The Role of Task Technology Fit to Enhance Student Satisfaction Towards Blended Learning in Chengdu, China

Authors

  • Wenbo Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/shserj.2024.33
CITATION
DOI: 10.14456/shserj.2024.33
Published: 2024-08-20

Keywords:

Blended Learning, Task Technology Fit, Satisfaction, Private Colleges, China

Abstract

Purpose: Blended learning had become a popular educational approach that mixed the characteristics of face-to-face lectures and online learning in the digital age. This research aimed to examine the factors of task technology fit, confirmation, cognitive presence, teaching presence, social presence, and learner-instructors interaction to impact blended learning satisfaction of college students in Chengdu, China. The research model demonstrates relationships between key varaibles. Research design and methodology: This research applied the quantitative method and questionnaire as instruments to survey 500 students, who majored in art and design subjects. Before distributing the questionnaires, Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) and a pilot test of Cronbach’s Alpha were used to test validity and reliability. Data was analyzed by utilizing Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to validate the model’s goodness of fit and confirm the causal relationship among variables for hypothesis testing.. Results: The main findings revealed that confirmation, cognitive presence, social presence, and learner-instructors interaction significantly influenced satisfaction with blended learning, except task technology fit and teaching presence. Cognitive presence and learner-instructor interaction has strong and significant role to enhance students’ satisfaction with hybrid learning. Conclusions: The study has found that the research conceptual model could predict and explain how the factors impact blended learning satisfaction.

Author Biography

Wenbo Li

School of Art and Design, Tianfu College of Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, China.

References

Al-hawari, M. A., & Mouakket, S. (2010). The influence of technology acceptance model (TAM) factors on students’ e-satisfaction and e-retention within the context of UAE e-learning. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 3(4), 299-314.

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States.

http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/pdf/learningondemand.pdf

Al-Mamary, Y. H., & Shamsuddin, A. (2015). Testing of the technology acceptance model in context of Yemen. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 268-273. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s1p268

Alsadoon, E. (2018). The impact of social presence on learners’ satisfaction in mobile learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(1), 226-233.

Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 117. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875

Andronie, M. (2014). Distance learning management based on information technology. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 6(1), 350-361.

Arbaugh, J. B., & Duray, R. (2001). Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based courses an exploratory study of two on-line MBA programs. Manage. Learn. 33(3), 331-347.

https://doi.org/10.5465/apbpp.2001.6133570

Awang, Z. (2012). Structural equation modeling using AMOS graphic (5th ed.). Penerbit Universiti Teknologi MARA.

Battalio, J. (2007). Interaction online: A reevaluation. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(4), 339-352.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance. Decis Support Syst, 32(2), 201-214.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-9236(01)00111-7

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001a). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921

Bollen, K. A. (1989). A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124189017003004

Bolliger, D. U., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal of E-Learning, 3(1), 61-67.

Bordoloi, R., Das, P., & Das, K. (2021). Perception towards online/blended learning at the time of Covid-19 pandemic: an academic analysis in the Indian context. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 16(1), 41-60.

https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-09-2020-0079

Chang, V., & Fisher, D. L. (2003). The validation and application of a new learning environment instrument for online learning in higher education. Technology-Rich Learning Environments, 1, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812564412_0001

Cheng, Y. M. (2013). Exploring the roles of interaction and flow in explaining nurses' e-learning acceptance. Nurse Education Today, 33(1), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.02.005

Cheng, Y. M. (2014). Extending the expectation-confirmation model with quality and flow to explore nurses continued blended e-learning intention, Information Technology and People, 27(3), 230-258.

https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-01-2013-0024

Cheng, Y. M. (2019). How does task-technology fit influence cloud-based e-learning continuance and impact?. Education + Training, 61(4), 480-499. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-09-2018-0203

Cheung, W., Lam, V., Sarmiento, J. L., & Kearney, K. (2010). Large-scale Redistribution of Maximum Fisheries Catch Potential in the Global Ocean under Climate Change. Global Change Biology, 16(1), 24-35.

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. (2011). Business Research Methods (11th ed.). McGraw Hill/Irwin.

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Journal of Management Information Systems, 3(1), 60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60

Dempsey, P. R., & Zhang, J. (2019). Re-Examining the Construct Validity and Causal Relationships of Teaching, Cognitive, and Social Presence in Community of Inquiry Framework. Online Learning Journal, 23(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1419

Dikko, M. (2016). Establishing Construct Validity and Reliability: Pilot Testing of a Qualitative Interview for Research in Takaful (Islamic Insurance). Qualitative Report, 21(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2243

Doll, W., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-461. https://doi.org/10.2307/249524

Evans, C., & Gibbons, N. J. (2007). The interactivity effect in multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1147-1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.008

Fornell, C. G., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150979

Foroughi, B., Iranmanesh, M., & Hyun, S. S. (2019). Understanding the determinants of mobile banking continuance usage intention. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(6), 1015-1033. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-10-2018- 0237

Friesen, N. (2012). Report: defining blended learning. https://www.normfriesen.info/papers/Defining_Blended_Learning_NF.pdf

Garcia, J., Euclides, V. P. B., Alcalde, C. R., Difante, G. S., & Medeiros, S. R. (2014). Intake, grazing time, and performance of steers supplemented in Brachiaria decumbens pastures during the dry season. Semina: Ciencias Agrarias, 35(4), 2094-2104.

Garrison, D. R. (2003). Self-Directed Learning and Distance Education. In M. G. Moore, & W. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 161-168). Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum.

Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Garrison, D. R. M., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002

Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2013). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 84-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.005

Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(1), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text–based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 1-14. http://doi:10.1016/S1096-7516 (00)00016-6

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071

Gasevic, D., Tsai, Y., Dawson, S., & Pardo, A. (2019). How do we start? An approach to learning analytics adoption in higher education. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36(4), 342-353.

https://doi.org/10.1108/ijilt-02-2019-0024

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519

Goodhue, D. L. (1995). Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems. Management Science, 41(12), 1827-1844. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.12.1827

Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213-236. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689

Gu, L., & Wang, J. (2015). A Task Technology Fit Model on E-learning. Issues in Information Systems, 16(1), 163-69. https://doi.org/10.48009/1_iis_2015_163-169

Gurley, L. E. (2018). Educators’ preparation to teach, perceived teaching presence, and perceived teaching presence behaviors in blended and online learning environments. Online Learning Journal, 22(2), 197-220.

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i2.1255

Hadad, W. (2007). ICT-in-education toolkit reference handbook. Info Dev. http://www.infodev.org/en/Publication.301.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed). Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hair, J. F., Celsi, M., Ortinau, D. J., & Bush, R. P. (2010). Essentials of marketing research (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Hair, J. F., Money, A. H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. (2007). Research Methods for Business. Journal of Education Training, 49(4), 336-337. https://doi.org/10.1108/et.2007.49.4.336.2

Handover, M. D. (2015). American College Health Association. American College Health Association-National College (1st ed.). Spring.

Hilliard, L. P., & Stewart, M. K. (2019). Time well spent: Creating a community of inquiry in blended first-year writing courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 41, 11-24.

Huang, Y. M. (2016). The factors that predispose students to continuously use cloud services: Social and technological perspectives. Computers & Education, 97, 86-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.016

Janson, A., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2017). Individual Appropriation of Learning Management Systems-Antecedents and Consequences. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(3), 173-201.

https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00094

Joseph, A., & Gliem, R. R. G. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult (1st ed.). Continuing, and Community Education

Juwah, C. (2006). Interactions in Online Education (1st ed.). Routledge.

Kang, M., & Im, T. (2013). Factors of learner–instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environment. Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 292-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12005

Khan, I. U., Hameed, Z., Yu, Y., Islam, T., & Sheikh, Z. (2017). Predicting the acceptance of MOOCs in a developing country: Application of Task-Technology Fit Model, Social Motivation, and Self-determination Theory. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 964-978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.009

Kozan, K., & Richardson, J. C. (2014). Interrelationships between and among social, teaching, and cognitive presence. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 68-73.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.007

Larsen, T. J., & Sreb, A. M. (2009). The Role of Task-technology Fit as Users’ Motivation to Continue Information System Use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 778-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.02.006

Law, K. M. Y., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers & Education, 136, 1-12.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.021

Lee, J. W. (2010). Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 277-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.08.002

Leong, C. M., Goh, C. F., Ismail, F., Tan, O. K., & Ong, C. H. (2021). E-learning satisfaction: Investigating Gender Differences. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, 12(1), 1-28.

Lin, T.-C., & Huang, C.-C. (2008). Understanding knowledge management system usage antecedents: An integration of social cognitive theory and task technology fit. Information & Management, 45(6), 410-417.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.06.004

Lin, W. S., & Wang, C. H. (2012). Antecedence to Continued Intentions of Adopting E-learning System in Blended Learning Instruction: A Contingency Framework Based on Models of Information System Success and Task-technology Fit. Computers & Education, 58(1), 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.008

Liu, W. (2021). Caveats for the use of Web of Science Core Collection in old literature retrieval and historical bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121023

Lowenthal, P. R. (2010). The Evolution and Influence of Social Presence Theory on Online Learning. In T. T. Kidd (Ed.), online education and adult learning: New frontiers for teaching practices (1st ed.). IGI Global.

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure models. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.130

McGill, J., & Klobas, J. E. (2009). A task-technology fit view of learning management system impact. Computers & Education, 52, 496508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.002

Min, Y., Huang, J., Varghese, M. M., & Jaruwanakul, T. (2022). Analysis of Factors Affecting Art Major Students’ Behavioral Intention of Online Education in Public Universities in Chengdu. AU-GSB E-JOURNAL, 15(2), 150-158.

https://doi.org/10.14456/augsbejr.2022.80

Mirabolghasemi, M., Choshaly, S. H., & Iahad, N. A. (2019). Using the HOT-fit model to predict the determinants of E-learning readiness in higher education: a developing country’s perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 24(6), 3555-3576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09945-9

Mirabolghasemi, M., Reyhaneh, S., & Choshaly, H. (2021). An investigation into the determinants of blended leaning satisfaction from EFL learners’ perspective Interactive. Technology and Smart Education, 18(1), 69-84.

https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-07-2020-0117

Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7.

https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659

Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systematic view of online learning (1st ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Ngan, L. (2011). Effective student project management with peer interaction. In V. Lee, F. L. Wang, S. Cheung & A. Hung (Eds.), Blended learning: Maximization of teaching and learning effectiveness (pp, 178-180). City University of Hong Kong.

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150499

Paechter, M., & Maier, B. (2010). Online or face-to-face? Students' experiences and preferences in e-learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 292-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.004

Pedroso, R., Zanetello, L., Guimaraes, L., Pettenon, M., Goncalves, V., Scherer, J., Kessler, F., & Pechansky, F. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the crack use relapse scale (CURS). Archives of Clinical Psychiatry, 43(3), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-60830000000081

Rabaai, A. (2021). Students’ Continuance Intention to Use MOODLE: an Expectation- Confirmation Model Approach. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 16, 397-434.

Rahi, S., Abd Ghani, M., Alnaser, F. M., & Ngah, A. H. (2018). Investigating the role of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in internet banking adoption context. Management Science Letters, 8, 173-186.

https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.1.001

Rettie, R. (2006). Connectedness, awareness, and social presence. 6th International Presence Workshop.

http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/2106/1/Rettie.pdf.

Rubin, B., Fernandes, R., & Avgerinou, M. D. (2013). The effects of technology on the community of inquiry and satisfaction with online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 48-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.006

Schwartz, L., & Gutierrez, K. (2015). Literacy Studies and Situated Methods: Exploring the social organization of household activity and family media use (1st ed.). Routledge.

Sharma, G. P., Verma, R. C., & Pathare, P. (2005). Mathematical modeling of infrared radiation thin layer drying of onion slices. Journal of Food Engineering, 71(3), 282-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.02.010

Shea, P., Pickett, J. A. M., & Pelz, W. E. (2003). A follow-up investigation of teaching presence in the SUNY Learning Network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(2), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v7i2.1856

Short, J., William, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2(14), 1-10.

Sica, C., & Ghisi, M. (2007). The Italian versions of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory-II: Psychometric properties and discriminant power. In M.A. Lange (Ed.), Leading - Edge psychological tests and testing research (pp. 27-50). Nova.

Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P., Kraut, R. E., & Gross, E. (2001). The Impact of Computer Use on Children's and Adolescents' Development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22(1), 7-30.

Szeto, E. (2015). Community of inquiry as an instructional approach: what effects of teaching, social and cognitive presences are there in blended synchronous learning and teaching? Computers and Education, 81, 191-201.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.015

Tammelin, M. (1998). From telepresence to social presence: The role of presence in a network-based learning environment. In Tella, S. (Ed.), Aspects of Media Education: Strategic Imperatives in the Information Age (1st ed.). University of Helsinki. Media Education Publications.

Thurmond, V. A. (2003). Examination of interaction variables as predictors of students’ satisfaction and willingness to enroll in future web-based courses while controlling for student characteristics [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Kansas.

Vaughan, N. D. (2004). Technology in support of faculty learning communities. In M. D. Cox, & L. Richlin (Eds.), Building faculty learning communities: new directions for teaching and learning (pp. 101-109). Wiley.

Wei, C., & Liang, T. (2004). Introduction to the Special Issue: Mobile Commerce Applications. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(3), 7-17.

Whiteside, A. L., & Garrett Dikkers, A. (2008). Social presence in online learning. Paper presented at the New Media Research Conference. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 19(2), 1-10.

Wickersham, L. E., & McGee, P. (2008). Perceptions of satisfaction and deeper learning in an online course. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(1), 73-83.

Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028

Wu, J. H., & Wang, Y. M. (2006). Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean’s model. Information and Management, 43(6), 728-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.002

Wuyan, Y. (2022). Constructing a New Form of Higher Education through Digitization. Outlook, 31, 1-10.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-20

How to Cite

Li, W. (2024). The Role of Task Technology Fit to Enhance Student Satisfaction Towards Blended Learning in Chengdu, China. Scholar: Human Sciences, 16(2), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.14456/shserj.2024.33