A Model of Transactional Negotiation of Meaning

Authors

  • Ernest Michael Seely Theodore Maria School of Arts Assumption University, Thailand

Keywords:

Strategic competence, Transactional competence, Language related episodes, Communication strategies, Directives

Abstract

Transactional competence as related to strategic competence, and ultimately communicative competence, is a rarely studied phenomenon regarding linguistics. Most literature on transactions focuses on the mechanics of business transactions and tends to gloss over what happens linguistically in such transactions. Therefore, as original research, this study posits A Model of Transactional Negotiation of Meaning that demonstrates the relevance of Strategic Competence within transactional communication. By analyzing the directive function of language within the context of Referential Communication, the model herein lays out the basis of discovery where miscommunication, as the result of Language Related Episodes (LREs), is addressed by Communication Strategies (CSs). Ten international university students demonstrated their Transactional Competence by navigating the completion of a closed task. The results demonstrated procedural breakdowns of the transactional process where achievement strategies such as asking for clarification or confirmation, interactional strategies, and maintenance strategies were needed to remediate problematic communication. It is believed that the transactional model herein is an excellent resource for discovering Language Related Episodes and the use of communication strategies found in common miscommunications. The model demonstrates that LREs are primarily referential and that establishing common reference points is crucial to competent transactional communication.  

References

Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dornyei, Z. & Scott, M. L. (1997). Review article communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning, 47(1), 173-210.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jarvis, P. & Pavlenko, A. (2007). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.

Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Krippendorf, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nakatani, Y. (2005). The effects of awareness-raising training on oral communication strategy use. The Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 76–91. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3588552

Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Seely, E.M. (2019a). An investigation of the transactional competence of international university students performing task-based communication. THAITESOL Journal, 32(1), 16-32.

Seely, E.M. (2019b). Proceedings from ICSAI 3/2019: 13th International conference on language, innovation, culture, and education. Bangkok, Thailand.

Schepens, J. Slik, F. & Hout, R. (2015). L1 and L2 Distance Effects in Learning L3 Dutch. Language Learning, 66(1), 224-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12150

Shortreed, I. (1993). Variation in Foreign Language Talk: The Effects of Task and Efficiency. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 96-122). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x

Tarone, E. (1980). Communication strategies, foreigner talk, and repair in interlanguage. Language Learning, 30(2), 417-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00326.x

Tenbrink, T., Andonova, E., Schole, G., & Coventry, K.R. (2017). Communicative success in spatial dialogue: The impact of functional features and dialogue strategies. Language and Speech, 60(2), 318-329. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0023830916651097

Wen, Z., Mota, M.B., & McNeill, A. (Eds.). (2015). Working memory in second language acquisition and processing. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Yule, G. (1997). Referential communication tasks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-28

Issue

Section

Research articles