Factors influencing perceived ease of use, attitude and behavioral intention to enhance ICT learning motivation in higher education in Cambodia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research aimed to evaluate the effects of perceived ease of use, attitude and behavioral intention to enhance ICT learning motivation in higher education in Cambodia. Therefore, this research result is beneficial to promoting of the learning environment among university student population who are struggling with application of ICT as tool in education program. The study was conducting quantitatively and applied the multi-stage sampling technique via employing purposive sampling, simple random sampling, and quota sampling method. A sample size of 521 students from the three private universities in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. This study adapted the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and the Structural Equation Model (SEM) to identify the relationship and the impact of determinants of perceived ease of use, attitude and behavioral intention to enhance ICT learning motivation in higher education in Cambodia. The results showed that Perceived ease of uses, information technology and attitude have significant impact on behavioral intention. Moreover, Perceived ease of uses and social influence have significant impact on Perceived usefulness. Also, facilitating conditions has significant impact on Perceived ease of uses. Likewise, information technology has significant impact on attitude. Additionally, task-technology fit has significant impact on attitude. Furthermore, Perceived usefulness, social influence, facilitating conditions, and facilitating conditions have no significant impact on behavioral intention.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submitting author warrants that the submission is original and that she/he is the author of the submission together with the named co-authors; to the extend the submission incorporates text passages, figures, data, or other material from the work of others, the submitting author has obtained any necessary permission.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY What does this mean?). This is to get more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for you, the authors.
References
Abbad, M. M., Morris, D., & De Nahlik, C. (2009). Looking under the bonnet: Factors affecting student adoption of e-learning systems in Jordan. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(2).
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addision-Wesley. Reading.
Akbar, F. (2013). What affects students’ acceptance and use of technology. Dietrich College of Humanities and Social Sciences.
Avci, U., & Askar, P. (2012). The comparison of the opinions of the university students on the usage of blog and wiki for their courses. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 194–205.
Barak, M., Lipson, A., & Lerman, S. (2006). Wireless laptops as means for promoting active learning in large lecture halls. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 245–263.
Bhatiasevi, V., & Yoopetch, C. (2015). The determinants of intention to use electronic booking among young users in Thailand. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 23, 1.
Bitler, D. A., Rankin, W. P., & Schrass, J. M. (2000). Academic affairs online: A survey of information available on websites in higher education. College Student Journal, 34(3), 325.
Carter, D. C. (2010). Quantitative psychological research: The complete student’s companion. New York: Psychology Press.
Chen, R.-J. (2010). Investigating models for preservice teachers’ use of technology to support student-centered learning. Computers & Education, 55(1), 32–42.
Cheung, M. W.-L. (2015). Meta-analysis: A structural equation modeling approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2013). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: an extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning, Computers & Education. Vol., 63(2), 160–175.
Chunmei, H. (2017). and Y. (2016), Understanding mobile learning adoption in higher education An empirical investigation in the context of the mobile library, Research. Vol., 35(5), 846–860.
Claar, C., Dias, L. P., & Shields, R. (2014). Student acceptance of learning management systems: a study on demographics, Issues in Information Systems. http://sprouts.aisnet.org/
Coleman, L. O., Gibson, P., Cotten, S. R., Howell-Moroney, M., & Stringer, K. (2016). Integrating computing across the curriculum: The impact of internal barriers and training intensity on computer integration in the elementary school classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(2), 275–294.
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis: psychology press.
D’ambra, J., & Wilson, C. S. (2004). Use of the World Wide Web for international travel: Integrating the construct of uncertainty in information seeking and the task‐technology fit (TTF) model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(8), 731–742.
Davis, B. F. D. (1989). Information Technology Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use. MIS Quarterly, September, 319–339.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
Drennan, J., Kennedy, J., & Pisarski, A. (2005). Factors affecting student attitudes toward flexible online learning in management education. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(6), 331–338.
Edmunds, R., Thorpe, M., & Conole, G. (2012). Student attitudes towards and use of ICT in course study, work and social activity: A technology acceptance model approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 71–84.
Egbert, H. (2009). Business success through social networks? A comment on social networks and business success. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2009.00643.x
Elkhani, N., Soltani, S., & Ahmad, M. N. (2014). The effects of transformational leadership and ERP system self-efficacy on ERP system usage. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.
Fahmy, M. F. (2004). Thinking about technology effects on higher education. Journal of Technology Studies, 30(1), 53–58.
Fidani, A., & Idrizi, F. (2012). Investigating students’ acceptance of a learning management system in university education: a structural equation modeling approach. ICT Innovations 2012 Web Proceedings, 2(23), 311–320.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Gan, C., Li, H., & Liu, Y. (2017). Understanding mobile learning adoption in higher education An empirical investigation in the context of the mobile library. Electronic Library, 35(5), 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-04-2016-0093
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 213–236.
Guttman, C. (2003). Education in and for the Information Society. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization UNESCO, France.
Ha, I., Yoon, Y., & Choi, M. (2007). Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment. Information & Management, 44(3), 276–286.
Ha, S., & Stoel, L. (2009). Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model. Journal of Business Research, 62(5), 565–571.
Hair, J. F., Money, A. H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. (2007). Research methods for business. Education+ Training.
Han, I., & Shin, W. S. (2016). The use of a mobile learning management system and academic achievement of online students. Computers & Education, 102, 79–89.
Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343–367.
Hsu, H.-H. (2012). The acceptance of Moodle: An empirical study based on UTAUT. Creative Education, 3, 44.
Hu, X., & Lai, C. (2019). Comparing factors that influence learning management systems use on computers and on mobile. Information and Learning Science, 120(7–8), 468–488. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-12-2018-0127
Jankowicz, A. D. (1995). Negotiating shared meanings of the management process: A discourse in two voices. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 8(2), 117–128.
Joo, J., & Sang, Y. (2013). Exploring Koreans’ smartphone usage: An integrated model of the technology acceptance model and uses and gratifications theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2512–2518.
Joo, Y. J., Kim, N., & Kim, N. H. (2016). Factors predicting online university students’ use of a mobile learning management system (m-LMS). Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 611–630.
Kim, S. H. (2014). A study on adoption factors of Korean smartphone users: A focus on TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) and UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology). Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 57(1), 27–30.
Lee, J.-K., & Lee, W.-K. (2008). The relationship of e-Learner’s