A Comparative Study Of Students’ Motivation For Learning English As A Foreign Language According To Their Preferences For Indirect Learning Strategies At Nelson English Language Centre, Yangon, Myanmar
Keywords:Motivation, indirect learning strategies, preferences, English language as a foreign language, comparative study, Myanmar
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to examine the difference between the students’ motivation for learning English as a Foreign Language according to their preferences for indirect learning strategies at Nelson English Language Centre in Yangon, Myanmar. This research was designed as a quantitative comparative study. A total of 215 students from Intro, Level 1 and Level 2 at Nelson English Language Centre in Yangon participated in this study research. Data were collected using a survey questionnaire, which was adapted from the international version of Gardner’s Attitude/Motivation Test Battery (AMTB) for motivation and Oxford’s Strategy Inventory for Language Learning questionnaire (SILL) for indirect learning strategies. The collected data were analyzed first through descriptive statistics (i.e., means, standard deviations, frequencies and percentages) and then through inferential statistics (i.e., one-way analysis of variance) for statistical hypothesis testing. The findings indicated that the students’ motivation for learning EFL in Nelson English Language Centre was “High”. Besides, the students preferred metacognitive strategies the most followed by social strategies, mixed strategies and affective strategies. These research findings showed that there was no significant difference between the students’ motivation for learning EFL according to their preferences for indirect learning strategies. The recommendations for teachers, school administrators and future researchers are provided based on the findings of this study.
Bialystok, E. (1978). A theoretical model of second language learning. Language Learning, 28, 69-83.
Chang, C.-h., & Liu, H.-j. (2013). Language learning strategy use and language learning motivation of Taiwanese EFL university students. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(2), 196-209
Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31(3), 117-135.
Gardner, R. (1985). Social pyschology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold Ltd.
Gardner, R. C. (2004). Attitude/motivation test battery: International AMTB research project. Canada: The University of Western Ontario.
Gardner, R. C. (2005). Integrative motivation and second language acquisition. Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics/Canadian Linguistics Association Joint Plenary Talk-May 30, 2005, London, Canada.
Gardner, R. C. (2009). Gardner and Lambert (1959): Fifty years and counting. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics, Ottawa.
Gardner, R. C. (2010). Motivation and second language acquisition: The socio-educational model: New York: Peter Lang
Gardner, R., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). On the measurement of affective variables in second language learning. Language Learning, 43(2), 157-194.
Gholami, R., Allahyar, N., & Rafi, S. (2012). Integrative motivation as an essential determinant of achievement: A case of EFL high school students. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(11), 1416-1424.
Hancock, D. R. (2007). Effects of performance assessment on the achievement and motivation of graduate students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(3), 219-231.
Hnin, O. K. (2017). Comparing English learning of university students in Japan and Myanmar (Unpublished master's thesis). Osaka Jogakuin University, Osaka, Japan.
Kitjaroonchai, N., & Kitjaroonchai, T. (2012). Motivation toward English language learning of Thai students majoring in English at Asia-Pacific International University. Journal of the Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies Journal of the Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies, 7(1), 21- 40.
Lwin, T. (2011). Languages, identities, and education–in relation to Burma/Myanmar. Shan Herald Agency for News, 15.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Oxford, R. L. (1999). Relationships between second language learning strategies and language proficiency in the context of learner autonomy and self-regulation. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 38, 108-126.
Oxford, R. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An Overview. Learning Styles & Strategies/Oxford, GALA 2003.
Oxford, R., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning. System, 23 (2), 153-175.
Park, G.-P. (2011). The validation process of the SILL: A confirmatory factor analysis. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 21-27.
Park, S. (2005). Language learning strategies and the relationship of these strategies to motivation and English proficiency among Korean EFL students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Kansas, USA.
Sein, K. (2015). An overview on the state of English language implementation in Myanmar. English for ASEAN Integration: Policies and Practices in the Region, 97-102.
Ushioda, E., & Dӧrnyei, Z. (2012). Motivation.
Xiao, H., & Lynch, R. (2017). The relationship between the use of indirect language learning strategies and Chinese language achievement in reading and writing among students in years 7 to 10 at Ascot International School in Bangkok, Thailand. Scholar, 9(1) 262-271.
Xu, X. (2011). The relationship between language learning motivation and the choice of language learning strategies among Chinese graduates. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 203-212.