The Predictive Relationship of Ideal Self, Integrativeness, Direct Contact, and Cultural Interest on English Language Readiness for the Asean Economic Community of Grade 8 Students at Horwang School, Thailand

Authors

  • Jerwin Angeles Jabutay Assumption University Huamark, Thailand
  • Orlando Rafael González González

Keywords:

Ideal Self, Integrativeness, Direct Contact, Cultural Interest, English Language Readiness for the ASEAN Economic Community

Abstract

The purpose of this quantitative study was to examine the English language readiness for the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) of Grade 8 students at Horwang School, Thailand, under the hypothesis that ideal self, integrativeness, direct contact, and cultural interest had positive predictive relationships on English language readiness. A total of 116 Grade 8 students comprised the sample of this study. The TOEFL Junior Tests measured the participants’ English language readiness for the AEC, while the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) English Language Readiness Model Questionnaire was used to collect data on students’ ideal self, integrativeness, direct contact, and cultural interest. Descriptive statistics and correlational analysis (using multiple linear regression) were used to analyze the students’ responses. The results revealed that the participants had strong levels of ideal self, integrativeness, direct contact, and cultural interest in relation to the use of the English language as ASEAN citizens. Furthermore, the participants were found to be very ready in terms of their English language readiness for the AEC. From the initially hypothesized combination of four predictor variables having a positive predictive relationship on participants’ English language readiness for the AEC, the correlational analysis indicated that there was a significant, positive predictive relationship only for the combination of two predictor variables, ideal self and cultural interest, which explained 11% of the variance in respondents’ English language readiness for the AEC. Based on the theoretical and practical implications of the findings, recommendations for action and further study are provided.

References

Arnett, J. J. (2002). The psychology of globalization. American Psychologist, 57(10), 774-783.

Bolton, K. (2008). English in Asia, Asian Englishes, and the issue of proficiency. English Today, 24(2), 3-12.

Chuanchaisit, S., & Prapphal, K. (2009). A study of English communication strategies of Thai university students. MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities, 12(3), 100-126.

Csizér, K., & Kormos, J. (2009). Learning experiences, selves and motivated learning behavior: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 98-119). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31(3), 117-135.

Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (Eds.). (2009). Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (Vol. 36). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Education First. (2019). EF English proficiency index: The world’s largest ranking of countries and regions by English skills. Retrieved from https://www.ef.com/wwen/epi/

Educational Testing Service [ETS]. (2017). TOEFL Junior® Standard Test overall score levels. Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/toefl_junior/scores_research/standard/overall/

Egger, P., & Larch, M. (2008). Interdependent preferential trade agreement memberships: An empirical analysis. Journal of International Economics, 76(2), 384-399.

Gardner, R.C. (2001). Language learning motivation: The student, the teacher, and the researcher. Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education, 6(1), 1-18. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED464495.pdf

Hallinger, P., & Lee, M. (2013). Exploring principal capacity to lead reform of teaching and learning quality in Thailand. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(4), 305-315.

Jiang, W. (2000). The relationship between culture and language. ELT Journal, 54(4), 328-334.

Khamkhien, A. (2010). Teaching English-speaking and English-speaking tests in the Thai context: A reflection from Thai perspective. English Language Teaching, 3(1), 184-190.

Khamkhien, A. (2012). Computer-assisted language learning and English language teaching in Thailand: Overview. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 55-64.

Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. London: Prentice-Hall Europe.

Lamb, M. (2004). “It depends on the students themselves”: Independent language learning at an Indonesian State school, 17(3), 229-245.

Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954-969.

Noom-Ura, S. (2013). English-teaching problems in Thailand and Thai teachers’ professional development needs. English Language Teaching, 6(11), 139-147.

Sedgwick, P. (2014). Cross-sectional studies: Advantages and disadvantages. British Medical Journal, 348, 1-2.

Tremblay, P. F., & Gardner, R. C. (1995). Expanding the motivation construct in language learning. Modern Language Journal, 79, 505-518.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-18

How to Cite

Jabutay, J. A., & González, O. R. G. (2021). The Predictive Relationship of Ideal Self, Integrativeness, Direct Contact, and Cultural Interest on English Language Readiness for the Asean Economic Community of Grade 8 Students at Horwang School, Thailand. Scholar: Human Sciences, 13(2), 302. Retrieved from http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/Scholar/article/view/4849