Linking Cabin Crew’s Motivation to Service Performance: The Mediating Role of Ambidextrous Behavior

Authors

  • Prae Sinanuwong National Institute of Development Administration, Thailand
  • Charoenchai Agmapisarn National Institute of Development Administration, Thailand
  • Siriporn Khetjenkarn National Institute of Development Administration, Thailand

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effect of two types of motivation (intrinsic and extrinsic motivations) on the ambidextrous behavior of cabin crew. Ambidextrous behavior refers to the capability of the cabin crew members to engage in and alternate between opposing activities (i.e., exploitation and exploration), leading to better service performance. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire disseminated to 569 cabin crew members working in commercial, Asia-based airlines. Results confirmed that both types of motivation were positively related to individuals’ ambidexterity. Additionally, cabin crew members who pursue both exploration and exploitation activities in managing their time and resources, exhibit positive service performance. The mediating role of ambidextrous behavior was also supported. The benefits of this study can be used as a reference for the selection, training, and development, as well as the evaluation, of cabin crew members who must perform ambidextrous behavior to improve their service performance.

References

Ahammad, M. F., Lee, S. M., Malul, M., & Shoham, A. (2015). Behavioral ambidexterity: The impact of incentive schemes on productivity, motivation, and performance of employees in commercial banks. Human Resource Management, 54(S1), 45–62. doi:10.1002/hrm.21668

Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950–967. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.950

Babbar, S., & Koufteros, X. (2008). The human element in airline service quality: contact personnel and the customer. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(9), 804–830. doi.org/10.1108/01443570810895267

Bonesso, S., Gerli, F., & Scapolan, A. (2014). The individual side of ambidexterity: Do individuals’ perceptions match actual behaviors in reconciling the exploration and exploitation trade-off? European Management Journal, 32(3), 392–405. doi.org/10.1016/ j.emj.2013.07.003

Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 26–48. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0063

Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62–83. doi:10.1177/109442810141004

Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: designing dual structures for innovation. In Killman, R.H., Pondy, L.R., Sleven, & D. (Eds.), The management of organization (Vol. 1, pp. 167–188). NY: North Holland.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312

Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. doi.org/10.1002 /job.322

Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. doi.org/10.2307/20159573

Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765–778. doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.43670890

Hafkesbrink, J., & Schroll, M. (2014). Ambidextrous organizational and individual competencies in open innovation : The dawn of a new research agenda. Journal of Innovation Management, 2(1), 9–46.

Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall.

Heracleous, L., & Wirtz, J. (2009). Strategy and organization at Singapore Airlines: Achieving sustainable advantage through dual strategy. Journal of Air Transport Management, 15(6), 274–279. doi.org/10.1016/ j.jairtraman.2008.11.011

Herzberg, F. (1987). One More Time : How Do You motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 65(5), 109–120.

Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 280–293. doi:10.5465/ amj.2009.37308035

Jasmand, C., Blazevic, V., & de Ruyter, K. D. (2012). Generating sales while providing service: A study of customer service representatives’ ambidextrous behavior. Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 20–37. doi:10.1509/ jm.10.0448

Jiang, K., Hu, J., Hong, Y., Liao, H., & Liu, S. (2016). Do it well and do it right : The impact of service climate and ethical climate on business performance and the boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(11), 1553–1568. doi:10.1037/ apl0000138

Jung, J. H., Yoo, J. J., & Arnold, T. J. (2017). Service climate as a moderator of the effects of customer-to-customer interac-tions on customer support and service quality. Journal of Service Research, 1–15. doi:10.1177/1094670517714331

Kao, Y.-L., & Chen, C.-F. (2016). Antecedents, consequences and moderators of ambidextrous behaviours among frontline employees. Management Decision, 54(8), 1846–1860. doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2015-0187

Kauppila, O. P., & Tempelaar, M. P. (2016). The social-cognitive underpinnings of employees’ ambidextrous behaviour and the supportive role of group managers’ leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 53(6), 1019–1044. doi:10.1111/ joms.12192

Kraimer, M. L., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2005). The role of job security in understanding the relationship between employees’ perceptions of temporary workers and employees’ performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 389–398. doi:10.1037/ 0021-9010.90.2.389

Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., Weibel, A., Dysvik, A., & Nerstad, C. G. L. (2017). Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes?. Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 244–258. doi:10.1016/ j.joep.2017.05.004

Leung, K., Chen, T., & Chen, G. (2014). Learning goal orientation and creative performance: The differential mediating roles of challenge and enjoyment intrinsic motivations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(3), 811–834. doi:10.1007/s10490-013-9367-3

Lin, C. Y.-Y. (2002). Empowerment in the service industry: An empirical study in Taiwan. The Journal of Psychology, 136(5), 533–554. doi:10.1080/ 00223980209605549

Ma, B., Liu, S., Liu, D., & Wang, H. (2016). Job security and work performance in Chinese employees: The mediating role of organisational identification. International Journal of Psychology, 51(2), 123–129. doi:10.1002/ijop.12137

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. doi:10.1287/ orsc.2.1.71

Mom, T. J. M., Fourné, S. P. L., & Jansen, J. J. P. (2015). Managers’ work experience, ambidexterity, and performance: The contingency role of the work context. Human Resource Management, 54(S1), s133–s153. doi:10.1002/hrm.21663

Mom, T. J. M., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 812–828. doi:10.1287/ orsc.1090.0427

Mom, T. J. M., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 910–931. doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-6486.2007.00697.x

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. NY: McGraw-Hill.

Park, J. Y., & Jang, S. C. S. (2014). Why do customers switch? More satiated or less satisfied. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 37, 159–170. doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijhm.2013.11.007

Pierro, A., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). Regulatory mode and the joys of doing: effects of ‘locomotion’ and ‘assessment’ on intrinsic and extrinsic task-motivation. European Journal of Personality, 20(5), 355–375. doi.org/10.1002/per.600

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452

Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409. doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058

Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0428

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Schneider, B., White, S. S., & Paul, M. C. (1998). Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: Test of a causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 150–163. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.150

Slevitch, L., & Washburn, I. (2017). Competency-based training in aviation : The impact on flight attendant performance and passenger satisfaction. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, 26(2), 18. doi:10.15394/jaaer.2017.1716

Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological, empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. doi:10.2307/256865

Valero, D., & Hirschi, A. (2016). Latent profiles of work motivation in adolescents in relation to work expectations, goal engagement, and changes in work experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 93, 67–80. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2016.01.003

Williams, C. (2003). Sky Service: The demands of emotional labour in the airline industry. Gender, Work and Organization, 10(5), 513–550. doi:10.1111/ 1468-0432.00210

Wong, S., Siu, V., & Tsang, N. (1999). The impact of demographic factors on Hong Kong hotel employees’ choice of job-related motivators. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 11(5), 230–242. doi.org/10.1108/09596119910272766

Yeh, C. W. (2012). Relationships among service climate, psychological contract, work engagement and service performance. Journal of Air Transport Management, 25, 67–70. doi.org/10.1016/ j.jairtraman.2012.08.011

Yoon, M. H., Beatty, S. E., & Suh, J. (2001). The effect of work climate on critical employee and customer outcomes: an employee-level analysis. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(5), 500–521. doi.org/10.1108/ eum0000000006095

Zhu, Y., Gardner, D. G., & Chen, H. (2016). Relationships between work team climate, individual motivation, and creativity. Journal of Management, 44(5), 2094–2115. doi.org/10.1177/ 0149206316638161

Downloads

Published

2021-07-30