Factors Influencing University Students’ Attitude and Behavioral Intention Towards Online Learning Platform in Chengdu, China

Authors

  • Li Gao Assumption University
  • Rawin Vongurai Assumption University
  • Kitti Phothikitti Assumption University
  • Siriwan Kitcharoen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/abacodijournal.2022.2
CITATION
DOI: 10.14456/abacodijournal.2022.2
Published: 2022-04-29

Keywords:

Attitude, Online learning platform, Behavioral intention, University Students, China

Abstract

This research aims to determine the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and behavioral intention towards online learning platforms in Chengdu, China. The conceptual framework has been adopted from the theoretical studies and research models of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). A sample of 450 respondents was collected from online questionnaires using the multi-stage sampling technique of probability and non-probability sampling method for quantitative research to reach target respondents of experienced university students. The collected data were analyzed using the Structural Equation Model (SEM) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to confirm the model fit and hypothesis testing. The results revealed that social influence was the most influential factor in behavioral intention, followed by attitude. The statistical finding shows no significant influence of facilitating conditions on behavioral intention. In addition, the antecedent of attitude was perceived usefulness. Therefore, the management of universities, lecturers, and marketing partitioners should emphasize building positive direct experience and ensuring benefits from using online learning platforms to formulate favorable attitudes, recommend to other peers, and encourage the usage behavioral intention for university students.

References

Ain, N., Kaur, K. & Waheed, M. (2015). The influence of learning value on learning management system use: an extension of UTAUT2. Information Development, 32(5), 1306-1321.

Ajzen, H. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. PrenticeHall.

Ajzen, I. (1991). Theories of cognitive self-regulation the theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

Alam, M.Z., Hu, W., Hoque, M.R. & Kaium, M.A. (2020). Adoption intention and usage behavior of mHealth services in Bangladesh and China: A cross-country analysis. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 14(1), 37-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPHM-03-2019-0023

Alon, I., Farrell, M. & Li, S. (2020). Regime type and COVID-19 response. FIIB Business Review, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319714520928884

Arbuckle, J. (1995). AMOS: Analysis of Moment Structures User’s Guide. Small Waters.

ARWU. (2019). Best Chinese Universities Ranking • Overall Ranking – 2019. Shanghai Ranking. http://www.shanghairanking.com/Chinese_Universities_Rankings/Overall-Ranking-2019.html

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Sage.

Buabeng-Andoh, C., & Baah, C. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ intention to use learning management system: an integration of UTAUT and TAM. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(4), 455-474. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-02-2020-0028

Chen, C.F. & Tsai, D.C. (2007). How destination image and evaluative factors affect behavioral intentions? Tourism Management, 28(4), 1115-1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.07.007.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. John Wiley & Sons.

Cortez, R. & Johnston, W. (2020). The coronavirus crisis in B2B settings: crisis uniqueness and managerial implications based on social exchange theory. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 125-135.

Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, RP & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.

Dholakia, U.M., Bagozzi, R.P. & Pearo, L.K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network-and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 241-263.

Dos Santos, L.M. & Okazaki, S. (2016). Planned e-learning adoption and occupational socialization in Brazilian higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 1974-1994.

Dragan, D & Topolšek, D. (2014). Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling: Review, Methodology and Practical Applications. Proceedings of the International Conference on Logistics & Sustainable Transport. University of Maribor.

Dulle, F.W. (2015). The suitability of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model in open access adoption studies. Information Development, 27(1), 32-45.

Education. (2021). Online Learning - What Is It And How Does It Work? https://www.educations.com/study-guides/study-online/

Escobar-Rodriguez, T. & Monge-Lozano, P. (2011). The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students. Computers and Education, 58(4), 1085-93.

Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press.

Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.

Fottrell, E. & Byass, P. (2008). Population survey sampling methods in a rural African setting: measuring mortality. Population Health Metrics, 6(1), 2.

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. & Straub, D.W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442-458.

Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Sidek, M. (2017). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker Criterion versus HTMT Criterion. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 890(1).

Hsiao, C.H. & Tang, K.Y. (2014). Explaining undergraduates’ behavior intention of e-textbook adoption: Empirical assessment of five theoretical models. Library Hi Tech, 32(1), 139-163. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-09-2013-0126

Hu, X. & Lai, C. (2019). Comparing factors that influence learning management systems use on computers and on mobile. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(7/8), 468-488. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-12-2018-0127

Ilyas, A. & Zaman, M.K. (2020). An evaluation of online students’ persistence intentions. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 15(2), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-11-2019-0053

Isaias, P., Reis, F., Coutinho, C., & Lencastre, J.A. (2017). Empathic technologies for distance/mobile learning: An empirical research based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(2), 159-180.

Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289343

Kintu, M.J., Zhu, C. & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-20.

Kirat Rai, S., Ramamritham, K. & Jana, A. (2020). Identifying factors affecting the acceptance of government to government system in developing nations – empirical evidence from Nepal. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(2), 283-303. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-05-2019-0035

Lee, C.Y., Tsao, C.H. & Chang, W.C. (2015). The relationship between attitude toward using and customer satisfaction with mobile application services: An empirical study from the life insurance industry. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(5), 680-697. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-07-2014-0077

Mazman, S.G. & Usluel, Y.K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers and Education, 55(2), 444-453.

McKeown, T. & Anderson, M. (2016). UTAUT: capturing differences in undergraduate versus postgraduate learning? Education + Training, 58(9), 945-965. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-07-2015-0058

Nair, P.K., Ali, F. & Leong, L.C. (2015). Factors affecting acceptance and use of ReWIND: validating the extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 12(3), 183-201.

Ndubisi, N.O., Gupta, O.K. & Massoud, S. (2003). Organizational learning and vendor support quality by the usage of application software packages: a study of Asian entrepreneurs. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 12(3), 314-31.

Ngai, E.W.T., Poon, J.K.L. & Chan, Y.H.C. (2007). Empirical examination of adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers and Education, 48(2), 250-67.

Park, S.Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioural intention to use e-Learning. Educational Technology and Society, 12(3), 150-62.

Raman, A. & Don, Y. (2013). Preservice teachers’ acceptance of learning management software: An application of the UTAUT2 model. International Education Studies, 6(7), 157–164.

Rotchanakitumnuai, S. & Speece, M. (2009). Modeling electronic service acceptance of an e‐securities trading system. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(8), 1069-1084. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570910991300

Ryan, B. (2020). What is an online learning platform? iDTech. https://www.idtech.com/blog/what-is-an-online-learning-platform

Santos, J.R.A. (1999). Cronbach’s alpha: a tool for assessing the reliability of scales. Journal of Extension, 37(2), 1-5.

Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online, 8(2), 23-74.

SCU. (n.d.). About SCU. http://en.scu.edu.cn/About_SCU.htm

Singh, A., Sharma, S. & Paliwal, M. (2020). Adoption intention and effectiveness of digital collaboration platforms for online learning: the Indian students’ perspective. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2020-0070

Soper, D. S. (2019). A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models. Daniel Soper. https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calculator.aspx?id=89

SWJTU. (2019). SWJTU at a glance. https://en.swjtu.edu.cn/ABOUT/SWJTU_at_a_Glance.htm

SWPU. (n.d.). Important statistics of Southwest Petroleum University. https://www.swpu.edu.cn/en/index/About_SWPU1/Statistics.htm

SWUFE. (n.d.). SWUFE at a glance. https://e.swufe.edu.cn/ABOUT/SWUFE_AT_A_GLANCE.htm

Tarhini, A., Masa’deh, R., Al-Busaidi, K.A., Mohammed, A.B. & Maqableh, M. (2017). Factors influencing students’ adoption of e-learning: a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of International Education in Business, 10(2), 164-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-09-2016-0032

Teo, T. & Zhou, M. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 124-142.

Textor, C. (2021). Value of online education market in China 2012-2022. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1014491/china-market-size-of-online-education/

UESTC. (n.d.). Why UESTC. https://en.uestc.edu.cn/About_UESTC/Why_UESTC.htm

UIL. (2019). Chengdu, China. Unesco. https://uil.unesco.org/city/chengdu

Venkatesh, V. & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. & Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.

Yi, M., Jackson, J., Park, J. & Probst, J. (2016). Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: toward an integrative view. Information and Management, 43(3), 350-363.

YLM, DR (2020). Covid-19: what does the ‘new normal’ mean? The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/lifestyle/health/2020/05/21/Covid-19-what-does-the-039new-normal039-mean

Zhang, J. (2016). Can MOOCs be interesting to students? An experimental investigation from regulatory focus perspective. Computers and Education, 95, 340-351.

Zhou, Q., Lee, C.S., Sin, S.C.J., Lin, S., Hu, H. & Fahmi Firdaus Bin Ismail, M. (2020). Understanding the use of YouTube as a learning resource: a social cognitive perspective. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(3), 339-359. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-10-2019-0290

Downloads

Published

2022-04-29

How to Cite

Gao, L., Vongurai, R., Phothikitti, K., & Kitcharoen , S. (2022). Factors Influencing University Students’ Attitude and Behavioral Intention Towards Online Learning Platform in Chengdu, China. ABAC ODI JOURNAL Vision. Action. Outcome, 9(2), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.14456/abacodijournal.2022.2