A THOMSONIAN ARGUMENT AGAINST MEDICAL MANDATES

Authors

  • Chitchanok Wanroek Demsar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59865/prajn.2024.2
CITATION
DOI: 10.59865/prajn.2024.2
Published: 2024-01-29

Keywords:

Bodily Autonomy; Medical Mandates; Medical Ethics; Vaccine Refusal; The Violinist; Reproductive Rights; Judith Jarvis Thomson

Abstract

This paper explores the parallel between Judith Jarvis Thomson's argument for abortion rights based on bodily autonomy and the contentious issue of vaccine refusal. Drawing on Thomson's famous thought experiment involving a violinist, I present analogous scenarios involving medical decisions. I argue that if Thomson's reasoning holds, individuals also possess the right to refuse vaccines, even if it entails serious risk to others. The paper underscores the importance of recognizing that medical decisions, including vaccine refusal, should be evaluated within the framework of bodily autonomy and individual rights, challenging the prevailing opinion on this complex issue.

Author Biography

Chitchanok Wanroek Demsar

Ramkhamhaeng  University, Thailand

References

Kowalik, M. (2021). Ethics of Vaccine Refusal. Journal of Medical Ethics, 1-7.

Parent, W. A. (1980). Judith Thomson and the Logic of Rights. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 37(4), 405-418.

Singer, P. (2021, August 4). Project Syndicate. Retrieved December 23, 2023, from https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-covid-vaccine-should-be-compulsory-by-peter-singer-2021-08?barrier=accesspaylog

Thomson, J. J. (1971). A Defense of Abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(1), 47-66.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-29

Issue

Vol. 25 No. 1 (2024): January to June 2024

Section

Articles

License

Consent to Publish and Transfer of Copyright
By publishing in Prajñā Vihāra, the author agrees to transfer and assign to Assumption University of Thailand as the Publisher of the Journal, the copyright to the Article in any form, including any and all rights, interests and claims related to it.

The author does retain the following rights:

  1. The right to make further copies of the published article for their use in classroom teaching.
  2. The right to reuse all or part of the published article in a compilation of his or her own works or in textbooks of which they are the author or coauthor.
  3. The right to make copies of the published article for internal distribution within their academic institution.
  4. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
The author must also guarantee that:
  1. The Article is his or her original work, and has not been published previously and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
  2. It does not contain any matter that is obscene, libelous, or contrary to law.
  3. They have obtained the necessary license or written authority and paid any and all related fees for the use and reproduction of text, tables, illustrations and other copyrighted work from the owners of the intellectual property rights, and can furnish the Publisher copies of the license/written authority and proof of payment of related fees upon the signing of this Agreement.
  4. They have the consent of the Co-Authors of the article upon the signing of this Agreement.
  5. In the event that they intend to republish, reprint or translate all or part of the Article in other publications, they will secure the prior written permission from the journal Editor.

Prajñā Vihāra adopts the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) license