A Strategic Leadership Model for Teacher Evaluation Using Walkthroughs for Student Engagement at International Schools in Thailand

Authors

  • John J McGrath Ph.D. Candidate in Education Leadership, Graduate School of Human Sciences, Assumption University, Thailand.
  • Sangob Laksana Ph.D., Former Dean of Graduate School of Human Sciences, Assumption University, Thailand.

Keywords:

Strategic Leadership, Walkthroughs, Student Engagement, Teacher Evaluation

Abstract

This study used a multi-method approach to develop a model that changed the focus of teacher evaluation by using walkthroughs to guide teacher evaluation in order to increase student engagement utilizing a strategic leadership model. The objectives were (1) to explore the current practices in teacher evaluation, walkthroughs, and student engagement, (2) to determine the current practices of teacher evaluation, walkthroughs and student engagement at international schools in Thailand, (3) to develop the proposed strategic leadership model in teacher evaluation using walkthroughs to increase student engagement, and, (4) to implement the proposed strategic leadership model in teacher evaluation using walkthrough to increase student engagement in an international school in Bangkok. Current practices regarding teacher evaluation were established by using a content analysis-based questionnaire sampling schools registered with the International Schools Association of Thailand.  The results of the questionnaire and the focus group interviews conducted, pointed to a major problem with teacher evaluation and its implementation. Current models of teacher evaluation and the leadership behind them were not effective. A new strategic leadership model was developed to use walkthroughs to improve student engagement. The model was implemented at a family of international schools in Bangkok over a six-month period. Walkthroughs gauging student engagement in areas of curriculum, instruction, environment and learning were conducted at the beginning and end of the trial period. A paired sample t-test was used to measure for statistical significance. In each of the four areas the findings were significant thereby validating the strategic leadership model and its application.

References

Bloom, G. (2007). Classroom Visitations Done Well. Leadership, 36(4), 40-42. Retrieved from http://nesloncollegeforgirlswalkabout.wikispaces.com/file/view/classroom+visitations.pdf

Christenson, S., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer.

Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A. E., & Klein, S. P. (1999). A license to teach: Raising standards for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Marzano, R. (2012, November). The Two Purposes of Teacher Evaluation. Retrieved October 1, 2015, from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov12/vol70/num03/The-Two-Purposes-of-Teacher-Evaluation.aspx

Moss, S. (2008, October 18). Flow Theory. Retrieved from http://www.psych-it.com.au/Psychlopedia/article.asp?id=62

Quong, T., & Walker, A. (2010). Seven Principles of Strategic Leadership. ISEA, 38(1), 22-34. Retrieved from https://www.ied.edu.hk/apclc/dowloadables/Publications/2010/Seven%20Principles%20of%20Strategic%20Leadership.pdf

Rowe, W. G., & Nejad, M. H. (2009). Strategic Leadership: Short Term Stability and Long Term Viability. Ivey Business Journal. Retrieved September 26, 2015, from http://iveybusinessjournal.com/publication/strategic-leadership-short-term-stability-and-long-term-viability/

Schlechty, P. C. (1997). Inventing better schools: An action plan for educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Schlecty, P. (n.d.). Schlecty Center on Student Engagement. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from https://www.schlechtycenter.org/about-the-center

Sparks, D. (1998). The Educator Examined, An Interview with Phil Sclecty. Journal of Staff Development, 19, 3rd ser. Retrieved from http://learningforward.org/docs/jsd-summer-1998/schlechty193.pdf?sfvrsn=2

Springboard Trust. (n.d.). Retrieved October 21, 2015, from http://www.springboardtrust.org.nz/our-programmes/strategic-leadership-for-principals

Tucker, P. D., & Stronge, J. H. (2005). Linking teacher evaluation and student learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Zepeda, S. J. (2007). The principal as instructional leader: A handbook for supervisors. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-27