Hedging in English Research Articles of Thai Academic Writers

Authors

  • Lalida Wiboonwachara English Program, School of Western Languages, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University, Thailand
  • Sorabud Rungrojsuwan English for Professional Development, School of Liberal Arts, Mae Fah Luang University, Thailand

Keywords:

Hedging, Hedging markers, Thai academic writers, Thai academic novices, Thai academic Professionals, Research articles

Abstract

Hedging is an important convention in academic writing in which non-native English writers should be concerned. It is used to express the writer’s attitudes or ideas in a tentative way to soften the writer’s claims by proposing uncertainty, possibility or doubt. This paper attempts to analyze the hedging markers used by Thai academic novice writers and Thai academic professionals in terms of types and frequency in research articles written in English. The data were taken from twenty research articles published in national and international journals in the Humanities and Social Sciences field. The results showed that both Thai academic novice writers and professionals used a variety of types, namely: Shields, Approximators, and Combined-hedging markers in their academic writing. However, Thai academic professionals appeared to employ these hedging markers more frequently than Thai academic novice writers, especially the combined-hedging, where they combined more than one hedging markers to express their uncertainty and possibility of their propositions.

Author Biography

Lalida Wiboonwachara, English Program, School of Western Languages, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University, Thailand

Lecturer of Department of Western Languages (English),

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University. 

References

Chen, Y.H., & Baker, P. (2010). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language

Learning & Technology, 14(2), 30-49.

Crompton, P. (1997). Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical aspects, English for

Specific Purposes, 16, 271-289.

Csongor, A., & Rébék-Nagy, G. (2013). Hedging in popular scientific articles on medicine.

Acta Medica Marisiensis, 59(2), 97-99.

Demir, C. (2018). Hedging and academic writing: an analysis of lexical hedges. Journal of

language and linguistic studies, 14(4), 74-92.

Duman, Z.Ö. (2016). Hedging in academic writings of EFL students: ChemCorpus. The

Journal of Narrative and Language Studies, 4(6), 45-55.

Elheky, M.A. (2018). Hedging in scientific and social texts: A comparative analysis of

business and social texts. Scholar Journal of Applied Sciences and Research, 1(7),

-103.

Hyland, K. (1995). The author in the text: Hedging scientific writing. Hong Kong Papers

in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 18, 33-42.

Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lakoff, G. (1973). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts.

Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2(4), 458-508.

Loi, C.K. & Lim, J. M.H. (2019). Hedging in the discussion sections of English and

Malay educational research articles. Journal of Language Studies, 19(1), 36-61.

Martin-Martin, P. (2003). The pragmatic rhetoric strategy of hedging in academic writing.

Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 57-72.

Nasiri, S. (2012). Utilization of hedging devices by American and Iranian researchers in the

field of civil engineering. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 124-133.

Pan, F., Reppen, R., & Biber, D. (2016). Comparing patterns of L1 versus L2 English

academic professional: Lexical bundles in telecommunications research journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 60-71.

Prasithrathsint, A. (2015). Linguistic markers and stylistic attributes of hedging in English

academic papers written by native and non-native speakers of English. Manussaya: Journal of Humanities Regular, 18(1),1-21.

Petchkit, W. (2016). Hedges in research articles written in English and writing problems of

non-native writers. Journal of Humanities, Naresuan University, 12(3), 45-51.

Rezanejad, A., Lari, Z, & Mosalli, Z. (2015). A cross-cultural analysis of the use of hedging

devices in scientific research articles. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(6), 1384-1392.

Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purpose, 13(2), 149-170.

Salager-Meyer, F. (1995). I think that perhaps you should: A study of hedges in written scientific discourse. The Journal of TESOL France, 2 (2), 127-143. Retrieved from https://www.tesol-france.org/uploaded_files/files/TESOL%20V2N2%20C8%20I%20think%20that%20Perhaps.pdf.

Salichah, I.M., Iraeati, E., & Basthomi, Y. (2015). Hedges and boosters in undergraduate students’ research articles. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 3(2), 154-160. Retrieved from http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jph.

Samaie, M., Khosravian, F., & Boghayeri, M. (2014). The frequency and types of hedges in research article introductions by Persian and English native authors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1678-1685. doi:10.1016/j.abapro.2014.03.593.

Yüksel, H. G., & Kavanoz, S. (2015). Expressing claim: Hedges in English language

learners’ writing. Journal of Teaching and Education, 4 (1), 263-269.

Zanina, E. (2016). Strategies hedging: A comparative study of methods, results and discussion (and conclusion) sections of research articles in English and Russian. Journal of Language and Education, 2(2), 52-60.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-17

Issue

Section

Research articles