Determinants of Undergraduate Students’ Continuance Intention to Use E-learning of at a Public University in Chengdu, China


  • Yanjing Wang

DOI: 10.14456/abacodijournal.2023.46
Published: 2023-10-24


E-Learning, Service Quality, Information Quality, Satisfaction, Continuance Intention


This study aims to examine the students’ continuance intention of using e-learning platforms in a public university in Chengdu, China. Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Information System Success Model (ISSM), and Expectation-confirmation Model (ECM), this study comprises seven variables, including computer self-efficacy, system quality, information quality, service quality, perceived usefulness, satisfaction, and continuance intention. The researcher applied a quantitative survey approach with 497 undergraduates with at least one semester of e-learning experience in the School of Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Environment, School of Food and Bioengineering, School of Law and Sociology, and School of Science of Chengdu Xihua University. The index of item-objective congruence (IOC) was applied and a pilot test (n=50) were conducted to evaluate the reliability using Cronbach's Alpha coefficient. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling were employed in this study to assess the data, the validity, reliability, factor loadings, and the path coefficient. The results of the data analysis confirmed that perceived usefulness indicated the most powerful direct impact on satisfaction. In conclusion, administrators and teachers should pay adequate attention to computer self-efficacy, system quality, information quality, service quality, perceived usefulness and satisfaction that have had a substantial effect on students’ continuance intention to use e-learning platforms and consider the associated teaching reform in the future according to the findings of this research.


Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Stair, R. (2000). Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy-An Empirical Assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418-430.

Aldholay, A. H., Isaac, O., Abdullah, Z., Abdulsalam, R., & Al-Shibami, A. H. (2018). An extension of Delone and McLean IS success model with self-efficacy. Campus-wide Information Systems, 35(4), 285-304.

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86.

Almazán, D. A., Tovar, Y. S., & Quintero, J. M. M. (2017). Influence of information systems on organizational results. Contaduría Y Administración, 62(2), 321-338.

Ambalov, I. A. (2018). A meta-analysis of IT continuance: An evaluation of the expectation-confirmation model. Telematics and Informatics, 35(6), 1561-1571.

Arteaga Sánchez, R., Duarte Hueros, A., & García Ordaz, M. (2013). E-learning and the University of Huelva: a study of WebCT and the technological acceptance model. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 30(2), 135-160.

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. C. (1980). Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.

Beran, T. N., & Violato, C. (2010). Structural equation modeling in medical research: a primer. BMC research notes, 3(1), 1-10.

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.

Boomsma, A. (1985). Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika, 50(2), 229-242.

Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative Approaches to Testing for the Factorial Validity of a Measuring Instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55-86.

Chang, C. (2013). Exploring the determinants of e‐learning systems continuance intention in academic libraries. Library Management, 34(1/2), 40-55.

Chau, P. Y. K. (1996). An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), 185-204.

Cheng, E. W. L. (2001). SEM Being More Effective than Multiple Regression in Parsimonious Model Testing for Management Development Research. Journal of Management Development, 20, 650-667.

Cheng, Y.-M. (2012). Effects of quality antecedents on e-learning acceptance. Internet Research, 22(3), 361-390.

Cheng, Y.-M. (2014). Extending the expectation-confirmation model with quality and flow to explore nurses continued blended e-learning intention. Information Technology & People, 27(3), 230-258.

Cheng, Y.-M. (2019). How does task-technology fit influence cloud-based e-learning continuance and impact? Education + Training, 61(4), 480-499.

Cheng, Y.-M. (2021). Can gamification and interface design aesthetics lead to MOOCs' success?. Education + Training, 63(9), 1346-1375.

Cheng, Y.-M. (2022). Can tasks and learning be balanced? A dual-pathway model of cloud-based e-learning continuance intention and performance outcomes. Kybernetes, 51(1), 210-240.

Chopra, G., Madan, P., Jaisingh, P., & Bhaskar, P. (2019). Effectiveness of e-learning portal from students’ perspective: A structural equation model (SEM) approach. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(2), 94-116.

Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2017). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers & Education, 122, 273-290.

Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2010). Business Research Methods (11th Ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.

Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine faculty use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) in higher education institutions. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 11(2),210-232.

Fokides, E. (2017). Greek Pre-service Teachers’ Intentions to Use Computers as In-service Teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(1), 56-75.

Gong, M., Xu, Y., & Yu, Y. (2004). An Enhanced Technology Acceptance Model for Web-Based Learning. The Journal of Information and Systems in Education,15(4), 365-374.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. (1st ed.). Springer Nature.

Hair, J. F., Jr., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101-110.

Hayashi, A., Chen, C. C., Ryan, T., & Wu, J. (2004). The role of social presence and moderating role of computer self-efficacy in predicting the continuance usage of e-learning systems. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(2), 139-154.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.

iResearch. (n.d.). Chinese online education industry research report 2020, Shanghai, China.

Kanwal, F., & Rehman, M. (2017). Factors affecting e-learning adoption in developing countries–empirical evidence from Pakistan’s higher education sector. IEEE Access, 5, 10968-10978.

Lee, Y.-H., Hsiao, C., & Purnomo, S. H. (2014). An empirical examination of individual and system characteristics on enhancing e-learning acceptance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(5), 562-579.

Liaw, S.-S., Huang, H.-M., & Chen, G.-D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1066-1080.

Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2006). Methods in educational research: From theory to practice (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359-374.

Mouakket, S., & Bettayeb, A. M. (2015). Investigating the factors influencing continuance usage intention of Learning management systems by university instructors: The Blackboard system case. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 11(4), 491-509.

Nguyen, H. T. H., Pham, H. V., Vu, N. H., & Hoang, H. T. (2020). Factors Influencing Students' Intention to Use E-learning System: A Case Study Conducted in Vietnam. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(18), 165.

Nyagorme, P. (2018). E-learning Perceived Usefulness, Self-Efficacy and Attitude of Distance Learners and eLearning Uptake at the College of Distance Education, University of Cape Coast. IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Engineering & Technology, 6(1), 15-26.

Oliver, R. L. (1977). Effect of Expectation and Disconfirmation on Postexposure Product Evaluations: An Alternative Interpretation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 480-486.

Ong, C.-S., & Lai, J.-Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816-829.

Ong, C.-S., Lai, J.-Y., & Wang, Y.-S. (2004). Factors affecting engineers' acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Information & Management, 41(6), 795-804.

Pedroso, R., Zanetello, L., Guimarães, L., Pettenon, M., Gonçalves, V., Scherer, J., Kessler, F., & Pechansky, F. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the Crack Use Relapse Scale (CURS). Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo), 43(3), 37-40.

Perry, J. L., Nicholls, A. R., Clough, P. J., & Crust, L. (2015). Assessing Model Fit: Caveats and Recommendations for Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 19(1), 12-21.

Petter, S., & McLean, E. R. (2009). A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: an examination of IS success at the individual level. Information & Management, 46(3), 159-166.

Roca, J. C., & Gagné, M. (2008). Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1585-1604.

Roca, J. C., Chiu, C.-M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683-696.

Rughoobur-Seetah, S., & Hosanoo, Z. A. (2021). An evaluation of the impact of confinement on the quality of e-learning in higher education institutions. Quality Assurance in Education, 29(4), 422-444.

Salkind, N. J. (2012). Exploring Research (8th ed.). Pearson Press.

Salloum, S. A., AlHamad, A. Q. M., Al-Emran, M., Monem, A. A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Exploring Students’ Acceptance of E-Learning Through the Development of a Comprehensive Technology Acceptance Model. IEEE Access, 7, 128445-128462.

Samarasinghe, S. M. (2012). E-Learning systems success in an organizational context [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Massey University of New Zealand.

Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-Examining Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 17(4), 517-525.

Sun, S. (2016). Online Teaching 4.0: “Internet +” classroom teaching. The Chinese Journal of ICT in Education, 14, 17-20.

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 1273-1296.

Usman, O., Septianti, A., Susita, M., & Marsofiyati, M. (2020). The effect of computer self-efficacy and subjective norm on the perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and behavioural intention to use technology. Journal of Southeast Asian Research, 11, 6662-6673.

Vululleh, P. (2018). Determinants of students’ e-learning acceptance in developing countries: An approach based on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 14(1), 141-151.

Wang, W.-T., & Wang, C.-C. (2009). An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 761-774.

Wijaya, I. W. K., Rai, A. A. G., & Hariguna, T. (2019). The impact of customer experience on customer behavior intention uses in social media commerce, an extended expectation confirmation model: An empirical study. Management Science Letters, 9(12), 2009-2020.

Wiley, D., & Hilton, J. L. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4), 133-147.

Yuen, A. H. K., & Ma, W. W. K. (2008). Exploring teacher acceptance of e-learning technology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 229-243.

Zhang, C. (2020). Problems and countermeasures of online education reform in colleges and universities under the background of Internet +. Innovation and entrepreneurship theory research and practice, 1(19), 67-74.




How to Cite

Wang, Y. (2023). Determinants of Undergraduate Students’ Continuance Intention to Use E-learning of at a Public University in Chengdu, China. ABAC ODI JOURNAL Vision. Action. Outcome, 11(1), 326-344.