A Comparative Study of Student Academic Achievement and Satisfaction in Grade 4 Science under Traditional Instruction and Cooperative Learning Instruction Methods at Sarasas Witaed Bangbon School, Thailand
Keywords:
Cooperative Learning, Traditional Instruction, Bilingual School, Science, Grade Four, Bangkok, Thailand, Student Satisfaction, Academic AchievementAbstract
The National Education Act of B.E. 2542 (1999) as well as the Basic Education Core Curriculum of 2008 emphasize the importance of both the acquisition of the English language in present Thai society, as well as the development of 21st century skills for all Thai children. Furthermore, the Thai Ministry of Education supports and encourages cooperative learning as a way to create appealing, motivating, and meaningful learning. Unfortunately, this vision is often not shared by schools in Thailand, which prefer a more traditional instructional method. This comparative study aimed at measuring academic achievement as well as student satisfaction under two instructional methods - traditional instruction and cooperative learning instruction. The research was conducted in science grade four at Sarasas Witaed Bangbon School, Bangkok, Thailand. Science as a school subject is ideal for the implementation of cooperative learning. Indeed, science literacy develops critical thinking, analysis, and cooperative skills. A total of 122 students took part in this study over a period of six weeks during the second semester of the school year 2015. The research included six objectives. Objectives one and two were to determine student academic achievement under traditional instruction and cooperative learning instruction methods. Objectives three and four were to determine student satisfaction under traditional instruction and cooperative learning instruction methods. Finally, objectives five and six were to compare the results between the instructional methods in order to determine if an instructional method was more efficient and/or appealing. The findings of this study suggested that academic achievement of the cooperative learning group did not improve significantly. Student satisfaction was higher for the cooperative learning group than the traditional instruction group. Recommendations for school administrators and future researchers are provided.References
Academic Foreign Staff. (2007). Grade 4 Science. Sarasas Affiliated Schools.
Andersen, M. H. (2011, January-February). The world is my school: Welcome to the era of personalized learning. Future learning will become both more social and more personal, says an educational technology expert. The Futurist, 45(1), 12–17.
Assavanonda, A. (20013, December 16). Thailand lagging behind in English. The Nation. Bangkok
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.8.3063&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Beck, R. H. (2009). The Three R's Plus: What Today's Schools are Trying to Do and Why. U of Minnesota Press.
Bureau of the Budget. (2015). Thailand’s Budget in Brief Fiscal Year. Bangkok, Thailand: Aroonkarnpim Ltd., Part. Retrieved from http://www.bb.go.th/budget_book/e-Book2558/PDF/Budget-in-Brief-2015.pdf
Brush, T. A., & Saye, J.W. (2002). A Summary of Research Exploring Hard and Soft Scaffolding for Teachers and Students Using a Multimedia Supported Learning Environment. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1-12.
Cadias, A.M. (2013, August 5). Breaking the Controversies behind Thailand’s “No Fail” Policy.
Cobern, W. W. (1993). Contextual Constructivism: The Impact of Culture on the Learning and Teaching of Science. Hillsadle, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Deerajviset, P. (2014). The ASEAN Community 2015 and English Language Teaching in Thailand. Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 10(2), 39-75.
Digital Content. (2014). Thailand’s educational spending highest in the world. MCOT.net. Retrieved from http://www.mcot.net/site/content?id=52ce01bd150ba0ea6400011f#.VigthH4rKUk
Education First. (2014). EF English Proficiency Index 4th Edition. Retrieved from http://media.ef.com/__/~/media/centralefcom/epi/v4/downloads/full-reports/ef-epi-2014-english.pdf
Gillies, R.M., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education 26, 933-940.
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Hatipoglu V. G. (2013). A Comparative Study on Student Achievement in Science through Cooperative Learning and Individualistic Learning at Nantawan International School. Scholar, Vol 5, No 1, 1-7. Assumption University of Thailand.
Hein, G. E. (1991). Constructivist Learning Theory. The Museum and the Needs of People
CECA (International Committee of Museum Educators) Conference
Jerusalem Israel, 15-22 October 1991 Retrieved from http://www.exploratorium.edu/ifi-archive/resources/constructivistlearning.html
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning Together and Alone (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn anb Bacon A Paramount Communication Company.
Johnson, R., & Johnson, D. (1997, September. 17). Cooperative Learning and Conflict Resolution. Johns Hopkins School of Education. Retrieved from http://education.jhu.edu/PD/newhorizons/strategies/topics/Cooperative%20Learning/cooperative_conflict.html
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. ASHER-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4.Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
Kagan, S. (2000) Kagan, S. Kagan Structures – Not One More Program, a Better Way to Teach Any Program. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Publishing. Kagan Online Magazine, Fall 2000. www.KaganOnline.com
Kasambira, K.P. (1993). Teaching methods: New directions in education. College press.
Lyman, L., & Foyle H.C. (1988). Cooperative Learning Strategies and Children. ERIC Digest. Retrieved from http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/0415306752/resources/pdf/10CooperativeLearningStrategies.pdf
Maxwell, D. (2014, November 21). 28 weeks later: Education reform in Thailand under the junta. Asian Correspondent. Retrieved from http://asiancorrespondent.com/128438/28-weeks-later-education-reform-in-thailand-under-the-junta
McLeod, S. (2010) Zone of proximal development. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/Zone-of-Proximal-Development.html
Ministry of Education Thailand. (2008). The Basic Education Core Curriculum. Retrieved from: http://www.act.ac.th/document/1741.pdf
National Institute for Science Education [NISE]. (1997). What's the difference between collaborative and cooperative learning? National institute for Science Education, College Level One. Retrieved from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/archive/cl1/CL/question/TQ13.htm
Nicholls, P. and Apiwattanakorn, P. (2015).Thailand: Where Culture and the Classroom Collide. The New English Teacher 9.1. Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, Thailand. Retrieved from http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/newEnglishTeacher/article/download/281/710
Office of the National Education Commission [ONEC]. (1999). The National Education Act of B.E. 2542 (1999). Retrieved from: http://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/upload/Thailand/Thailand_Education_Act_1999.pdf
Pacific Policy Research Center. (2010). Successful Bilingual and Immersion Education Models/Programs. Honolulu: Kamehameha Schools, Research & Evaluation Division. Retrieved from http://www.ksbe.edu/_assets/spi/pdfs/Bilingual_Immersion_full.pdf
Parpart, E. (2013, November 22). Economists share views on Thailand's biggest problems. The Nation, Bangkok. Retrieved from http://www.nationmultimedia.com/business/Economists-share-views-on-Thailands-biggest-proble-30220283.html
Parsons, J., & Beauchamp, L. (2012). From Knowledge to Action: Shaping the Future of Curriculum Development in Alberta. Alberta Education Cataloguing in Publication Data.
Partridge, B.J., & Eamoraphan, S. (2015). A Comparative Study on Students’ Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety through Cooperative Learning on Grade 10 Students at Saint Joseph Bangna School, Thailand. Scholar, Vol 7, No 1, 172-185. Assumption University of Thailand.
Perkins, D. (1999). The many Faces of Constructivism. Educational Leadership, 6-11. Retrieved from http://www.wou.edu/~girodm/library/Perkins.pdf
Phungphol, Y. (2005). Learner-Centered Teaching Approach: A Paradigm Shift in Thai Education. ABAC Journal. 25 (2), 5-16. Retrieved from http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/abacjournal/article/view/611/546
Pusawiro, P. (2014, December 29).We need to ask the right questions to get the best solutions: a recap for the future. The Nation, Bangkok. Retrieved from http://www.nationmultimedia.com/opinion/We-need-to-
ask-the-right-questions-to-get-the-best-30250866.html
Putnam, J. (1997). Cooperative learning in Diverse Classrooms. New Jersey Columbus, OH: Merrill, an imprint of Prentice Hall.
Ragupathi, K. (2002). The Learner: How Students Learn - Cooperative and collaborative learning. Retrieved from http://www.cdtl.nus.edu.sg/Handbook/Learn/coop.htm
Ransdell, M. (2003). Using Cooperative Learning in Elementary Science Classroom. The Professional EducatorVolume XXVI • Number 1. Retrieved from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ842388.pdf
Robinson, K. (2008). Conference RS: Changing Paradigms. Retrieved from https://www.thersa.org/discover/videos/event-videos/2008/06/changing-paradigms/
Sarasas Ektra School. (2014). Bilingual Education Baeb Thai (Part One). Retrieved from http://www.ektra.ac.th/ektraWeb/allAcademic/BilingualEducationBaebThai(PartOne)Eng.html
Slavin, R. E. (2012, April 26). Cooperative Learning: Making Groupwork Work. Online Video Clip. Youtube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agTGdOZ6PsE
Stahl, R. J. (1996). Cooperative Learning in Science: A Handbook for Teachers. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
Swan, K. (2005). A constructivist model for thinking about learning online. Needham, MA: Sloan-C. Retrieved from http://ibrarian.net/navon/paper/A_Constructivist_Model_for_Thinking_About_Learnin.pdf?paperid=5558545
Thamraksa, C. (2011). Student-Centered Learning: Demystifying the Myth. Center for Education Reform in Thailand Website. Retrieved from http://sclthailand.org/2011/08/student-centered-learning-demystifying-the-myth/
The Iris Center. (2015). What is differentiated instruction? Vanderbilt University. Retrieved from http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/di/cresource/q1/p01/#content
Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners.Alesendria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved from http://www.mccracken.kyschools.us/Downloads/CarolAnnTomlinson%20Differentiated_Classroom.pdf
UNESCO. (2010). Current Challenges in Basic Science Education. UNESCO Education Sector. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001914/191425e.pdf
Vygostsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~siegler/vygotsky78.pdf and https://books.google.co.th/books?id=RxjjUefze_oC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Walters, L. S. (2000). Putting Cooperative Learning to the Test. Harvard Education Letter. Retrieved from: http://www.leadandlearn.com/sites/default/files/articles/cooplearning.pdf
