A Montfortian Education Charter Model for the 21st for Students in Schools in the Saint Gabriel's Foundation, Thailand


  • Bro. Kriangsak Mayod Ph.D. Candidate in Educational Administration and Leadership, Graduate School of Human Sciences, Assumption University
  • Nathara Mhunpiew lecturer, Assumption University
  • Verayuth Boonpram Vice President, Assumption University


DOI: 10.14456/abacodijournal.2024.1
Published: 2024-04-24


Montfortian Education Charter Model (MEC), 21st Century for Students


This study aimed to develop and validate 'A Montfortian Education Charter Model (MEC) for the 21st Century for Students in Schools under the Saint Gabriel's Foundation, Thailand.' The researcher utilized both qualitative and quantitative methods to collect data for model development. Qualitative data were derived from document analysis of relevant literature revealing 47 desired characteristics essential for Montfortian students in the 21st Century. These characteristics were systematically categorized into ten dimensions. Quantitative data were collected by distributing a dual-response format questionnaire to a sample of 1904 students enrolled in grades 7-9 across 11 targeted schools under St. Gabriel Foundation, Thailand, during the first semester of 2023. The questionnaire demonstrated a validity index of 1.0 (IOC index) and a high reliability of 0.99 (Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient). The results from the PNImodified identified the need for improvement in developing the Model. The structure of the Model includes ten dimensions and the integration of student formation programs. A 30-hour training session involving 80 experimental students from grades 7-9 was conducted for the model assessment. The experiment indicated a statistically significant increase in the students' intended knowledge at a significance level of 0.01, confirming the efficiency and appropriateness of the Model. This research recommends that school leaders integrate MEC into the 21st-century educational framework at all levels of school administration with genuine commitment and patience. Furthermore, fostering the understanding and appreciation of MEC among school personnel through continuous education is essential for successful implementation. The findings of this study contribute valuable insights for educators and administrators seeking to enhance the educational experience of Montfortian students in the evolving landscape of the 21st Century.

Author Biography

Verayuth Boonpram, Vice President, Assumption University

Vice President for Academic Affairs


Agassi, J. (1995). Why there is no theory of models. In I. Niiniluoto W.E. Herfel, W. Krajewsky & R. Wojcicki (Ed.), Theories and Models in Scientific Processes (pp. 17–26). Amsterdam-Atlanta

Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1999). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational Leadership. United States: Library of Congress.

Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Erlbaum.

Becker, J., & Schutte, R. (2004). Retail Information Systems. In Germany (2nd ed.). Frankfurt.

Blackaby, H. T., & Blackaby, R. (2011). Moving People to God's Agenda: Spiritual Leadership. B&H Publishing Group: Tennessee

Bowman, R. F. (2005). Teacher as Servant Leader. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues, and Ideas, 78(6).

Brothers of Saint Gabriel. (n.d.). Montfortian Education Charter (MEC): Montfort Ian Education for the 21st Century. Green Life Printing House.

Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.

Cumming, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2013). Organization Development and Change (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.001

Greenleaf, R. K. (2003). The Servant Leader within a Transformative Path. Paulist Press.

Keeves, P. J. (1988). Model and Model Building. Educational Research. Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook. Pergamon Press.

Maslow, A. (1964). Religions, Values, and Peak-experiences. Penguin Books.

Maslow, A. (1968). Towards a Psychology of Being. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Nijaneat, C. (2017). Model Development Research in Social Sciences and Education. Suratthani Rajabhat Journal, 4(2), 71-102.

Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The Use of Focus Group Discussion Methodology: Insights from Two Decades of Application in Conversion. British Ecological Society, 9(1), 20-32.

Smith, E. W. (1997). The Education Encyclopedia. Prentice-Hall

Steiner, E. (1988). Methodology Theory Building. Ecological Research

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. John Wiley & Sons.

Wagner, T. (2008). The Global Achievement Gap: Why Even Our Best Schools Don't Teach The New Skills Our Children Need-What Can We Do About It. Basic Books.

Warrilow, S. (2022). Transformational Leadership Theory - The 4 Key Components in Leading Change & Managing Change. http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Stephen_Warrilow

Willer, D. (1968). Scientific Sociology: Theory and method. Prentice–Hall.

Wongvanich, S. (1999). A Synthesis of Needs Assessment Techniques Used in Students' Theses of Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University. Research Paper with the support of Ekkarit Praditsuwan Research Foundation.




How to Cite

Mayod, B. K., Mhunpiew, N., & Boonpram, V. (2024). A Montfortian Education Charter Model for the 21st for Students in Schools in the Saint Gabriel’s Foundation, Thailand. ABAC ODI JOURNAL Vision. Action. Outcome, 11(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.14456/abacodijournal.2024.1

Most read articles by the same author(s)