The Needs of Air Cadets in An English Speaking Course
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigated the needs of air cadets (n = 362) in an English speaking course. The research was initiated to investigate the cadets’ needs in learning to speak English to inform the development of a new English speaking course in a particular military context where English is used for specific military purposes. Data on needs were collected by using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Cadets were asked to fill out a needs analysis questionnaire relating to course content, teaching methodologies and activities. Then, 32 cadets were randomly selected and interviewed to explore specific issues arising from an analysis of the questionnaire data. The analysis of data revealed that the cadets needed to study with a good-natured teacher who did not place them in stressful situations and who didn’t focus too much on scores and textbooks. They needed a teacher who provided equal opportunities for everyone to speak and who could apply authentic materials to classroom learning activities. They also needed to learn English conversation in various contexts such as everyday life, military situations, presentations and when attending international conferences. Adequate time for practicing was also needed. The implications of these findings for course development in spoken English are also briefly summarized.
Article Details
References
Ahmadi, S. M. & Leong, L.-M. (2017). An analysis of factors influencing learners’ English speaking skill. International Journal of Research in English Education. 2(1), 34-41.
Albassri, I. A. (2016). Needs-Analysis-Informed Teaching for English for Specific Purposes. Master of Arts in Education, Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages, California State University, San Bernardino.
Al-Hamlan, S. & Baniabdelrahman, A. A. (2015). A needs analysis approach to EFL syllabus development for second grade students in secondary education in Saudi Arabia: A descriptive analytical approach to students’ needs. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(1), 118-145.
Ariyanti, A. (2016). Psychological factors affecting EFL students’ speaking performance. ASIAN TEFL, 1(1), 77-88.
Boroujeni, S.A. & Fard, F.M. (2013). A needs analysis of English for specific purposes (ESP) course for adoption of communicative language teaching: A case of Iranian first-year students of educational administration. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2(6), 35-44.
Brown, J. D. (2009). Foreign and second language needs analysis. In: M. H. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 269-293). Oxford: Blackwell.
Jie, C. (2013). English learner needs analysis: a case study of Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology (BIPT). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(1), 178-182.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Lathifah, S. (2015). Affective issues in speaking faced by English and accounting department students (A case study of the second semester English and accounting department students of Semarang State University in the academic year of 2014 - 2015). A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Sarjana Pendidikan in English. English Department Faculty of Languages and Arts, Semarang State University.
Mahripah, S. (2014). Exploring Factors Affecting EFL Learners’ Speaking Performance: From Theories to Practice. Proceedings from the 3rd UAD TEFL International Conference. Yogyakarta. Organized by English Education Department, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan.
Nation, I.S.P. & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. New York: Routledge.
Subandowo, D. (2017). The language interference in English speaking skill for EFL learners. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research Journal, 110, 204-208.
Tarigan, H. G. (1990). Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Sastra. Bandung: PT Aksara.
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.