Analysis of Attitudinal Resources in an EFL University Classroom Talk in the Deep South of Thailand: An Appraisal Perspective

Main Article Content

Cheewala Badklang
Udomkrit Srinon

Abstract

This study presents the analysis of a sample of a classroom discourse from an English language for communication and learning class in a Thai university in the southernmost Thailand. The analysis of resources in this paper is based on the Appraisal theory (Martin, 1992; 2000; Martin & Rose, 2003; Martin & White, 2005). The Appraisal theory was developed from the Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) theory originated by Michael Halliday (Halliday, 1994; Halliday & Matthiessen, 2004; Thompson, 2014). The objective of this study is to investigate the linguistic resources within the classroom talk, especially while the teacher and students are interacting and expressing their attitudinal meanings. The participants in the study were a Muslim male teacher and 32 undergraduates. The data were taken from classroom recordings of the discourse, and transcription of the same discourse. This paper used functional analysis taken from the Attitude system of the Appraisal theory which provides three types of attitudes (affect, judgement, and appreciation). The findings show that the teacher and students expressed all three kinds of attitudes, judgement, appreciation, and affect and they expressed positive rather than negative attitudes which conform to the literature and the appraisal framework. This indicates that using the framework works well in some degree to analyze the context of the classroom talk which leads to better understanding and how we apply it to the context of language teaching and learning development by ways of critical classroom discourse. The analysis also illustrates how the classroom relationships between the teacher and students are constructed. The study provides and suggests some insights into how the Appraisal theory plays out in the sample of classroom discourse and its implications. 

Keywords: Appraisal, Deep South of Thailand, Systemic Functional Linguistics, Thai EIL Classroom Talk

Article Details

Section
Research articles
Author Biographies

Cheewala Badklang, Kasetsart University Yala Rajabhat University

Cheewala Badklang is currently a lecturer in English Education Department, Faculty of Humanity and Social sciences, Yala Rajabhat University. She graduated Master degree in ELT and now she is a PhD student in Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakorn Patom. Her research interests are in classroom interaction, discourse analysis, Systemic Functional Linguistics and Appraisal theory, and learner behaviors.

Udomkrit Srinon, Kasetsart University

Udomkrit Srinon, PhD is currently a senior lecturer in the School of English, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakorn Patom. His research interests and expertise are Systemic Functional Linguistics which includes functional grammar, student writing, literacy development, text evaluation (Appraisal), classroom discourse analysis and genre based pedagogy.

References

Arphattananon, T. (2011). Education for culturally diverse students in Thailand: The case of Muslim students in the southernmost provinces. The International Journal of Learning, 17, 497–510.

Arunsirot, S. (2012). The use of appraisal theory to analyze Thai newspaper commentaries. MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities Regular, 15(1), 70-89.

Christie, F. (2000). The language of classroom interaction and learning. In L. Unsworth, Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspectives (pp. 184 - 203). NY: Cassell.

Chu, C. P. (2014). Supporting new arrival students' engagement with picture books: analysis of teacher talk using the appraisal theory. Functional Linguistics, 2(12), 1-17.

Cook, V. (2000). Second language learning and language teaching (Ed. 2th). Beijing: Foreign language teaching and research press.

Cullen, R. (2002). Supportive Teacher Talk: the Importance of the F-move. ELT Journal, 56, 117-127.

Derewianka, B. (2007). Using appraisal theory to track interpersonal develpment in adolescent academic writing. In R. Whittaker, M. O'Donnell, & A. McCabe, Advances in language and education (pp. 143-165). London: Continuum.

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development. L2 Journal, 1, 1-18.

Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (1997). Analysing casual conversation. London: Equinox Plubishing Ltd.

Gattullo, F. (2000). Corrective feedback and teaching style: Exploring a relationship. In Moon, J. and Nikolov, M. (Eds.). Research into English Teaching for Young Learners. Pecs: University of Pec Press.

Gharbavi, A & Iravani, H. (2014). Is Teacher Talk Pernicious to Students? A Discourse Analysis of Teacher Talk. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98, 552 – 561

Hall, J. K., & Walsh, M. (2002). Teacher-student interaction and language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22, 186-203.

Halliday, M. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.

Halliday, M. A., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Hodder Arnold.

Hong, Q. (2012). Investigating Translators' Ositioning via Appraisal Theory: A Case Study of the Q&A Part of a Speech Delivered by the U.S. Vice President Cheney. Sino-US English Teaching, 9(12), 1775-1787.

Howell, P.B., Thomas, S. & Ardasheva,Y. (2011). Talk in the Classroom: Meeting the Developmental, Academic and Cultral Needs of Middle School Students. Middle Grades Research Journal, 6(1), 47–63

Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation in text: authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Khuvasanond, K. (2013). The Effects of Teacher Versus Student Centered Instructional Strategies on the Vocabulary Learning of Six Grade Thai Students. Kansas: University of Kansas.

Lai, J. (2010). Interpersonal Functions of EFL Teachers' Evaluative Discourse. International Education Studies, 3(2), 167-173.

Liow, J. C. (2009). Islam, education and reform in Southern Thailand: Tradition and transformation. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Madeeyoh, C., & Charumanee, N. (2013). The use of Islamic context texts to improve Muslim students' English reading skills. Journal of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University, 5(2), 46-58.

Madmarn, H. (2003). Secular education, values and development in the context of Islam in Thailand: An outlook on Muslim attitudes toward Thai educational policy. In Syed Farid Alatas, Lim Teck Ghee & Kazuhide, K. (Eds.), Asian Interfaith Dialogue:Perspectives on Religion, Education and Social Cohesion (pp. 66–77). Singapore: Centre for Research on Islamic and Malay Affairs & The World Bank.

Martin, J. (1992). English text. System and structure. Philadadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Martin, J. (2000). Beyond exchang: apprailsal system in English. In S. Hunston, & G. Thompson, Evaluation in text: authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University.

Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: meaning beyond the clause. The 2nd edition. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Martin, J., & White, P. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave.

Ministry of Education Thailand, (2008). Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551(A.D. 2008). Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/curricula/thailand/th_befw_2008_eng.pdf

Nomnian, S. (2013). Review of English Language Basic Education Core Curriculum: Pedagogical Implication for Thai Primary Level Teachers of English. Kasatsart J. (Soc.Sci)(34), 583-589.

Nookua, S. (2012). The Patterns of Language Use in the Southernmost Provinces of Thailand. Cultural Approach, 12 (22), 26-35.

Noor, N., Aman, I., Mustaffa, R. & Seong, T. (2010). Teacher's verbal feedback on students' response: a Malaysian ESL classroom discourse analysis. Procedia social and behavioral sciences, 7 (C), 398-405.

Nunn, R. (2001). 'Language learning across boundaries-Negotiating classroom rituals. Retrieved from http://www.-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej18/al.html.

Park, C. C. (2000). Learning Style Preferences of Southeast Asian Students. Newbury Park: Corwin Press, Incorporated

Poynton, C.K. (1990). Address and the Semiotics of Social Relations: A systemic-functional account of address forms and practices in Australian English (Doctoral thesis). Linguistics Department, University of Sydney, Australia.

Premsrirat, S., & Uniansasmita, S. (2012). Planning and implementing Patani Malay in bilingual education in Southern Thailand. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 5, 85-96.

Ran, Q. & Danli, L. (2016). Teacher's feedback on students' performance in a secondary EFL classroom. Proceedings of ClaSIC 2016, National University of Singapore.

Rappa, A.L. & Wee L. (2006). Language Policy and Modernity in Southeast Asia

(Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand). USA: Springer

Sateemae, S., Abdel-Monem, T., & Sateemae, M. (2015). Religiosity and Social Problems Among Muslim Adolescents in Southen Thailand. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 9(2), 3-24.

Shomoossi, N. (2004). The Effect of Teacher’s Questioning Behavior on EFL Classroom Interaction: A Classroom Research Study. The Reading Matrix, 4 (2), 96-104

Sisamouth, W. K. & Che Lah, S. (2015). Attitudes towards Thai, Patani Malay, and English of Thai Undergraduates: A Case Study at Prince of Songkla University Pattani Campus, Thailand. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 208, 240 – 252

Songsukrujiroad, S., Chaiyasuk, T., & Praphan, P. (2015). Appraisal analysis: Thailand in the view of Phnom Penh Post on the Preah Vihear issue. Thammasat Review, 18(2), 1-18.

Souza, A. (2006). The construal of interpersonal meanings in the discourse of national athems: an appraisal analysis. The 33rd International Systemic Functional Congress Proceedings , 531-550.

Srinon, U. (2017). A Study of Thai Postgraduate Students’ Authorial Voices in Writing Research Proposals: Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(8).

Srisueb, P., & Wasanasomsithi, P. (2010). A needs analysis of secondary school students learning English as a third language in Islamic religious schools in Narathiwat province. Princess of Naradhiwas University Journal, 2(3), 84-98.

Suhrke, A. (1970). The Thai Muslims: Some aspects of minority integration. Pacific Affairs, 43, 531–547. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2754903

Thompson, G. (2014). Introducting Functional Grammar. The 3rd edition. London & New York: Routledge.

Uniansasmita, S. (2010). Language for communication in local mass media in three southern boder provinces. Journal of Language and Culture,29(2), 69-87.

Wiriyachitra, A. (2002). English Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand in the Decade. Thai TESOL Focus, 15(1), 4-9.

Wongwanich, S., Sakolrak, S. and Piromsombat, C. (2014). Needs for Thai Teachers to Become a Reflective Teacher: Mixed Methods Needs Assessment Research. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116, 1645 – 1650

Xiao-yan, M. (2006). Teacher talk and EFL in university classrooms:M.A. dissertation. School of Foreign language and literature. Chongqing: Chongqiung Normal University and Yangtze Normal University.

Yulaiti,. (2013). Interpersonal Meaning Negotiation in the Teacher-Student Verbal Interaction. The International Journal of Social Sciences, 11 (1). Retrieved from https://www.tijoss.com/TIJOSS%2011th%20Volume/Yuliati7.pdf