Antecedences to Satisfaction and Continuance Intention to Use E-learning of Postgraduate Students in Beijing, China

Authors

  • Xi Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/abacodijournal.2023.51
CITATION
DOI: 10.14456/abacodijournal.2023.51
Published: 2023-10-24

Keywords:

E-learning, Satisfaction, Continuance Intention, System Quality, Information Quality

Abstract

This article aimed to investigate the critical factors impacting postgraduate students’ satisfaction and continuance intention to use e-learning in the Beijing Film Academy, Beijing, China. The main theories were Information Systems Success Model (ISSM), Expectation Confirmation Theory (ECT), and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The conceptual framework contains perceived usefulness, confirmation, satisfaction, system quality, information quality, service quality, and continuance intention. The sample size is 483 participants who completed online questionnaire. The study employed three sampling techniques: purposive sampling, quota sampling, and convenience sampling. To ensure content validity, the index of item-objective congruence (IOC) was utilized, along with a pilot test involving a sample of 50 participants, and the reliability of the measurements was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Additionally, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM) were employed to analyze the data and generate the findings. The results showed that confirmation has a significant impact on perceived usefulness. Perceived usefulness, confirmation, system quality, information quality, and service quality significantly impact satisfaction. Perceived usefulness and satisfaction significantly impact continuance intention. In conclusion, educators and e-learning system developers should exploit the benefits of online learning in order to increase students’ learning efficiency.

References

Limayem, M., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2008). Understanding information systems continuance: The case of Internet-based learning technologies. Information & Management, 45(4), 227-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.02.005

Lin, W.-S., & Wang, C.-H. (2012). Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e-learning system in blended learning instruction: A contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit. Computers & Education, 58(1), 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.008

Masrek, M. N., & Gaskin, J. E. (2016). Assessing users’ satisfaction with web digital library: the case of Universiti Teknologi MARA. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 33(1), 36-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijilt-06-2015-0019

Mirabolghasemi, M., Shasti, R., & Hosseinikhah Choshaly, S. (2021). An investigation into the determinants of blended leaning satisfaction from EFL learners’ perspective. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-07-2020-0117

Mouakket, S., & Bettayeb, A. M. (2015). Investigating the factors influencing continuance usage intention of Learning management systems by university instructors. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 11(4), 491-509. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijwis-03-2015-0008

Nagy, J. T. (2018). Evaluation of Online Video Usage and Learning Satisfaction: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 161-175. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2886

Nugroho, Y., & Prasetyo, A. (2018). Assessing information systems success: a respecification of the DeLone and McLean model to integrating the perceived quality. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(1), 348-360. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(1).2018.34

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Office of Educational Technology. (n.d.). Reimagining the Role of Technology in Education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan Update. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3150499

Pedroso, R., Zanetello, L., Guimaraes, L., Pettenon, M., Goncalves, V., Scherer, J., Kessler, F., & Pechansky, F. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the crack use relapse scale (CURS). Archives of Clinical Psychiatry, 43(3), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-60830000000081

Petter, S., & McLean, R. (2009). A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level. Information & Management, 46(3), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.12.006

Rughoobur-Seetah, S., & Hosanoo, Z. A. (2021). An evaluation of the impact of confinement on the quality of e-learning in higher education institutions. Quality Assurance in Education, 29(4), 422-444. https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-03-2021-0043

Rui-Hsin, K., & Lin, C. T. (2018). The usage intention of e-learning for police education and training. Policing: An International Journal, 41(1), 98-112. https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-10-2016-0157

Salimon, M. G., Sanuri, S. M. M., Aliyu, O. A., Perumal, S., & Yusr, M. M. (2021). E-learning satisfaction and retention: a concurrent perspective of cognitive absorption, perceived social presence and technology acceptance model. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 23(1), 109-129. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsit-02-2020-0029

Sica, C., & Ghisi, M. (2007). The Italian versions of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory-II: Psychometric properties and discriminant power. In M.A. Lange (Ed.), Leading - Edge Psychological Tests and Testing Research (pp. 27-50). Nova.

Tan, X., & Kim, Y. (2015). User acceptance of SaaS-based collaboration tools: a case of Google Docs. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-04-2014-0039

Teng, D. C.-E., Chen, N.-S., Kinshuk, D. R., & Leo, T. (2012). Exploring students' learning experience in an international online research seminar in the Synchronous Cyber Classroom. Computers & Education, 58(3), 918-930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.018

Udo, G. J., Bagchi, K. K., & Kirs, P. J. (2011). Using SERVQUAL to assess the quality of e-learning experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1272-1283.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.01.009

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., Chan, F. K. Y., Hu, P. J. H., & Brown, S. A. (2011). Extending the two-stage information systems continuance model: incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context. Information Systems Journal, 21(6), 527-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00373.x

Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 303-313. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565056

Wang, C. S., Jeng, Y. L., & Huang, Y. M. (2017). What influences teachers to continue using cloud services? The Electronic Library, 35(3), 520-533. https://doi.org/10.1108/el-02-2016-0046

Whitehead, A. L., Julious, S. A., Cooper, C. L., & Campbell, M. J. (2015). Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 25(3), 1057-1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280215588241

Wright, S. (1920). The Relative Importance of Heredity and Environment in Determining the Piebald Pattern of Guinea-Pigs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 6(6), 320-332. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.6.6.320.

Xu, F., Tian, M., Xu, G., Reyes Ayala, B., & Shen, W. (2017). Understanding Chinese users’ switching behavior of cloud storage services. The Electronic Library, 35(2), 214-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/el-04-2016-0080

Downloads

Published

2023-10-24

How to Cite

Li, X. (2023). Antecedences to Satisfaction and Continuance Intention to Use E-learning of Postgraduate Students in Beijing, China. ABAC ODI JOURNAL Vision. Action. Outcome, 11(1), 412-428. https://doi.org/10.14456/abacodijournal.2023.51