The Assessment on Perceived Usefulness and Satisfaction with Online Learning of Postgradute Students in Chengdu, China

Authors

  • Haojing Du

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/shserj.2024.41
CITATION
DOI: 10.14456/shserj.2024.41
Published: 2024-08-20

Keywords:

Service Quality, Perceived Usefulness, Confirmation, Satisfaction, Online Learning

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to assess the determinants of perceived usefulness and satisfaction among postgraduate students regarding their online learning experiences in China. The research framework for this study encompasses seven latent variables: perceived ease of use, system quality, information quality, service quality, perceived usefulness, confirmation, and satisfaction. Research design, data, and methodology: A quantitative research approach was employed in this study, involving the distribution of questionnaires to a sample of 500 postgraduate students drawn from three universities situated in Chengdu, Sichuan, China. Before the data collection, Item-Objective Congruence (IOC): This assessment was employed to establish the content validity of the questionnaire. A pilot test (n=40) was conducted to assess the reliability of the questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was applied to assess the validity of the measurement model. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to analyze relationships among the variables. Results: Perceived ease of use and system quality significantly influence perceived usefulness. The relationship among confirmation, perceived usefulness and satisfaction is supported. Additionally, perceived usefulness significantly influences satisfaction. Nevertheless, information quality and service quality have no significant influence on perceived usefulness. Conclusions: By focusing on user-friendliness, system quality, and managing student expectations, institutions can improve perceived usefulness and overall satisfaction.

Author Biography

Haojing Du

School of Literature and News Communication, Xihua University, China.

References

Aboelmaged, M. G. (2018). Predicting the success of Twitter in healthcare. Online Information Review, 42(6), 898-922.

Al-Mamary, Y. H., & Shamsuddin, A. (2015). Adoption of Management Information Systems in Context of Yemeni Organizations: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Journal of Digital Information Management, 13(6), 429-444.

Awang, Z. (2012). A Handbook on SEM Structural Equation Modelling: SEM Using AMOS Graphic (5th ed.). Universiti Teknologi Mara Kelantan.

Bashir, I., & Madhavaiah, C. (2014). Determinants of Young Consumers' Intention to Use Internet Banking Services in India. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 18(3), 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262914538369

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance. Decision Support Systems, 32(2), 201-214.

Camarero, C., Rodríguez, J., & San José, R. (2012). An exploratory study of online forums as a collaborative learning tool. Online Information Review, 36(4), 568-586.

Cheng, Y.-M. (2014). Extending the expectation-confirmation model with quality and flow to explore nurses continued blended e-learning intention. Information Technology & People, 27(3), 230-258.

Cheng, Y.-M. (2019). How does task-technology fit influence cloud-based e-learning continuance and impact?. Education + Training, 61(4), 480-499.

Cheng, Y.-M. (2021). Can tasks and learning be balanced? A dual-pathway model of cloud-based e-learning continuance intention and performance outcomes. Kybernetes, 51(1), 210-240.

China Research Institute of Commerce and Industry. (2022, August 25). Summary of the latest policies of China's online education industry in 2022 (Table).

https://www.askci.com/news/chanye/20220825/1752311968112.shtml

Cho, V., Cheng, T. C. E., & Lai, W. M. J. (2009). The role of perceived user-interface design in continued usage intention of self-paced e-learning tools. Computers & Education, 53(2), 216-227.

Choi, D. H., Kim, J., & Kim, S. H. (2007). ERP training with a web-based electronic learning system: The flow theory perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(3), 223-243.

Chowdhury, T. I., Hoque, M. R., Wanke, P., Raihan, M. Z., & Azad, M. A. K. (2022). Antecedents of perceived service quality of online education during a pandemic: Configuration analysis based on fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Evaluation Review, 46(3), 235-265.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.

Elmorshidy, A. (2018). The impact of knowledge management systems on innovation. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 48(3), 388-403.

Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., Al Kawas, S., & Abdalla, M. E. (2021). Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: Perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges. Medical Education Online, 26(1), 192-199.

Fan, X., Duangekanong, S., & Xu, M. (2021). Factors Affecting College Students’ Intention to Use English U-learning in Sichuan, China. AU-GSB E-JOURNAL, 14(2), 118-129. https://doi.org/10.14456/augsbejr.2021.20

Foresight Industry Research Institute. (2018, January 25). Analysis of the status quo of the online education industry in China. https://bg.qianzhan.com/trends/detail/506/180125-7d48689d.html

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Garcia, S. L., & Silva, C. M. (2017). Differences between perceived usefulness of social media and institutional channels by undergraduate students. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(3), 196-215.

Garrison, D. R. (2003). Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: The role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Practice and direction (pp. 47-58). Sloan-C.

Hair, J. F., Money, A. H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. (2007). Researcher Methods for Business. Education + Training, 49(4), 336-337.

Hempel, C. G. (1945). Studies in the logic of confirmation. Mind, 54, 1-26.

Ifinedo, P. (2017). Students’ perceived impact of learning and satisfaction with blogs. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34(4), 322-337.

Islam, A. Y. M. A., Mok, M. M. C., Xiuxiu, Q., & Leng, C. H. (2018). Factors influencing students’ satisfaction in using wireless internet in higher education. The Electronic Library, 36(1), 2-20.

Lee, B. C., Yoon, J. O., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1320-1329.

Lee, J. W. (2010). Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 277-283.

Lin, F., Fofanah, S. S., & Liang, D. (2011). Assessing citizen adoption of e-government initiatives in Gambia: A validation of the technology acceptance model in information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 271-279.

Marakarkandy, B., Yajnik, N., & Dasgupta, C. (2016). Enabling internet banking adoption an empirical examination with an augmented technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(2), 263-294.

Ngai, E. W., Poon, J. K. L., & Chan, Y. H. (2007). Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers and Education, 48(2), 250-267.

Ortaçtepe, D. (2016). Using webcasts for student presentations: A case study. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 33(1), 57-74.

Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1285-1296.

Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome - A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1-14.

Pedroso, R., Zanetello, L., Guimaraes, L., Pettenon, M., Goncalves, V., Scherer, J., Kessler, F., & Pechansky, F. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the crack use relapse scale (CURS). Archives of Clinical Psychiatry, 43(3), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-60830000000081

Radner, R., & Rothschild, M. (1975). On the allocation of effort. Journal of Economic Theory, 10(3), 358-376.

Rui, H. K., & Lin, C.-T. (2018). The usage intention of e-learning for police education and training. Policing: An International Journal, 41(1), 98-112.

Salimon, M. G., Mokhtar, S. S. M., Aliyu, O. A., Yusr, M. M., & Perumal, S. (2021). Solving e-learning adoption intention puzzles among private universities in Nigeria: An empirical approach. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(3), 613-631.

Shah, H. J., & Attiq, S. (2016). Impact of technology quality, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness in the formation of consumer’s satisfaction in the context of e-learning. Abasyn Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 124-139.

Sharma, S., Pradhan, K., Satya, S., & Vasudevan, P. (2005). Potentiality of earthworms for waste management and in other uses- a review. Journal of American Science, 1(1), 4-16.

Sica, C., & Ghisi, M. (2007). The Italian versions of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory-II: Psychometric properties and discriminant power. In M. A. Lange (Ed.), Leading-edge psychological tests and testing research (pp. 27-50). Nova Science Publishers.

Soper, D. (2023). Calculator: A-priori Sample Size for Structural Equation Models. Daniel Soper.

https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calculator.aspx?id=89

Tan, X., & Kim, Y. (2015). User acceptance of SaaS-based collaboration tools: A case of Google Docs. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 423-442.

Tung, F.-C., & Chang, S.-C. (2008). Nursing students’ behavioral intention to use online courses: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(9), 1299-1309.

Wang, J., & Xiao, J. J. (2009). Buying behavior, social support and credit card indebtedness of college students. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(1), 2-10.

Wu, J. H., & Wang, Y. M. (2006). Measuring KMS Success: A Respecification of the DeLone and McLean’s Model. Journal of Information & Management, 43(6), 728-739.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.002

Yang, H., & Chung-Ho, S. (2017). Learner behaviour in a MOOC practice-oriented course: in empirical study integrating TAM and TPB. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Athabasca, 18(5), 35-63.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-20

How to Cite

Du, H. (2024). The Assessment on Perceived Usefulness and Satisfaction with Online Learning of Postgradute Students in Chengdu, China. Scholar: Human Sciences, 16(2), 152-161. https://doi.org/10.14456/shserj.2024.41