Peer Feedback and Feedforward towards EFL Argumentative Writing

Authors

  • Rittu Gambhir Language Institute Thammasat University
  • Supong Tangkiengsirisin Language Institute Thammasat University

Keywords:

argumentative writing, feed forward, peer feedback

Abstract

This study aims to understand the main types of feedback peers use in an argumentative writing class at a private university in Thailand; and investigates the attitudes of the 30 EFL students towards peer feedback and feedforward. Peer feedback was provided on the draft and final versions of two argumentative essays assigned by the teacher. The types of comments provided by the peer on the peer feedback form, memo and essay were collected and analyzed quantitatively. Questionnaire was used to collect quantitative data investigating learner’s attitude towards peer feedback and feedforward; and semi-structured interviews with learners was undertaken to triangulate the study. The results revealed that the type of instruments used for giving feedback had an impact on the peer feedback and type of comments. The maximum number of comments was found in the feedback form followed by memo and essay. Praise was the most common type of comment followed by advice and critique. Comments related to recognizing progress for improvement as well as advice towards future assignment, were prevalent in the final versions of both essays; such comments enabled learners take peer comments forward into the subsequent assignment. Feedforward did facilitate learners to set their goals; results of findings revealed improvement in the goals set by learners. Learners responded positively towards peer feedback and feedforward indicating that the act of receiving and giving peer feedback and feedforward helped improve the argumentative essay. 

References

Berg, E. C. (1999). Preparing ESL students for peer response. Tesol Journal, 8(2), 20-25.

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,38(6), 698-712.

Chala Bejarano, P. A., & Chapetón, C. M. (2013). The role of genre-based activities in the writing of argumentative essays in EFL. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 15(2), 127-147.

Coffin, C. (2004). Arguing about how the world is or how the world should be: the role of argument in IELTS tests. Journal of English for Academic Purposes,3(3), 229-246.

De Rycker, A., & Ponnudurai, P. (2011). The effect of online reading on argumentative essay writing quality. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 11(3), 147-162

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT journal,63(2), 97-107.

Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of educational research, 83(1), 70-120.

Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Ferris, D. (2007). Preparing teachers to respond to student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 165-193.

Hananta N. (2015). RJES 2(1), January – June 2015

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.

Hughes, G. (2011). Towards a personal best: A case for introducing ipsative assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 353-367.

Hughes, G., Smith, H., & Creese, B. (2015). Not seeing the wood for the trees: developing a feedback analysis tool to explore feedforward in modularised programmes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,40(8), 1079-1094.

Hughes, G., Wood, E., & Kitagawa, K. (2014). Use of self-referential (ipsative) feedback to motivate and guide distance learners. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(1), 31-44

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of second language writing, 10(3), 185-212.

Jacobs, H. L. (1981). Testing ESL Composition: A Practical Approach. English Composition Program. Newbury House Publishers, Inc., Rowley, MA 01969.

Jones, D. (2011). Feedback in Academic Writing: Using Feedback to Feed-Forward10. Research and Practice in English Language Teaching in Asia, 175.

Kaur, S. (2015). Teaching Strategies Used by Thai EFL Lecturers to Teach Argumentative Writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 208, 143-156.

Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of educational research, 47(2), 211-232.

Lantolf, J. P. & Appel, G. (eds.) (1994). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Larson, M., Britt, M. A., & Larson, A. A. (2004). Disfluencies in comprehending argumentative texts. Reading Psychology, 25(3), 205-224.

Leki, I. (1990b). Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes. CATESOL Journal, 3, 5-19.

Lightbown, P. M., Spada, N., Ranta, L., & Rand, J. (1999). How languages are learned (Vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Liu, M., & Chai, Y. (2009). Attitudes towards peer review and reaction to peer feedback in Chinese EFL writing classrooms. TESL Reporter, 42(1), 33-51.

Liu, J., & Hansen, J. G. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Liu, J., & Sadler, R. W. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for academic Purposes, 2(3), 193-227.

Mangelsdorf, K. (1992). Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think? ELT Journal, 46, 274–284.

Moore, M. (2011). Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development, pp 1549-1550

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.

Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (2011). Feedback alignment: effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 125-136.

Qi, Y. (2004). The role of feedback in English writing. FLTA, 1, 47-52

Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 28(1), 4-13.

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional science, 18(2), 119-144.

Sadler, D. R. (2010) Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535-550

Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2010). Promoting cohesion in EFL expository writing : A Study of graduate students in Thailand. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 3(16), 1-34.

Tangkitvanich, S., & Sasiwuttiwat, S. (2012). Revamping the Thai education system: Quality for all. TDRI Quarterly Review, 27(2), 3-14.

Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Tsai, Y. C., & Chuang, M. T. (2013). Fostering revision of argumentative writing through structured peer assessment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 116(1), 210-221.

Vardi, I. (2013). Effectively feeding forward from one written assessment task to the next. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(5), 599-610.

Wingate, U. (2012). ‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 145-154.

Yeh, H. C., & Yang, Y. F. (2011). Prospective teachers’ insights towards scaffolding students’ writing processes through teacher–student role reversal in an online system. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(3), 351-368

Downloads

Published

2017-09-12

Issue

Section

Research articles