A Comparative Study of Grade 6 Students’ Academic Achievement and Motivation for Learning English as a Foreign Language Under Cooperative Teaching Method and Traditional Teaching Method at Watbangchalongnai School, Samut Prakan, Thailand
Keywords:
Cooperative Teaching Method, Traditional Teaching Method, Academic Achievement, Motivation for Learning English as a Foreign Language, Grade 6 Students, ThailandAbstract
The purpose of this study was to find if cooperative teaching methods in Watbangchalongnai School, Samut Prakan, Thailand, would enhance Grade 6 students’ English academic achievement, measured by their abilities in grammar, reading comprehension, and vocabulary. The study also sought to measure students’ motivation for learning English as a foreign language (EFL). For the purpose of the study, the researcher conducted an intervention experiment for 12 weeks, from December 2018 to March 2019, in which two intact Grade 6 groups were chosen, one as experimental group and the other as control group. During the experiment, subjects in the experimental group (39 students) attended classes based on cooperative teaching method. The control group (39 students), on the other hand, did not carry out any additional activities to traditional teaching method. To control as many variables as possible, the number of classes per week, duration of each class and components to be taught were all the same in both groups. In order to test the effectiveness of such strategy, two quantitative tools for data collection were used to compile the findings of the study. To begin with, a pre-test and a post-test were administered to measure students’ academic achievement in learning EFL before and after the treatment. Afterwards, a questionnaire was distributed to both groups in order to measure students’ motivation for learning EFL. The results of the independent samples t-test on a difference of academic achievement revealed a significant difference between the two groups. The sample means showed that subjects in the experimental group increased their academic achievement from the pre-test to the post-test significantly more than subjects in the control group. Results regarding motivation for learning EFL failed to reveal a significant difference between the two groups. The sample means showed that subjects in the experimental group demonstrated high mean scores on motivation for learning EFL, which were statistically similar to those shown by subjects in the control group. Based on the research findings, recommendations for students, teachers, administrators and future researchers are provided.
References
Al Mashjari, K. (2012). The effectiveness of cooperative learning on EFL proficiency: A case study of grade ten female classroom in the New Developed High School Project in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Unpublished master’s thesis). King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Al-Tamimi, A., & Shuib, M. (2009). Motivation and attitudes towards learning English: A study of petroleum Engineering undergraduates at Hadhramout University of Science and Technology. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 9(2), 29-55.
Barham, A. I. (2002) An assessment of the effectiveness of cooperative learning strategies in promoting problem-solving skills and achievement in mathematics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, England.
Beck, R. H. (2009). The three R’s plus: What today’ school are trying to do and why. Duluth. University of Minnesota Press.
Blake, B., & Pope, T. (2008). Developmental psychology: Incorporating Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s theories in classroom. Journal of Cross-disciplinary Perspectives in Education, 1(1), 59-67.
Bohwongpresert, Y. (2017, October 2). Thai education badly needs overhaul. Bangkok Post. Retrieved from https://www.pressreader.com/thailand/bangkok-post/20171002/282170766350423
Chuanchaisit, S., & Prapphal, K. (2009). A study of English communication strategies of Thai university students. Journal of Humanities, 17(1), 100-126.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Dislen, G. (2013). The reasons of lack of motivation from the students’ and teachers’ voices. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 1(1), 35-45.
Garner, B. K. (2008). When students seem stalled: The missing link for too many kids who don’t “get it?” cognitive structures. Educational Leadership, 65(6), 32-38.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
Hossain, A., & Tarmizi, R. A. (2013). Effects of cooperative learning on students’ achievement and attitudes in secondary mathematics. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 473-477.
Jackson, L. (2016). Globalization and education. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford; New York. Oxford University Press.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition. Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 67-73.
Kagan, S. (1990). The structural approach to cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 12-15.
Kessler, C. (1992). Cooperative language learning: A teacher’s resource book. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Kirkpatrick, A. (2008). English as the official working language of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN): Features and strategies. English Today.
Kitjaroonchai, N. (2013). Motivation toward English language learning of students in secondary and high schools in Education Service Area Office 4, Saraburi Province, Thailand. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 1(1), 22-33.
Lefa, B. (2014). The Piaget’s theory of cognitive development: An educational implication. Educational Psychology, 1(9), 1-8.
Ministry of Education, 2008. The Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008). Retrieved from http://www.act.ac.th/document/1741.pdf
Mitra, S., & Crawley, E. (2014). Effectiveness of self-organized learning by children: Gateshead experiments. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(3), 79-88.
Ning, H., & Hornby, G. (2014). The impact of cooperative learning on tertiary EFL learners’ motivation. Educational Review, 66(1), 108-124.
Putry, D. P. (2015). The impacts of old-fashioned teaching methods on students’ mastery of English. Paper Writing, 1(1), 1-10.
Slavin, R. E. (1985). Cooperative learning: Applying contact theory in desegregated schools. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 41(3), 45-62.
Stewart, V. (2012). World-class education. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/111016/chapters/Globalization-and-Education.aspx
Sharifian, F. 2009. English as an international language: Perspectives and pedagogical issues. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34-41.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Quinn, P. (2006). Cooperative learning and student motivation (Unpublished master’s thesis) State University of New York College, New York, USA.
Yusica, U. (2014). Problem faced by Thai students in speaking English (Unpublished master’s thesis). The State Islamic Institute of Tulungagung, Tulungagung, Indonesia.
