Impact of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Performance on Firm Performance in Thailand Stock Exchange: Interaction Effect of Managerial Efficiency

Main Article Content

Penprapak Manapreechadeelert
Kusuma Dampitakse
Sungworn Ngudgratoke

Abstract

This study aims to use stakeholder-agency theory to investigate the relationship between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and firm performance (measured by ROA and Tobin’s Q) in the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), with a particular focus on whether managerial efficiency has a moderating effect on this relationship. The sample for this study comprised all companies listed in the SET from 2016 to 2021, resulting in a total of 2,104 firm-year observations. The PROCESS analysis technique developed by Hayes (2013) was utilized to analyze the data.


The study found that there was no significant impact of ESG performance on firm performance. However, when considering managerial efficiency, the relationship between ESG performance and firm performance becomes stronger and positive. This moderating effect of managerial efficiency has been neglected in previous research, making this study a valuable contribution to the ESG literature. These findings indicate that both managerial effectiveness and ESG performance should be viewed as interdependent aspects of effective stakeholder management. Moreover, the study emphasizes the importance of implementing ESG regulations in Thailand to encourage sustainable development.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Aboud, A., & Diab, A. (2018). The impact of social, environmental and corporate governance disclosures on firm value. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(4), 442–458.

Alareeni, B. A., & Hamdan, A. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(7), 1409–1428.

Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., Kolade, N., & Gerged, A. M. (2020). ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(3), 429–444.

Alsayegh, M. F., Abdul Rahman, R., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), 3910.

Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87–103.

Andreou, P., Ehrlich, D., Karasamani, I., & Louca, C. (2015). Managerial Ability and Firm Performance: Evidence from the Global Financial Crisis. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Bhandari, K. R., & Salo, M. R., Jari. (2022). The resource-based view, stakeholder capitalism, ESG, and sustainable competitive advantage: The firm’s embeddedness into ecology, society, and governance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1525–1537.

Bodhanwala, S., & Bodhanwala, R. (2023). Environmental, social and governance performance: Influence on market value in the COVID-19 crisis. Management Decision, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2022-1084

Bombardier Inc. (2021). Environmental, social and governance report (ESG). https://bombardier.com/en/system/files?file=2022-05/Bombardier-ESG-Report-2021.pdf

Chen, J., & Chen, J. (2020). Does managerial ability affect the quality of environmental financial disclosure? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(6), 1055–1073.

Chiu, I. H. (2022). The EU sustainable finance agenda: Developing governance for double materiality in sustainability metrics. European Business Organization Law Review, 23(1), 87–123.

Cox, J. S. (2017). Managerial ability, growth opportunities, and IPO performance. Managerial Finance, 43(4), 488–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-07-2016-0218

Del Gesso, C., & Lodhi, R. N. (2024). Theories underlying environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: A systematic review of accounting studies. Journal of Accounting Literature, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-08-2023-0143

Demerjian, P. R., Lev, B., & McVay, S. E. (2012). Quantifying Managerial Ability: A New Measure and Validity Tests. Management Science, 58(7), 1229–1248.

Dkhili, H. (2023). Does environmental, social and governance (ESG) affect market performance? The moderating role of competitive advantage. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).

Duque-Grisales, E., & Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), 315–334.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.

Gao, D., Li, S., & Zhou, Y. (2024). Investment efficiency, ESG performance and corporate performance: Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises. Chinese Management Studies, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-06-2022-0210

García‐Sánchez, I., Aibar‐Guzmán, B., Aibar‐Guzmán, C., & Azevedo, T. (2020). CEO ability and sustainability disclosures: The mediating effect of corporate social responsibility performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1565–1577.

Gurol, B., & Lagasio, V. (2023). Women board members’ impact on ESG disclosure with environment and social dimensions: Evidence from the European banking sector. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(1), 211–228.

Haque, F. (2017). The effects of board characteristics and sustainable compensation policy on carbon performance of UK firms. The British Accounting Review, 49(3), 347–364.

Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics. The Econometric Society, 46(6), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827

Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. The Guilford Press.

Hu, J., Jiang, H., & Holmes, M. (2019). Government subsidies and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review, 41, 100658.

Inam Bhutta, A., Sheikh, M. F., Munir, A., Naz, A., & Saif, I. (2021). Managerial ability and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging market. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1879449.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Agency Costs and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Junius, D., Adisurjo, A., Rijanto, Y. A., & Adelina, Y. E. (2020). The impact of ESG performance to firm performance and market value. Jurnal Aplikasi Akuntansi, 5(1), 21–41

Kao, M.-F., Jian, C.-H., & Tseng, C.-H. (2024). Managerial ability and voluntary ESG disclosure and assurance: Evidence from Taiwan. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(1), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2022-0428

Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724.

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th ed. (pp. xvii, 534). Guilford Press.

Lee, J., Kim, S., & Kim, E. (2023). The effect of managerial ability on voluntary disclosure of carbon emissions. Borsa Istanbul Review.

Mayer, C. (2021). The future of the corporation and the economics of purpose. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 887–901.

Maji, S. G., & Lohia, P. (2023). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance and firm performance in India. Society and Business Review, 18(1), 175–194.

Melinda, A., & Wardhani, R. (2020). The Effect of Environmental, Social, Governance, and Controversies on Firms’ Value: Evidence from Asia. In W. A. Barnett & B. S. Sergi (Eds.), Advanced Issues in the Economics of Emerging Markets (Vol. 27, pp. 147–173). Emerald Publishing Limited.

Muaaz, H., & Ali, M. (2024). Sustainability and ESG Integration. In M. Ali, L. Choi-Meng, C.-H. Puah, S. A. Raza, & P. Sivanandan (Eds.), Strategic Financial Management (pp. 13–33). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83608-106-720241002

Naciti, V., Cesaroni, F., & Pulejo, L. (2022). Corporate governance and sustainability: A review of the existing literature. Journal of Management and Governance, 1–20.

Napoletano, E., & Curry, B. (2022). Environmental, Social And Governance: What Is ESG Investing? https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/esg-investing/

Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403–445.

Phan, N. H. (2021). Managerial ability, managerial incentives and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 193–200.

Rezaee, Z. (2016). Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective. Journal of Accounting Literature, 36(1), 48–64.

SEC. (2023). CG Thailand for sustainability of business and society. https://www.sec.or.th/cgthailand/EN/Pages/CGCode/CGCodeIntroduction.aspx

SET. (2019). SET’s Supplier Code of Conduct. https://bit.ly/3RdCBIY

SET. (2022). Sustainable Procurement. https://supplychainguru.co.th/articles/ sustainability/what-is-sustainable-procurement-and-its-importance/

SET. (2023). Sustainability disclosure & reporting. https://www.setsustainability.com/ page/disclosure

Shao, D., Zhao, S., Wang, S., & Jiang, H. (2020). Impact of CEOs’ Academic Work Experience on Firms’ Innovation Output and Performance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Sustainability, 12(8), 7442.

Shehata, N. F. (2014). Theories and determinants of voluntary disclosure. Accounting and Finance Research (AFR), 3(1).

Simamora, A. J. (2023). Firms performance, risk taking and managerial ability. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(3), 789–808. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2021-0172

Stein, J. (2003). Agency, information and corporate investment. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1.

Sun, L. (2017). Managerial ability and chemical releases. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(3), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2016-0062

Tampakoudis, I., Noulas, A., Kiosses, N., & Drogalas, G. (2021). The effect of ESG on value creation from mergers and acquisitions. What changed during the COVID-19 pandemic? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(6), 1117–1141.

Ting, I. W. K., Tebourbi, I., Lu, W.-M., & Kweh, Q. L. (2021). The effects of managerial ability on firm performance and the mediating role of capital structure: Evidence from Taiwan. Financial Innovation, 7, 1–23.

United Nations. (2019). Guidance on core indicators for entity reporting on contribution towards implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Publications. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/diae2019d1_en.pdf

Utz, S., Wimmer, M., Hirschberger, M., & Steuer, R. E. (2014). Tri-criterion inverse portfolio optimization with application to socially responsible mutual funds. 60 Years Following Harry Markowitz’s Contribution to Portfolio Theory and Operations Research, 234(2), 491–498.

Velte, P. (2020). Does CEO power moderate the link between ESG performance and financial performance? Management Research Review, 43(5), 497–520.

Viererbl, B., & Koch, T. (2022). The paradoxical effects of communicating CSR activities: Why CSR communication has both positive and negative effects on the perception of a company’s social responsibility. Public Relations Review, 48(1), 102134.

Wang, N., Pan, H., Feng, Y., & Du, S. (2023). How do ESG practices create value for businesses? Research review and prospects. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).

Welch, K., & Yoon, A. (2022). Do high-ability managers choose ESG projects that create shareholder value? Evidence from employee opinions. Review of Accounting Studies. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3616486

World Economic Forum. (2015). Beyond supply chains—Empowering responsible value chains. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_BeyondSupplyChains_Report2015.pdf

World Economic Forum. (2021). The Global Risks Report 2021, 16th Edition. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/global-risks-report-2021-16th-edition-insight-report?gclid=CjwKCAjw__ihBhADEiwAXEazJqcL2M8CeFVxhIf7qE0m0hC4FmJEU9jmodcf4h-NkzkSqx4Qe7FDshoChOIQAvD_BwE

Xu, Q., Fernando, G. D., & Schneible, R. A. (2022). Age diversity, firm performance and managerial ability. Review of Accounting and Finance, 21(4), 276–298.

Yoo, S., & Managi, S. (2022). Disclosure or action: Evaluating ESG behavior towards financial performance. Finance Research Letters, 44, 102108.

Zhang, H. (2023). Are CEOs rewarded for managerial ability? Evidence from nonprofit hospitals. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).