Examining Students’ Behavioral Intention and Actual Usage Of Mixed Painting Education: A Case of an Art School in Chengdu, China

Authors

  • Xiaoyan Zhan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/shserj.2024.73
CITATION
DOI: 10.14456/shserj.2024.73
Published: 2024-12-18

Keywords:

Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Attitude, Social Influence, Behavioral Intention

Abstract

Purpose: This research delves into the determinants influencing students' behavioral intention and actual usage of mixed painting education in the city of Chengdu, China. The conceptual framework employed for this investigation encompasses several key factors: perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude, social influence, facilitation conditions, behavioral intention, and actual usage. Research Design, Data, and Methodology: The researcher focused on 500 respondents of 6-8-year-old primary school students and their parents. When gathering data and administering surveys, the employed sampling techniques include purposive sampling, quota sampling, and convenience sampling. Prior to data collection, a pilot test involving 50 participants was conducted to assess the index of item-objective congruence (IOC) and Cronbach's Alpha. Subsequently, data analysis was conducted using structural equation modeling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to evaluate model fit, reliability, and validity. Results: The impact of perceived ease of use on perceived usefulness is substantial. Both perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use have a significant influence on attitude. Furthermore, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, social influence, and facilitating conditions collectively exert a significant influence on behavioral intention. Ultimately, behavioral intention emerges as a key driver of actual usage. Conclusion: These insights are crucial market information that training institution managers need to understand.

Author Biography

Xiaoyan Zhan

Jintang Branch School of Chengdu Normal Affiliated Primary School, China.

References

Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitude structure and behavior. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 241–274). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888-918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888

Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2017). Factors influencing adoption of mobile banking by Jordanian bank customers: Extending UTAUT2 with trust. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijinfomgt.2017.01.002

Allport, G. (1935). Attitudes. In C. A. Murchinson (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology (pp.798-844). Clark University Press.

Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327

Balakrishnan, V. (2017). Key determinants for intention to use social media for learning in higher education institutions. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16(2), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0457-0

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory (1st ed.). Prentice- Hall.

Bardakcı, S. (2019). Exploring high school students' educational use of YouTube. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/ 10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.4074

Bashir, I., & Madhavaiah, C. (2015). Consumer attitude and behavioral intention towards internet banking adoption in India. Journal of Indian Business Research, 7(1), 67-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/jibr-02-2014-0013

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Sage Publications.

Chauhan, S. (2015). Acceptance of mobile money by poor citizens of India: Integrating trust into the technology acceptance model. Info, 17(3), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1108/info-02-2015-0018

Chen, S.-C., & Hung, C.-W. (2016). Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: An extension of theory of planned behavior. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore. 2016.08.022

Chen, T., Peng, L., Jing, B., Wu, C., Yang, J., & Cong, G. (2020). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on User Experience with Online Education Platforms in China. Sustainability, 12(18), 7329. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12187329

Chinese Primary and secondary Education informatization Industry. (2019). Information invests in Primary and secondary education in China in 2019. http://report.iresearch.cn.2019.

Clark, V. L. P., & Ivankova, N. V. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field (1st ed.). Sage Publications.

Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2014). Business research methods (12th ed.). McGraw Hill.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2016). Statistics systems achievement size. In series in data technology manipulate (1st ed.). Now Publishers.

Efiloğlu, K. Ö., & Tingöy, Ö. (2017). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in higher education: An empirical study in Turkey, and the UK. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(26), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s41239-017-0064-z

Fan, X., Duangekanong, S., & Xu, M. (2021). Factors Affecting College Students’ Intention to Use English U-learning in Sichuan, China. AU-GSB E-JOURNAL, 14(2), 118-129. https://doi.org/10.14456/augsbejr.2021.20

Filippini, R., Forza, C., & Vinelli, A. (1998). Trade-off and compatibility between performance: Definitions and empirical evidence. International Journal of Production Research, 36(12), 3379-3406. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075498192111

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research (1st ed.). Addison-Wesley.

Greenspoon, P. J., & Saklofske, D. H. (1998). Confirmatory factor analysis of the multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(5), 965-971. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00115-9

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed). Pearson.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariant data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results, and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning: International Journal of Strategic Management, 46(1-2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001

Huang, G., & Yuan, X. (2020). New edition tutorial of education statistics and measurement evaluation (1st ed.). East China Normal University Press.

Igbaria, M. (1995). An examination of the factors contributing Magid Igbaria. Accounting, Management & Information Technology, 4(4), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-8022(94)90023-x

Iresearch. (2019). Chinese education industry research report 2020, Shanghai, China. http://report.iresearch.cn/report/202101/3724.shtml.

Kim, H.-W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based totally absolutely adoption of cell net: Empirical research. Choice support structures, 43(1), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Dss.2005.05.009

Maruping, L. M., Bala, H., Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2017). Going beyond intention: Integrating behavioral expectation into the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 623-637. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23699

McCauley, R., & Kilgour, D. (1990). Effect of Air Temperature on Growth of Largemouth Bass in North America. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 119, 276-281. https://doi.org/10.1577/15488659(1990)119<0276:EOATOG>2.3.CO;2

Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Information and Management, 38(4), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206 (00)00061-6

Mtebe, J. S., & Raisamo, R. (2014). Challenges and instructors’ intention to adopt and use open educational resources in higher education in Tanzania. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 251-271.

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1687

Nawi, N. B. C., Nasir, N. A. B. M., & Al Mamun, A. (2016). Factors contributing to the acceptance of social media as a platform among student entrepreneurs: A review. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 42-51.

Neo, M., Park, H., Lee, M., Soh, J., & Oh, J. (2015). Technology acceptance of healthcare e-learning modules: A study of Korean and Malaysian students’ perceptions. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 181-194.

Nuttavuthisit, K., & Thøgersen, J. (2017). The importance of consumer trust for the emergence of a market for green products: The case of organic food. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 323-337.

Pelling, E. L., & White, K. M. (2009). The theory of planned behavior applied to young people’s use of social networking web sites. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 755-759. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0109

Petter, S., & McLean, E. R. (2009). A metanalytic evaluation of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An exam of IS achievement at the individual degree. Records & manage, 46(3), 159-166. Https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Im.2008.12.006

Roest, H., & Pieters, R. (1997). The nomological net of perceived service quality. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8(4), 336-351.

Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovation (1st ed.). Free Press.

Rui-Hsin, K., & Lin, C.-T. (2018). The usage intention of e-learning for police education and training. Policing, 41(1), 98-112.

Selim, H. M. (2003). An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course web sites. Computers & Education, 40(4), 343-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1315(02)00142-2

Shiue, M., & Hsu, Y. (2017). Digital game’s impacts on students’ learning effectiveness of correct medication. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences Special Issue-International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics, 6(1), 157-165.

Shroff, R. H., Deneen, C. C., & Ng, E. M. W. (2011). Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Examining Students’ Behavioural Intention to Use an e-portfolio System. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 600-618. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.940

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology; How to choose a sampling technique for research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(2), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035

Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144

Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432-2440.

Tung, Y. T., Chua, M. T., Wang, S. Y., & Chang, S. Y. (2008). Anti-inflammatory activities of essential oil and its constituents from indigenous cinnamon (Cinnamomum osmophloeum) twigs. Bioresource Technol, 99(1), 3908-3913.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.050

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Vululleh, P. (2018). Determinants of students’ e-learning acceptance in developing countries: An approach based on structural equation modeling (SEM). International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 14(1), 141-151.

Walker, L. S. (2015). Social influence. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology (1st ed.). John Wiley and Sons.

Wang, C., Jeng, Y., & Huang, Y. (2016). What influences teachers to continue using cloud services? The role of facilitating conditions and social influence. The Electronic Library, 35(3), 520-533. https://doi.org/10.1108/el-02-2016-0046

Wu, J. H., & Wang, Y. M. (2006). Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean’s model. Information and Management, 43(6), 728-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.002

Xie, Y. (2012). Sociological methodology and quantitative research (2nd ed.). Social Science Academic Press.

Zait, A., & Bertea, P. E. (2014). Methods for testing discriminant validity. Management & Marketing, 9(2), 217-224.

Zoonen, W., Verhoeven, J. W. M., & Elving, W. J. L. (2014). Understanding work-related social media use: An extension of theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 3(4), 164-183.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-18

How to Cite

Zhan, X. (2024). Examining Students’ Behavioral Intention and Actual Usage Of Mixed Painting Education: A Case of an Art School in Chengdu, China. Scholar: Human Sciences, 16(3), 206-215. https://doi.org/10.14456/shserj.2024.73