A Comparative Study of Student Motivation for Learning Science and Science Achievement in The English and Thai Programs at Mathayomwatsing School in Bangkok, Thailand

Htike Htike Lwin, Suwattana Eamoraphan


The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between
student motivation for learning science and science achievement of 55 mathayom 3 students in the English and Thai Programs at Mathayomwatsing School in Bangkok, Thailand. This study employed a quantitative methodology employing both a questionnaire as well as “O” Net scores to address the research objectives. The study had six objectives which were 1) To determine the level of student motivation for learning science in the English Program at Mathayomwatsing school, in Bangkok, Thailand. 2) To determine the level of student motivation for learning science in the Thai Program at Mathayomwatsing school, Bangkok, Thailand. 3) To find the correlation between student motivation for learning science and science achievement in the English Program at Mathayomwatsing school in Bangkok, Thailand. 4) To find the correlation between student motivation for learning science and science achievement in the Thai Program at Mathayomwatsing school in Bangkok, Thailand. 5) To compare student motivation for learning science between
students in the English and Thai programs at Mathayomwatsing school in Bangkok, Thailand. 6) To compare science achievement between students in the English and Thai programs at Mathayomwatsing school in Bangkok, Thailand. The research
findings were the level of student motivation for learning science in the English and Thai Programs at Mathayomwatsing School in Bangkok, Thailand were “rarely to sometimes” motivated and there was a significant relationship between student motivation for learning and the student science achievement in the English and Thai Programs at Mathayomwatsing School in Bangkok, Thailand. There was no significant difference of student motivation for learning science and science achievement between students in the English and Thai programs at Mathayomwatsing School in Bangkok, Thailand.


Motivation for Learning Science; Science Achievement.

Full Text:



Anderson, A. (2003). Teaching Science for Motivation and Understanding. Retrieved from


Anderson, K. M. (2007). Differentiating Instruction To Include All Students. Preventing school Failure, 51 (3). Retrieved from http://tccl.rit.albany.edu/knilt/images/0/03/Anderson.pdf

Andrew, L. (2007). Comparison of teacher educators’ instructional methods with the Instructional methods with the constructivist ideal. Retrieved from www.teachade.com/resources/support/5035b24f06e3a.doc

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in Cognitive Development, Functioning Educational Psychologist, 28 (2), 117-148. Retrieved from http://www.centerforefficacyandresiliency.org/assets/docs/Perceived%20Self-Efficacy%20in%20Cognitive%20Development%20and%20Functioning.pdf

Bax, S. (2010). Researching English Bilingual Education in Thailand, Indonesia and South Korea, Malaysia: British Council. Malaysia: British Council. Retrieved from http://www.britishcouncil.org/publication_2_researching_english_bilingual_education.pdf

Bordie, M. (2006). Science in school. Promoting science and motivating students in the 21st century. Retrieved from Science in school website:


Breaux, E. & Magee, M. B. (2010). How the best teacher differentiate instruction. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education. Retrieved from

http://www.curriculumpress. edu.au/sample/pages/9781742396255.pdf

Cavas, P. (2011). Factors affecting the motivation of Turkish primary students for Science learning. Science Education International, 22 (1). Retrieved from http://www.icaseonline.net/sei/march2011/p3.pdf

Duit, R. (1996). The constructivist view in science education – what it has to offer and what should not be expected from it. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 1 (1). Retrieved from http://www.if.ufrgs.br/ienci/artigos/Artigo_ID9/v1_n1_a3.pdf

Garbett, D. (2011). Constructivism Deconstructed in Science Teacher Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36 (3). Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1587&context=ajte

Geer, U.C. & Rudge, D.W. (2002). A Review of Research on Constructivist Based Strategies for Large Lecture Classes. Retrieved from http://wolfweb.unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/geer.pdf

Gray, A. (2007). Constructivist Teaching & Learning. Retrieved from SSTA Research Centre Report website: http://www.saskschoolboards.ca/old/ResearchAndDevelopment/ResearchReports/Instruction/97-07.htm

House, D. J. (2002). The motivational effects of specific teaching activities and computer use for science learning: Findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). International Journal of Instructional Media, 29 (4). Retrieved from


Lai, E. R. (2011). Motivation: A Literature Review. Retrieved from http://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/motivation_review_final.pdf

Lorsbach, A. & Tobin, K. (1997). Constructivism as a referent for science teaching Retrieved from Inquiry Education Information for Research Page website:


Mallow, J.V. (2010). Gender, Science Anxiety, and Science Attitudes: A

Multinational Perspective. United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women (DAW, part of un Women). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Retrieved from

http://www.un.org/women watch/daw/egm/gst_2010/Mallow-EP.5-EGMST.pdf

Mathayomwatsing School. English Program. Retrieved from Mathayomwatsing School, English Program website: http://www.ep-watsing.com/

McComb, B. (2013). Developing Responsible and Autonomous Learners: A key to Motivating Students, American Psychological Association. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/education/k12/learners.aspx

Olatoye, R. A. (2009). Students’ test anxiety, motivation for examinations and science Achievement in junior secondary schools in Ogun State, Nigeria.

International Journal of Psychology and Counselling, 1(10), 194-198.

Retrieved from

http://www.academicjournals.org/article/article1380358855_Olatoye%25 20Pdf.pdf

Palmer, C. (n.d.) Inspiring Enthusiasm and Motivation in the Classroom. American Education. Retrieved fromhttp://www.american.edu/soc/faculty/upload/CTRLBuilding-Student-Engagement-Handout.pdf

Renninger, K. A. (2007). Interest and motivation in informal science learning.


Ryan, C. (2009). Current Challenges in Basic Science Education. Retrieved from


Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic motivation: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25,54-67. Retrieved from http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2000_RyanDeci_IntExtDefs.pdf

Schleicher, A. (2010). The case for 21st – century learning. OECD Better Policies for Better Lives. Retrieved from OECD website: http://www.oecd.org/general/thecasefor21st-centurylearning.htm

Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and cognitive achievement: Implications for students with learning problems. Retrieved from http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/D_Schunk_Self-efficacy_1989.pdf

Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-Efficacy & Academic Motivation. Educational

Psychologist, 26, 207-231. Retrieved from http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/d_schunk_self_1991.pdf

Simpson, L. E. (2008). Self Determination in the Classroom. Retrieved from http://www.jamesarts.com/lsimpson/fullthesis.pdf

Staver, J. R. (2007). Teaching Science: International Academy of Education-Educational Practices Series-17. Retrieved from the IBE website:


Stohr-Hunt, P. M. (1996). An analysis of frequency of hands-on experience and science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33 (1), 101-109. Retrieved from


Stronge, J. H. (2007). Chapter 4. Planning and Organizing for Instruction: Qualities of Effective Teachers, 2nd Edition. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved from

http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/105156/ chapters/Planning-and-Organizing-for-Instruction.aspx

Urban, H. (2008). Catholic Education Resource Center. Lesson #1: Good teachers share one special quality. Retrieved from Catholic Education Resource Center website: http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/education/ed0358.htm

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2013). Education: Hands-on Science. Retrieved from United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization website:

http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/ themes/strengthening-educationsystems/science-and-technology/hands-on-science

University of Arkansas. (1993). Wally Cordes Teaching and Faculty Support Center: Motivating students. Retrieved from University of Arkansas website: http://tfsc.uark.edu/174.php

Vosniadou, S. (2001). How Children Learn - International Bureau of Education (UNESCO). Educational Practices Series-7. Bellegarde, France: International Academy of Education or International Bureau of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/publications/educationalpracticesseriespdf/prac07e.pdf

Webb-Williams, J. (2006). Self-efficacy in the primary classroom: An investigation into the the relationship with performance. Retrieved from www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/166271.doc

Yuenyong, C. & Najaikaew, P. (2009). Scientific Literacy and Thailand Science Education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4 (3), 349. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ884401.pdf

Zhao, Y. (2013). Creative, Entrepreneurial, and Global: 21st Century Education. Five Questions to Ask about the Common Core. Retrieved from Yong Zhao Creative, Entrepreneurial, and Global: 21st Century Education website: http://zhaolearning.com/2013/01/02/five-questions-to-ask-about-the-commoncore/


  • There are currently no refbacks.