An Exploration of Problem-Solving Style through the lens of Psychological Climate, Cognitive Style and Idea Style Measures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/abacodijournal.2023.24Keywords:
creativity, cognitive style, idea style, change process, innovation, adaption, radical, incremental, problem-solvingAbstract
There is a growing interest in a more inclusive conception of the activity of the ‘change process’ (person, product, process and press) particularly the aspects of the creative sub-process concerned with person and product. The variables Cognitive style and Idea style, have a common heritage that is rooted in a dichotomy concerned at one end with ‘adaption’ (improvements) while at the other end with ‘innovation’ (novelty). These characteristics have been used to describe the ‘creative concept’ where to date the emphasis has been on the pole concerned with ‘innovation continuum’. The pole is hence also concerned with adaption, but while the pole being a necessary and central aspect of both variables has nevertheless received relatively little attention. In this study, the primary objective was therefore to evaluate the coherence of Kirton’s ‘cognitive style’ measure of adaptive – innovative behavioural preferences with the measures of Idea styles. Therefore, another related objective was to evaluate the relationship between the cognitive style and ‘psychological climate’, consisting of ideas generated and problems identified as sub-components. The results show the ‘innovative pole’ of cognitive style is significantly related to both innovative idea style and the quantity of ideas generated (it is also explicitly supported by the facets of the personality variable ‘openness’). However, while a negative relationship between cognitive style and the adaptive style of ideas is a central aspect of Kirton’s cognitive style theory, no significant negative relationship was found. Instead, the adaptive style of ideas has a positive relationship to a factor within the measure of psychological climate or ‘the opportunity to contribute to change’. These findings position Kirton’s cognitive style measure as primarily in the domain of ‘personality’ and only partially coherent with the domain of ‘idea style’ the latter a carrier, rather than ‘a component of style’. Furthermore, while the variables of cognitive style and psychological climate show no significant relationship, they provide differential support to the ‘first two stages’ of the change process.
References
Abdulla, A. M., & Cramond, B. (2018). The creative problem finding hierarchy: A
suggested model for understanding problem finding. Creativity: Theories, Research,
Applications. 5(2), 197-229, https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2018-0019
Adler, P., & Chen, C. (2011). Combining creativity and control: Understanding individual
motivation in large-scale collaborative creativity. Accounting, Organisations and
Society. 36(2), 63-85, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1471341
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference
inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology. (66)5, 950-967.
Avolio, B.J., & Gardner, W.L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: getting to the
root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, (16)3, 315-338.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
Boekhorst, J.A. (2015). The role of authentic leadership in fostering workplace inclusion: a
social information processing perspective. Human Resource Management, (54)2,
-264. http://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21669
Baer, J. (2015). The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity. Roeper Review,
(3), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1047480
Bagozzi, R. P., & Foxall, G. R. (1995). Construct validity and generalisability of the Kirton
Adaption-Innovation Inventory. European Journal of Personality. (9)3, 185-206.
https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410090303
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (Eds). (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through
transformational leadership. Sage Publications Inc.
Beresnevičius, G. (2013). Parameters of the creative product and factors that determine it.
International Business: Innovations, Psychology, Economics. 4(2), 21–53.
Berlin, I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox: An essay on Tolstoy’s view of history.
Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Bunker, B. B., & Alban, B. T. (2006). The handbook of large group method. Jossey-Bass.
Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar
conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space.
Personality and Social Psychology Review, (1)1, 3-25.
Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organisational culture.
Addison-Wesley.
Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: social norms, conformity, and
compliance. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske & G. Lindey (Eds), The handbook of social
psychology (4th ed., pp. 11–92). McGraw-Hill.
Clapp, R. G. (1991). The fate of ideas that aim to stimulate change in a large organisation.
[Unpublished doctoral dissertation], Council for National Academic Awards.
Clapp, R. G. (1993). The stability of cognitive style in adults: A longitudinal study of the
Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Psychological Reports, 73(3, Part 2), 1235-1245. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1993.73.3f.1235
Clapp, R.G., & de Ciantis, S. M. (1989). Adapters and innovators in large organisations:
Does cognitive style characterise actual behaviour of employees at work? An
exploratory study. Psychological Reports, 65, 503-513.
Clapp. R. G. & Ruckthum, V. (2017). The cross-cultural use of the Kirton Adaption-
Innovation Inventory: A further exploration. ABAC, ODI Journal Vision, Action,
Outcome. 4(2), 104. Retrieved from
http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/odijournal/article/view/2657
Clements, L., Redding, E., Lefebvre Sell, N., & May, J. (2018). Expertise in evaluating
choreographic creativity: An online variation of the consensual assessment
technique. Frontiers in Psychology. 9, 1448.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01448
Cooke, R. A., & Szumal, J. L. (1993). Measuring normative beliefs and shared behavioural
expectations in organisations: The reliability and validity of the organisational culture inventory. Psychological Reports, 72(3, Part 2), 1299-1330. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1993.72.3c.1299
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI professional manual. Psychological
Assessment Centre. https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1025708
Cozma, I. (2011). How are individualism and collectivism measured? Romanian Journal of
Applied Psychology, 13(1), 11-17. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/25825697.pdf
Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations:
An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422-1433.
Drucker, P. F. (1969). Management’s new role. Harvard Business Review, 47(6), 49-54.
Gabora, L. (2018). The creative process of cultural evolution. In A. Leung, L. Kwan & S.
Liou (Eds.), Handbook of culture and creativity: Basic processes and applied innovations (pp.33-60). Oxford University Press.
Gelade, G. A. (2002). Creative style, personality and creative endeavor. Genetic, Social and
General Psychology Monographs. 128(3), 213-234. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-06393-004
Gilson, L., Lim, H. S., D’Innocenzo, L., & Moye, N. (2012). One size does not fit all:
Managing radical and incremental creativity. The Journal of Creative Behaviour, 46(3), 168–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.12
Gilson, L. L., & Madjar, N. (2010). Radical and incremental creativity: Antecedents and
processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0017863
Goldratt, E. M. (1990). Theory of constraints. North River Press.
Goncalo, J.A, & Staw, B.M. (2006). Individualism-collectivism and group creativity.
Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 100(1), 96-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.11.003
Gorodnichenko, Y., & Roland, G. (2011). Which dimensions of culture matter for long-run
growth? American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 101(3), 492-498.
Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T.
(2006). Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 281–294.
Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational
principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1–46.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related
values. Sage Publications Inc.
Hogan J., Murdock, K., Hamill, M., Lanzara, A., & Winner, E. (2018). Looking at the
process: Examining creative and artistic thinking in fashion designers on a reality television show. Frontiers of Psychology. 9:2008. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02008
Jansen, W. S., Otten, S., Van Der Zee, K. I., & Jans, L. (2014). Inclusion: Conceptualization
and measurement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2011
Kaufman. S. B., Quilty. L. C., Grazioplene R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J.R., Peterson, J. B., &
DeYoung, C. G. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality Apr; 84(2), 248-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12156
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of
creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12.
Kelly, G. A. (1963). Theory of personality (Vol. 1). Norton.
Kirton, M. J. (1961). Management initiative. Acton Society Trust.
Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622-629. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622
Kirton, M. J. (1999). Manual of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory (KAI) 3rd
Edition. KAI Distribution Centre, U.K., (reprinted with amendments).
Kirton, M. J. (2011). Adaption-innovation in the context of diversity and change. Routledge.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolution (2nd Edition), University of
Chicago Press.
Madjar, N., Greenberg, E., & Chen, Z. (2011). Factors for radical creativity, Incremental
creativity, and routine, non-creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 730–743.
Malik, M. A., Choi, J. N., & Butt, A. N. (2019). Distinct effects of intrinsic motivation and
extrinsic rewards on radical and incremental creativity: The moderating role of goal orientations. Journal of Organisational Behaviour. 20(9-10), 2013-1026.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition,
emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review. 98, 224–253.
Marsden, T. (2016). What is the true cost of attrition? Strategic HR Review, 15(4), 189-190.
https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-05-2016-0039.
Meynhart, T., Hermann, C., & Anderer, S. (2017). Making sense of a most popular
metaphor in management: Towards a HedgeFox Scale for cognitive styles. Journal of Administrative, 7(3), 1-23.
Paletz, S B & Peng, K (2009) Problem Finding and Contradiction: Examining the
Relationship between Naive Dialectical Thinking, Ethnicity and Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 21(2–3), 139–151.
Reiter-Palmon, R. (2009a). A dialectic perspective on problem identification and
construction. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2(3), 349–352.
Reiter-Palmon, R., Illies, J. J., & Kobe-Cross, L. M. (2009b). Conscientiousness is not
always a good predictor of performance: The case of creativity. Psychology Faculty Publications. 20. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/psychfacpub/20
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310.
Roccas S., Sagiv L., Schwartz S. H., & Knafo A. (2002) The big 5 personality factors and
personal values, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 89-801.
Ruckthum, V., & Clapp, R. (2008). Using individual creativity to improve the performance of
large organisations. AU-GSB e-journal, 1(1), 38-46. Retrieved from http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/AU-GSB/article/view/382
Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502
Schneider, B. (1975). Organisational climates: An essay. Personnel Psychology, 28, 447-479.
Schneider, B. (1987). People make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
Shao, Y., Zhang, C., Zhou, J., Gu, T., & Yuan, Y. (2019). How does culture shape
creativity? A mini-review. Front. Psychol. 10,1219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01219
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construal.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580-591.
Stacy, R. (2012). Tools and techniques of leadership and management. Meeting the
challenge of complexity. Routledge.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms.
In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). Cambridge University Press.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical
advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (25, pp. 1-65). Academic Press.
Tetlock, P. E. 2005. Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know?
Princeton University Press.
Tetlock, P. E. (2017). Expert political judgement. Princeton University Press.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition.
Harvard University Press.
Van der Molen, P. P. (1994). Adaption-innovation and changes in social structure: On the
anatomy of catastrophe. In M. J. Kirton (Ed), Adaptors and innovators: Styles of creativity and problem-solving. International Thompson Press.
Vernon. D., Hocking. I., & Tyler, T. (2016). An evidence-based review of creative problem-
solving tools: A practitioner’s resource. Human Resource Development Review, 15(2), 1–30.
Von Wittich, D., & Antonakis, J. (2011). The KAI Cognitive Style Inventory: Was it
personality all along? Personality and Individual Differences. 50(7), 1044-1049.
Yao, X., Wang, S., Dang, J., & Wang, L. (2012). The role of individualism-collectivism in
the individual creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 24(4), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.730001
Yilman, S. (2020). The ambidextrous personality and situation - A trait interaction approach
to ambidexterity, radical and incremental creativity. Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus University.
Zabelina, D. L., Colzato, L., Beeman, M., & Hommel, B. (2016). Dopamine and the
creative mind: Individual differences in creativity are predicted by interactions between dopamine genes. DAT and COMT. PLoS ONE, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146768
Zhang, J., Ji, M., Anwar, M., Li, Q., & Fu, G. (2018). Cross-level impact of team goal
orientation and individual goal orientation on individual creativity. Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management. 25(5), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.6
Zohar, D. (2014). Safety climate: Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement. In B.
Schneider & K. M. Barbera (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of organizational climate and culture (pp. 317–334). Oxford University Press.
