Leveraging Leadership, Collaboration, and Decision-Making to Improve Team Effectiveness: A Case of Education Gathering Group (EGG) Alumni Network in Kayin State, Myanmar

Main Article Content

Kyaw Khaung Saw
Sirichai Preudhikulpradab

Abstract

This article is survey-based research, comprising of two objectives, 1). to examine the current situations of leadership, collaboration, and decision making to improve team effectiveness of the Education Gathering Group (EGG) Alumni Network in Kayin State, Myanmar, and 2). to propose key developmental opportunities to improve team effectiveness. Research design, data, and methodology: The research site is Kayin State, Myanmar, with a total actual sample of 124 respondents who completed the survey. The instrument employed is a structured questionnaire, which is IOC validated and Cronbach Alpha Co-Efficient tested. The sampling technique is purposive sampling. Data is quantitative and treatments, comprise descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, and Pearson correlation. Key findings indicated that leadership (p=0.00, r=0.479) and decision-making (p=0.00, r=0.408), which indicated a significant correlation with team effectiveness, and collaboration (p=0.054, r=0.173), which indicated insignificant correlation. Five sets of recommendations are proposed, including strengthening the collaboration and upgrading network's activities, increasing communication to minimize misunderstanding among members, managing the perception by activating a sense of ownership, co-creating the alumni network by embracing the entrepreneurial of the voluntary network, and investing in a full-time post who orchestrates on-going activities of the EGG alumni network

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Saw, K. K., & Preudhikulpradab, S. . (2021). Leveraging Leadership, Collaboration, and Decision-Making to Improve Team Effectiveness: A Case of Education Gathering Group (EGG) Alumni Network in Kayin State, Myanmar. AU-GSB E-JOURNAL, 14(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.14456/augsbejr.2021.4
Section
Articles

References

Allio, R.J. (2006). Strategic thinking: the ten big ideas, Strategy and Leadership, 34 (4), 4-13.

http://doi.org/10.1108/10878570610676837

Balkundi, P., & Kilduff, M. (2006). The Ties That Lead: A Social Network Approach to Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 419-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.01.001

Bedwell, W. L., Wildman, J. L., DiazGranados, D., Salazar, M., Kramer, W. S., & Salas, E. (2012). Collaboration at work: An integrative multilevel conceptualization. Human Resource Management Review, 22(2), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.11.007

Bligh, M.C., Pearce, C.L. and Kohles, J.C. (2006). The importance of self-and shared leadership in team-based knowledge work, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 296-318.

https://DOI.org/10.1108/02683940610663105

Bourgault, M., Drouin, N. and Hamel, E. (2008). Decision-making within distributed project teams: an exploration of formalization and autonomy as determinants of success, Project Management Journal, 39(S97-S110), 97-110 https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20063

Bunderson, J. and Sutcliffe, K. (2003). Management team learning orientation and business unit performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 552-60.

https://DOI.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.552

Cadwell, C., Hayes, L.A. (2016). Self-efficacy and self-awareness: moral insights to increased leader effectiveness, Journal of Management Development, 35(9),1163-1173. http://DOI.org/10.1108/JMD-01-2016-0011

Carson, J.B., Tesluk, P.E. and Marrone, J.A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: an investigation of antecedent conditions and performance, Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217-34 https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.20159921

Castka, P., Bamber, C., Sharp, J. and Belohoubek, P. (2001). Factors affecting successful implementation of high-performance teams, Team Performance Management, An International Journal, 7(7), 123-34.

http://DOI.org/10.1108/13527590110411037

Chiocchio, F., Forgues, D., Paradis, D. and Iordanova, I. (2011). Teamwork in integrated design projects: understanding the effects of trust, conflict, and collaboration on performance, 42 (6), 78-91.

https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20268

Cohen, S.G., & Bailey, D.E. (1997). What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite, Journal of Management, 23(3),239-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300303

Crippen, C,. (2004). Servant Leadership as an Effective Model

for Educational Leadership and Management: first to serve, then to lead. Management in Education, 18 (5), 11-16

https://journals.sagepub.com/action/doSearch?filterOption=thisJournal&SeriesKey=miea&AllField=Servant%02Leadership+as+an+Effective+Model+for+Educational+Leadership+and+Management%3A+first+to+serve%2C+then+to+lead

DeOrtentiis, P.S., Summers, J.K, Ammeter, A.P., Douglas, C., and Ferris, G.R. (2013). Cohesion and satisfaction as mediators of the team trust – team effectiveness relationship. An interdependence theory perspective, Career Development International, 18 (5), 521-543. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-03-2013-0035

Draganidis, F. and Mentzas, G. (2006). Competency-based management: a review of systems and approaches, Information Management & Computer Security, 14(1), 51-64. http://DOI.org/10.1108/09685220610648373

Drouin, N., Bourgault, M., and Gervais, C. (2010). How organizations support distributed project teams: Key dimensions and their impact on decision making and teamwork effectiveness, Journal of Management Development, 32 (8).

http://DOI.org/10.1108/JMD-07-2012-0091

Harvey, C.M. & Koubek, R.J. (2000). Cognitive, social, and environmental attributes of distributed engineering collaboration: a review and proposed model

https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6564(200023)10:4%3C369::AID-HFM2%3E3.0.CO;2-Y

Huxham, C. (2003). Theorizing collaboration practice, Public Management Review, 5, 401-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1471903032000146964

Jagdev, H.S. and Thoben, K.-D. (2001). Anatomy of enterprise collaboration, Production Planning & Control, 12(5), 437-51 https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280110042675

Josh D., C., Tillman, J., Nancy G., B., and Mckee, V. (2013). Cross‐functional team effectiveness. An International Journal, 19 (1/2), 34-56.http://DOI.org/10.1108/13527591311312088

Kulkarni, P., Mutkekar, R., & Ingalagi, R. (2020). Role of strategic management for employee engagement and skill development for start-ups. Journal of Management, 17 (1/2), 79-95. http://DOI.org/10.1108/XJM-07-2020-0036

LePine, J. (2003). Team adaptation and post-change performance: effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 27-39 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.27

Oliveira, A. (2007). (PDF) A Discussion of Rational and Psychological Decision-Making Theories and Models: The Search for a Cultural-Ethical Decision-Making Model Decision-Making Theories and Models https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237240094_A_Discussion_of_Rational_and_Psychological_Decision-Making_Theories_and_Models_The_Search_for_a_Cultural-Ethical_Decision-Making_Model_Decision-Making_Theories_and_Models

Ross, T., Jones, E.C. and Adams, S.G. (2008). Can team effectiveness be predicted? Team Performance Management, 14(5/6), 248-268.

http://DOI.org/10.1108/13527590810898518

Tarricone, P.,& Luca, Joe. (2002). Successful Team: A Case Study. http://Microsoft Word - Tarricone.doc (unice.fr)

Seijts, G.H, Latham, G.P and Whyte, G. (2000). Effect of self-and group efficacy on group performance in a mixed-motive situation, Human Performance, 13(3), 279-98. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1303_3

Stephenson, L.A., & Yerger, B.D. (2014). Optimizing engagement: brand identification and alumni donation behaviors, International Journal of Educational Management, 28(6), 765-778.

http://Optimizing engagement: brand identification and alumni donation behaviors, International Journal of Educational Management | 10.1108/IJEM-04-2013-0057 | DeepDyve

Yukl, G. (2012). Effective leadership behavior: What we know

and what questions need more attention. The Academy of

Management Perspectives, 26(4), 66– 85.

https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0088