Miscommunication at the Workplace: Causes and Ways to Improve Internal Communication
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research were to survey the significant causes and reasons that lead to miscommunication at the workplace and to suggest the key solutions for the organizational management to improve internal communication, based on BERLO’S SMCR Model; Sender, Message, Channel and Receiver. The sampling group included 128 respondents whose level of education ranging from bachelor’s to doctorate’s degree, currently working in various organizations, covering government agencies, state enterprises, private and business sectors. The online questionnaire was used as the data collection tool and statistics used for data analysis was the Frequency and Percentage. The survey results showed that the causes of miscommunication at the workplace responded by 128 respondents ranging from agree to highly agree indicated that Sender was 68.75% (88) the highest cause, Channel 61.54% (79) as the second while Receiver 51.57% (66) and Message 49.22% (63) ranked the third and fourth consecutively. Regarding to other factors that may influence the causes of miscommunication at the workplace, the results ranging from the highest to lowest percentage and frequency as follows: 1) 25.26% (98) the attitude of either sender or receiver may cause miscommunication, 2) 21.13% (82) the readiness of both sender and receiver, 3) 18.56% (72) relationship between sender and receiver, 4) 18.04% (70) organizational context and culture, and 5) 17.01% (66) communication context consecutively. The last part of this study focused on the ways to improve internal communication at the workplace, the findings indicated that the top three key solutions with the highest percentage and frequency consecutively included: 1) 15.34% (81) sender must prepare your message before communicating with receivers 2) 14.94% (79) message must be clear and easy for receivers to understand, and 3) 13.26% (70) respect others’ opinions is a must among members in the workplace. It is fully expected that the findings of this research may inspire organizational leaders to aware of, to have an insight look into the power of communication and acknowledge how to manage communication problems before the situation worsen and may lead the organization to fail office.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submitting author warrants that the submission is original and that she/he is the author of the submission together with the named co-authors; to the extend the submission incorporates text passages, figures, data, or other material from the work of others, the submitting author has obtained any necessary permission.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY What does this mean?). This is to get more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for you, the authors.
References
Berlo’s SMCR Model of Communication. (2018). In Businesstopia. https://www.businesstopia.net/communication/berlo-model-communication
Berlo, D. K. (1960). The process of communication: an introduction to theory and practice. Rinehart.
Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5
Hofstede, G. H. (1984). Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. In Cross-cultural research and methodology series CN - GN502 .H63 1984 (Abridged e). Sage Publications.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind ; intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival (Rev. and e). McGraw-Hill.
Hyland-Wood, B., Gardner, J., Leask, J., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2021). Toward effective government communication strategies in the era of COVID-19. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00701-w
Iemwimangsa, K. (2015). Organizational Communication in National Nanotechnology Center. Thammasat University.
Importance of communication strategy within an organization. (2021). https://www.ucanwest.ca/blog/business-management/importance-of-communication-strategy-within-an-organization
Macnamara, J. (2015). Creating an Architecture of Listening in Organizations.
Numnoie, D. (2012). Communication to facilitate Business Operation Transformation in An Organization, the case study of Land and Houses Retail Bank Public Company Limited. National Institute of Development Administration.
Poldech, K., & Maneerat, G. (2020). Miscommunication and Ways to Improve Effective Internal Communication of the Student Organization of Rangsit University. May, 1502–1514.
Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. M. (2019). The Concept of Bureaucracy by Max Weber. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 7(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v7i2.3979
SMCR Model of Communication- Berlo’s SMCR Model of Communication. (2021). https://newsmoor.com/smcr-model-of-communication-david-berlos-smcr-model-of-communication-example/
Thepsiri, K. (2015). The internal communication model of faculty of business administration, Maejo University. Maejo University.
Turaga, R. (2016). Effective Communication in Organizations. The IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 10(2), 56–65.
Velentzas, J., & Broni, G. (2014). Communication cycle : Definition , process , models and examples. Recent Advances in Financial Planning and Product Development, 117–131. http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2014/Istanbul/FINANCE/FINANCE-00.pdf