of this study. Research design, data, and methods: The researchers used quantitative study to distributing questionnaire to 500 participants, who are undergraduate students in the major of painting. The survey was conducted in three sample techniques which are judgmental sampling, quota sampling and convenience sampling methods. An item-objective congruence (IOC) of content validity and Cronbach's Alpha reliability test with 30 pilot samples were earlier assessed. Statistical analyses involve Confirmatory Factor analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Model (SEM), including model goodness of fit, validity, and reliability. Results: Most hypotheses were supported with the strongest influence between perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, except facilitation conditions which had no significant influence on behavioral intention. Conclusion: The recommends are that administrators in the educational sector of public institutions should emphasize the main contributors to hybrid learning implementation to increase student engagement and learning efficiency.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submitting author warrants that the submission is original and that she/he is the author of the submission together with the named co-authors; to the extend the submission incorporates text passages, figures, data, or other material from the work of others, the submitting author has obtained any necessary permission.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY What does this mean?). This is to get more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for you, the authors.
References
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (2007). Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies?. Decision sciences, 30(2), 361-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological bulletin, 82(2), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076477
Al-Mamary, Y. H., & Shamsuddin, A. (2015). Testing of The Technology Acceptance Model in Context of Yemen. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 268-273.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Chen, H., & Tseng, H. (2012). Factors that influence acceptance of web-based e-learning systems for the in-service education of junior high school teachers in Taiwan. Evaluation and program planning, 35(3), 398-406. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.11.007
Cigdem, H., & Öztürk, M. (2016). Factors Affecting Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use LMS at a Turkish Post-Secondary Vocational School. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 277-295. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl. v17i3.2253
Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of educational research, 53(4), 445-459.
Clark-Carter, D. (2018). Quantitative Psychological Research: The Complete Student's Companion (4th ed.). Routledge Press.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Elkaseh, A. M., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2016). Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness of social media for e-Learning in Libyan Higher Education: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(3), 192-199. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet. 2016.V6.683
Francisco, G., Jorge, G., Oscar Martin, R., & Miquel Angel Motero, A. (2012). Gender differences in E-learning Satisfaction. Computers & Education, 58(1), 283-290.
Gao, L., Vongurai, R., Phothikitti, K., & Kitcharoen, S. (2022). Factors Influencing University Students’ Attitude and Behavioral Intention Towards Online Learning Platform in Chengdu. China. ABAC ODI JOURNAL Vision. Action. Outcome, 9(2), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.14456/abacodijournal.2022.2
Graham, M. A., Stols, G., & Kapp, R. (2020). Teacher Practice and Integration of ICT: Why Are or Aren't South African Teachers Using ICTs in Their Classrooms. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 749-766.
Green, A. G., Tanford, S., & Swift, A. (2018). Determinants of student satisfaction with using instructional technology: the role of active learning. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Education, 30(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2017.1413381
Guritno, S., & Siringoringo, H. (2013). Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Attitude Towards Online Shopping Usefulness Towards Online Airlines Ticket Purchase. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 81(1), 212-216.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Multivariant Data Analysis (6th ed.). Bookman.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
Israel, D. (1992). Determining Sample Size. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service. Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, EDIS.
Jaruwanakul, T. (2021). Key Influencers of Innovative Work Behavior in Leading Thai Property Developers. AU-GSB e-Journal, 14(1), 61-70.
Kitcharoen, K., & Vongurai, R. (2021). Factors Influencing Customer Attitude and Behavioral Intention Towards Consuming Dietary Supplements. AU-GSB E-JOURNAL, 13(2), 94-109. http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/AU-GSB/article/view/5231
Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with Media. Review of educational research, 61(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002179
Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational technology research and development, 42(2), 7-19.
Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16-39.
Lee, Y. (2011). A study on the effect of teaching innovation on learning effectiveness with learning satisfaction as a mediator. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 9(2), 92-101.
Lodico, G., Spaulding, T., & Voegtle, H. (2006). Method in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Mahmood, A., Mahmood, S. T., & Malik, A. B. (2012). A comparative study of student satisfaction level in distance learning and live classroom at higher education level. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 128-136.
Mazman, S., Usluel, Y., & Çevik, V. (2009). Social influence in the adoption process and usage of innovation: Gender differences. International Journal of Behavioral, Cognitive, Educational and Psychological Sciences, 1(4), 229-232.
Mtebe, J., & Raisamo, R. (2014). Challenges and Instructors’ Intention to Adopt and Use Open Educational Resources in Higher Education in Tanzania. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 249-271.
Neo, M., Park, H., Lee, M.-J., Soh, J.-Y., & Oh, J.-Y. (2015). Technology Acceptance of Healthcare E-Learning Modules: A Study of Korean and Malaysian Students' Perceptions. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 181-194.
Netemeyer, R. G., & Bearden, W. O. (1992). A comparative analysis of two models of behavioral intention. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(1), 49-59.
Ong, C. S., & Lai, J. Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816-829.
Pedroso, R., Zanetello, L., Guimaraes, L., Pettenon, M., Goncalves, V., Scherer, J., Kessler, F., & Pechansky, F. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the crack use relapse scale (CURS). Archives of Clinical Psychiatry, 43(3), 37-40.
Pereira, M. A. C., Ignaacio, L. M. N. D. C., & Rodrigues Reis, C. E. (2021). Virtualizing project-based learning: an abrupt adaptation of active learning in the first days of the COVID-19 pandemic with promising outcomes. Sustainability, 14(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010363
Player-Koro, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ use of ICT in education. Education Inquiry, 3(1), 93-108.
Porter, C. E., & Donthu, N. (2006). Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics. Journal of business research, 59(9), 999-1007.
Rienties, B., Giesbers, B., Lygo-Baker, S., Ma, H. W. S., & Rees, R. (2016). Why some teachers easily learn to use a new virtual learning environment: a technology acceptance perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 539-552.
Rojabi, A. R. (2019). Hybrid education via schoology as a learning management system in reading class: benefits and challenges. Jurnal Linguistik Terapan, 9(2), 36-42.
Rui-Hsin, K., & Lin, C. (2018). The Usage Intention of E-Learning for Police Education and Training. Policing an International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 41(1), 98-112.
Salkind, J. (2017). Exploring Research (9th ed.). Pearson Press.
Sharma, G. P., Verma, R. C., & Pathare, P. (2005). Mathematical modeling of infrared radiation thin layer drying of onion slices. Journal of Food Engineering, 71(3), 282-286.
Shin, W. S., & Kang, M. (2015). The use of a mobile learning management system at an online university and its effect on learning satisfaction and achievement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 110-130.
Sica, C., & Ghisi, M. (2007). The Italian versions of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory-II: Psychometric properties and discriminant power. In M.A. Lange (Ed.), Leading - Edge Psychological Tests and Testing Research (pp. 27-50). Nova
Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education, 15, 157-190.
Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432-2440.
Textor, C. (2021, November 29). Number of students at colleges and universities in China 2010-2020. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/227028/number-of-students-at-universities-in-china
Vallerand, R. J., Deshaies, P., Cuerrier, J.-P., Pelletier, L. G., & Mongeau, C. (1992). Ajzen and Fishbein's theory of reasoned action as applied to moral behavior: A confirmatory analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 62(1), 98.
Vatanasakdakul, S., Aoun, C., & Li, Y. (2010). AIS in Australia: UTAUT application and cultural implication. ACIS 2010 Proceedings, 17, 1-11.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2017202
Voß, H., Scholz-Kreisel, P., Richter, C., Ringel, F., Singer, S., & Renovanz, M. (2021). Development Of Screening Questions for Doctor–Patient Consultation Assessing the Quality of Life and Psychosocial Burden of Glioma Patients: An Explorative Study. Quality of Life Research, 4(1), 1513-1522.
Vululleh, P. (2018). Determinants of students’e-learning acceptance in developing countries: An approach based on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 14(1), 141-151.
Wang, Y.-S., Wang, Y.-M., Lin, H.-H., & Tang, T.-I. (2003). Determinants of user acceptance of internet banking: An empirical study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5), 501-519. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230310500192
Warshaw, P., & Davis, F. (1985). Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(3), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(85)90017-4
Wu, J. H., & Wang, Y. M. (2006). Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean’s model. Information and Management, 43(6), 728-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.002
Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155-164. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012