THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RESOURCE AND CAPABILITY EFFECTS ON THE EXPORTER'S COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THAI CANNED AND PROCESSED SEAFOOD EXPORTERS

Authors

  • Nongnuch Boonklum Department of Business Administration, Naresuan University
  • Vichayanan Rattanawiboonsom Faculty of Business, Economics and Communications, Naresuan University, Thailand
  • Sukij Khorchurklang Faculty of Business, Economics and Communications, Naresuan University, Thailand

Keywords:

Resource, Capability, Competitive advantage (CA), Canonical correlation analysis

Abstract

A competitive advantage emerges when change occurs within an organization or industry environment. Generating superior business returns above competitors is the means to achieve such a competitive advantage. This research empirically examined and placed emphasis on the importance of a firm’s resources and the capabilities of the organization in relation to the firm’s competitive advantage. A total of 156 Thai canned and processed seafood exporters were invited to participate in the study. A questionnaire survey was conducted collecting a sample which obtained data from 48 respondents, namely managers or leading team members in canned and seafood exporter companies. Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) was used to test the hypotheses. The overall findings indicated that resource-related variables are the most important explanatory variables regarding the competitive advantage of export companies. However, there are strong interactive effects between the two variable-sets, resources and capability. The results reveal that it is recommended to build resources, in order to be effective in developing superior business returns; this should be followed by developing capabilities.

Author Biography

Nongnuch Boonklum, Department of Business Administration, Naresuan University

        

 

References

Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities.

Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1011–1025.

Ahire, S. L., Golhar, D., & Waller, M. A. (1996). Development and validation of TQM

implementation constructs. Decision Sciences 27(1), 23–53.

Al-Awadh, M. A. M. (1996). Competitive strategies and barriers to achieving competitive advantage: A study of two Saudi Arabian industries. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield, UK.

Amit, R. P., & Schoemaker, J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 4, 33–46.

Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32, 1231–1241.

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27, 643–650.

Beleska-Spasova, E. (2010). Determinants of export strategy and performance: evidence from British exporters. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield. UK.

Butt, I. (2009). The Impact of product positioning strategy, manufacturing strategy and their co-alignment on firm's performance. Doctor dissertation, Management Sprott School of Business Carleton University Ottawa, Canada.

Cavusgil, S. T., & Zou, S. (1994). Marketing strategy performance relationship: An investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. Journal of Marketing, 58, 1–21.

Collis, D. J., & Mongomery, C. A. (1995). Competing on resources: strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 118–128.

Conner, K. R. (1991). A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools

of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management, 17(1), 121–154.

Datta, D. K., Guthrie, J. P., & Wright, P. M. (2005). Human resource management and labor

productivity: Does industry matter?. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 135–145.

Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing

, 37–52.

Department of International Trade Promotion, Ministry of commerce. (2018). Foreign Trade

Statistics of Thailand. Retrieved 15 October 2018 from http://www.moc.go.th/index.php/trade-information/2015-11-16-12-08-59.html

Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1237–1249.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (October, 2017). Globefish

Highlights: A quarterly updated on world seafood markets (Jan-Jun, Statistics). Retrieved 10 May 2018 from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i8204e.pdf.

Freeman, J. (2009). Factors contributing to successful export performance of regional and metropolitan SME exporters. Doctor of Philosophy, University of the Sunshine Coast, UK.

Garson, G. D. (2006). Reliability Analysis [online]. Retrieved 10 May 2018 from http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/reliab.htm.

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California.

Grant, R. M. (2002). Contemporary Strategy Analysis (4thed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., William, C., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate

Data Analysis: Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hall, R. (1993). A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14(8), 607–618.

Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C.K. (1985). Do you really have a global strategy? Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 139–148.

Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: capability

lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 997–1010.

Hofer, C. W., & Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concept. St. Paul, USA: West Publishing.

Hoopes, D. G., Madsen, T. L., & Gordon, W. (2003). Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: Why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 889–902.

Information Communication and Technology Center, Ministry of Commerce. (2018).

Thailand trading report. Retrieved from http://www2.ops3.moc.go.th/

Kamasak, M. E. (2014). Computation of variance in compartment model parameter estimates from dynamic PET data. Med. Phys. 39(5), 2638–2648.

Lages, L. F., Silva, G., & Stlyles, C. (2009). Reletionship Capabilties, Quality, and

Innovation as Determinants of Export Performance. Journal of International Marketing, 17(4), 47–70.

Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing

New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111–125.

Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 387–401.

Markman, G. D., Espina, M. I., & Phan, P. (2004). Patents as surrogates for inimitable and

non-substitutable resources. Journal of Management, 30(4), 529–544.

Malhotra, S., & Gupta, N. (2002). Childhood disintegrative disorder: Re-examination of the

current concept. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 11, 108–114.

McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1133–1156.

Menon, A., Sundar, G. B., Phani, T. A., & Steven, W. E. (1999). Antecedents and consequences of marketing strategy making: A model and test. Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 18–40.

Morgan, N. A., Kaleka, A., & Katsikeas, C.S. (2004). Antecedents of export venture performance: A theoretical model and empirical assessment. Journal of Marketing, 68, 90–108.

Murray, J., Gao, G., & Kotabe, M. (2011). Market orientation and performance of export ventures: the process through marketing capabilities and competitive advantages. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 252–269.

Nelson, R. R. (1991). Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special, 2, 61–74.

Newbert, S. L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 121–146.

Newbert, S. L. (2008). Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: A

conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 745–768.

Pakdeenurit, P., Suthikarnnarunai, N., & Rattanawong, W. (2017). Location and key success factors of special economic zone in Thailand. Marketing and Branding Research, 4(2), 169–178.

Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179–191.

Peteraf, M. A., & Barney, J. (2003). Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 309–323.

Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137–146.

Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.

Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79–91.

Prajogo, D. I., Laosirihongthong, T., Sohal, A., & Boon-itt, S. (2007). Manufacturing strategies and innovation performance in newly industrialised countries. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(1), 52–68.

Reed, R., & De Fillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88–102.

Saboniene, A. (2009). Lithuanian export competitiveness: Comparison with other Baltic

States. Engineering Economics, 2(62), 49–57.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-03