Assessing Factors Impacting Satisfaction and Continuance Intention of Middle School Art Teachers to Use E-Learning Systems in Chongqing, China

Authors

  • Beizhen Li Mr.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/abacodijournal.2024.17
CITATION
DOI: 10.14456/abacodijournal.2024.17
Published: 2024-04-24

Keywords:

e-learning, middle schools, service quality, satisfaction, continuance intention

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate key elements that significantly impact the satisfaction and continuance intention to use e-leaning of art teachers from middle schools in Chongqing, China. The framework included relationships between engagement, course structure, system quality, information quality, service quality, perceived usefulness, satisfaction, and continuance intention. The researcher distributed the quantitative questionnaires to 500 teachers at 15 middle schools in Chongqing, China. The sampling strategies used to collect the data include judgmental, quota and convenience sampling. Before the data collection, the expert rating of the item's index–objective congruence (IOC) and pilot tested with 50 respondents. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling were used to analyze the data. The result of the data analysis supported five hypotheses, with perceived usefulness showing the strongest impact on satisfaction. Furthermore, satisfaction has a significant impact on continuance intention. As technology advances, online education has become a viable and sometimes preferred option for delivering instruction. Instructors should recognize that online education can offer various benefits, such as flexibility, accessibility, and the ability to incorporate multimedia elements into lessons.

References

Abel, R. (2005). Implementing best practices in online learning. Educause Quarterly, 28(3), 75-77.

Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Wade, C. A., Borokhovski, E., Tamim, R., Surkes, M., & Zhang, D. (2006). A review of e-learning in Canada: rejoinder to commentaries. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 32(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21432/t2302p

Aini, Q., Rahardja, U., & Hariguna, T. (2019). The antecedent of perceived value to determine of student continuance intention and student participate adoption of ilearning. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 242-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.120

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in human behavior, 102, 67-86.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004

Almahamid, S., & Rub, F. A. (2011). Factors that determine continuance intention to use e-learning system: an empirical investigation. In International conference on telecommunication technology and applications Proc. of CSIT, 5(1), 242-246.

Alsabawy, A. Y., Cater-Steel, A., & Soar, J. (2016). Determinants of perceived usefulness of e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 843-858.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.065

Andresile, P., Tukei, J. M. O., Alupo, C. D., Tukei, L., & Edemacu, K. (2022). Information quality and information systems success: Perspective of monitoring, evaluation, accountability and learning information systems grounded on delone and mclean model. Research Dissemination Platform, 1(2), 1-10.

Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of covid19. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(3), 285-292.

https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.73.285.292

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

Birch, L. L., Fisher, J. O., Grimm-Thomas, K., Markey, C. N., & Sawyer, R. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the child feeding questionnaire: a measure of parental attitudes, beliefs and practices about child feeding and obesity proneness. National Library of Medicine, 36(3), 201-210.

Chang, L. L., F. Backman, K., & Chih Huang, Y. (2014). Creative tourism: a preliminary examination of creative tourists’ motivation, experience, perceived value, and revisit intention. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 8(4), 401-419. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcthr-04-2014-0032

Chen, C. F., & Chen, F. S. (2010). Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists. Tourism management, 31(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.008

Cheung, G. W., & Wang, C. (2017). Current approaches for assessing convergent and discriminant validity with SEM: Issues and solutions. In Academy of management proceedings, Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management, 2017(1), 12706. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2017.12706abstract

Chiu, C.-M., & Wang, E. T. G. (2008). Understanding web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value. Information & Management, 45(3), 194-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.02.003

Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., Sun, S.-Y., Lin, T.-C., & Sun, P.-C. (2005). Usability, quality, value, and e-learning continuance decisions. Computers & Education, 45(4), 399-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.06.001

Clark-Carter, D. (1997). Doing quantitative psychological research: From design to report (3rd ed.). Psychology Press.

Daneji, A. A., Ayub, A. F. M., & Khambari, M. N. M. (2019). The effects of perceived usefulness, confirmation, and satisfaction on continuance intention in using massive open online course (MOOC). Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 11(2), 201-214.

DeCoster, J. (1998). Overview of factor analysis. http://www.stat-help.com/notes.html

Dennen, V. P., Darabi, A. A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor-learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28(1), 65-79.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910701305319

Dominici, G., & Palumbo, F. (2013). How to build an e-learning product: Factors for student/customer satisfaction. Business Horizons, 56(1), 87-96.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2012.09.011

Dubey, S. K., Ghosh, S., & Rana, A. (2012). Comparison of software quality models: an analytical approach. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 2(2), 111-119.

Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students' perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00114.x

Fan, X., Duangekanong, S., & Xu, M. (2021). Factors affecting college students’ intention to use English U-learning in Sichuan, China. AU-GSB E-JOURNAL, 14(2), 118-129. https://doi.org/10.14456/augsbejr.2021.20

Fatima, J., & Razzaque, M. (2014). Service quality and satisfaction in the banking sector. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 31(4), 1-10.

Gable, G. G., Sedera, D., & Chan, T. (2008). Re-conceptualizing information system success: The IS-impact measurement model. Journal of the association for information systems, 9(7), 18.

Gao, L., Waechter, K. A., & Bai, X. (2015). Understanding consumers’ continuance intention towards mobile purchase: A theoretical framework and empirical study–A case of China. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 249-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.014

Garett, R., Chiu, J., Zhang, L., & Young, S. D. (2016). A Literature Review: Website Design and User Engagement. Online J Commun Media Technol, 6(3), 1-14.

https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2556

Garg, S., & Sharma, S. (2020). User satisfaction and continuance intention for using e-training: A structural equation model. Vision, 24(4), 441-451.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262920926827

Ghasemaghaei, M., & Hassanein, K. (2015). Online information quality and consumer satisfaction: The moderating roles of contextual factors–A meta-analysis. Information & Management, 52(8), 965-981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.07.001

Gorla, N., & Somers, T. M., & Wong, B. (2010). Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(3), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.05.001

Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), 1-20.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results, and higher acceptance. Long range planning, 46(1-2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001

Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.3200/joer.98.3.184-192

Hassanzadeh, A., Kanaani, F., & Elahi, S. (2012). A model for measuring e-learning systems success in universities. Expert systems with Applications, 39(12), 10959-10966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.028

Hoyle, R. H. (2000). Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling, 465-497.

https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012691360-6/50017-3

Isik, O. (2008, November). E-learning satisfaction factors. In Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the decision sciences institute, Baltimore (pp. 941-946).

Jennings, J. M., & Angelo, T. A. (Eds.). (2006). Student Engagement: Measuring and Enhancing Engagement with Learning: Proceedings of a Symposium Held on Monday and Tuesday 27 and 28 March 2006 at the Frederic Wallis House Conference Centre, Lower Hutt, New Zealand (1st ed.). New Zealand Universities Academic Audit Unit.

Kaewkitipong, L., Chen, C. C., & Ractham, P. (2016). Using social media to enrich information systems field trip experiences: Students’ satisfaction and continuance intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 256-263.

Klassen, R., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on Teachers' Self-Efficacy and Job Satisfaction: Teacher Gender, Years of Experience, and Job Stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741-756. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019237

Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press, 8(12), 1-10.

Kucuk, S., & Richardson, J. C. (2019). a structural equation model of predictors of online learners' engagement and satisfaction. Online Learning, 23(2), 196-216.

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1455

Lee, H. J., & Rha, I. (2009). Influence of structure and interaction on student achievement and satisfaction in web-based distance learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 372-382.

Lee, J.-W. (2010). Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 277-283.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.08.002

Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & education, 48(2), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.004

Lin, H. H., & Wang, Y. S. (2006). An examination of the determinants of customer loyalty in mobile commerce contexts. Information & Management, 43, 271-282.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.08.001

Liu, I. F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C. H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online learning community. Computers & education, 54(2), 600-610.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009

Liu, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, H., & Huang, W. (2017). Gender differences in information quality of virtual communities: A study from an expectation-perception perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 224-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.011

Lu, X., Wontakal, S. N., Emelyanov, A. V., Morcillo, P., Konev, A. Y., Fyodorov, D. V., & Skoultchi, A. I. (2009). Linker histone H1 is essential for Drosophila development, the establishment of pericentric heterochromatin, and a normal polytene chromosome structure. Genes Dev, 23(4), 452-465.

Ma, J., Han, X., Yang, J., & Cheng, J. (2015). Examining the necessary condition for engagement in an online learning environment based on learning analytics approach: The role of the instructor. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 26-34.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.005

Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B., & Shavelson, R. J. (1988). A multifaceted academic self-concept. Its’ hierarchical structure and its’ relation to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 366380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.366

Mouakket, S. (2015). Factors influencing continuance intention to use social network sites: The Facebook case. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 102-110.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.045

Nagy, A. (2005). The impact of e-learning. E-Content: Technologies and perspectives for the European Market, 1(2), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26387-x_4

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Ozkan, S., Koseler, R., & Baykal, N. (2009). Evaluating learning management systems: Adoption of hexagonal e-learning assessment model in higher education. Transforming government: people, process, and policy, 3(2), 111-130.

https://doi.org/10.1108/17506160910960522

Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. R. (2012). The past, present, and future of “IS success. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(5), 2.

https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00296

Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019). Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3

Prebensen, N. K., & Xie, J. (2017). Efficacy of co-creation and mastering on perceived value and satisfaction in tourists' consumption. Tourism Management, 60, 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.12.001

Roca, J. C., Chiu, C.-M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003

Ryu, K., Han, H., & Kim, T. H. (2008). The relationships among overall quick-casual restaurant image, perceived value, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(3), 459-469.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.11.001

Saadé, R. G. (2007). Dimensions of perceived usefulness: Toward enhanced assessment. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(2), 289-310.

Sedera, D., Gable, G., & Chan, T. (2004). A factor and structural equation analysis of the enterprise systems success measurement model. In Proceedings of the 10th Americas conference on information systems, 676-682.

Soper, D. S. (2023). A-Priori Sample Size Calculator for Structural Equation Models [Software]. http://wwwdanielsopercom/statcalc

Stiakakis, E., & Georgiadi, C. K. (2009). E-service quality: Comparing the provider’s and customer’s perceptions. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 19(4), 410-430. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520910971539

Taherdoost, H. (2017). Determining sample size; how to calculate survey sample size. International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, 2, 1-10.

Teo, T., Ursavas, O. F., & Bancekapili, E. (2014). Efficiency of the technology acceptance model to explain pre-service teachers' intention to use technology. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 29(2), 93-101.

Tirziu, A. M., & Vrabie, C. (2015). Education 2.0: E-learning methods. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 376-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.213

Tsai, P. C. F., Yen, Y. F., Huang, L. C., & Huang, C. (2007). A study on motivating employees’ learning commitment in the post-downsizing era: Job satisfaction perspective. Journal of world business, 42(2), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2007.02.002

Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling. Handbook of Psychology, 2, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0224

Uzir, U. H., Jerin, I., Al Halburi, H., Abdul Hamid, A. B., & Abdul Latiff, A. S. (2020). Does quality stimulate customer satisfaction where perceived value mediates and the usage of social media moderates? Heliyon, 6(12), e05710.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05710

Wang, Y. S., & Liao, Y. W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government information quarterly, 25(4), 717-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.06.002

Yaghi, H. M., & Ghaith, G. M. (2002). Correlates of Computing Confidence Among Teachers in an International Setting. Computers in the Schools, 19(1-2), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1300/j025v19n01_07

Zhao, H., Su, C., & Hua, Z. (2016). Investigating continuance intention to follow a brand micro-blog: Perceived value and social identification. Information Development, 32(5), 1428-1441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915602522

Downloads

Published

2024-04-24

How to Cite

Li, B. (2024). Assessing Factors Impacting Satisfaction and Continuance Intention of Middle School Art Teachers to Use E-Learning Systems in Chongqing, China . ABAC ODI JOURNAL Vision. Action. Outcome, 11(2), 300-315. https://doi.org/10.14456/abacodijournal.2024.17