Prajñā Vihāra: Journal of Philosophy and Religion http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/PrajnaVihara <div><strong>Prajñā Vihāra</strong> is a multicultural and pluralistic journal of ethics, philosophy and religious studies dedicated to the promotion of mutual understanding among the diverse peoples of the world. In the spirit of the Sanskrit words <strong>“Prajñā Vihāra”</strong> meaning “temple of wisdom,” the editors encourage creative academic work that promotes a sharing of wisdom among scholars and readers. It welcomes specialized articles in Ethics, Philosophy, Religion and Cultural Studies that seek to promote harmony between various philosophical and religious traditions while respecting cultural and religious difference. It especially welcomes articles that engage with philosophical and religious issues in the Southeast Asian region.</div> The Graduate School of Philosophy and Religion en-US Prajñā Vihāra: Journal of Philosophy and Religion 1513-6442 <p><strong>Consent to Publish and Transfer of Copyright</strong><br />By publishing in Prajñā Vihāra, the author agrees to transfer and assign to Assumption University of Thailand as the Publisher of the Journal, the copyright to the Article in any form, including any and all rights, interests and claims related to it.</p><p>The author does retain the following rights:</p><ol><li><span style="font-size: 10px;">The right to make further copies of the published article for their </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">use in classroom teaching.</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 10px;">The right to reuse all or part of the published article in a </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">compilation of his or her own works or in textbooks of which </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">they are the author or coauthor.</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 10px;">The right to make copies of the published article for internal </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">distribution within their academic institution.</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 10px;">All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.</span></li></ol><span style="font-size: 10px;">The author must also guarantee that:</span><br /><ol><li><span style="font-size: 10px;">The Article is his or her original work, and has not been published </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">previously and is not under consideration for publication </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">elsewhere.</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 10px;">It does not contain any matter that is obscene, libelous, or contrary </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">to law.</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 10px;">They have obtained the necessary license or written authority </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">and paid any and all related fees for the use and reproduction of </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">text, tables, illustrations and other copyrighted work from the </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">owners of the intellectual property rights, and can furnish the </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">Publisher copies of the license/written authority and proof of </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">payment of related fees upon the signing of this Agreement.</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 10px;">They have the consent of the Co-Authors of the article upon the </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">signing of this Agreement.</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 10px;">In the event that they intend to republish, reprint or translate all </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">or part of the Article in other publications, they will secure the </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">prior written permission from the journal Editor</span><span style="font-size: 10px;">.</span></li></ol><p><strong>Prajñā Vihāra adopts the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) license</strong></p> VISUALIZATIONS OF PHILOSOPHICAL CROSS-CULTURAL INTERACTION AND INFLUENCE IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/PrajnaVihara/article/view/7897 <p>While the process of influence between various cultural and<br>historical traditions in philosophy has been taking place<br>for thousands of years, this inter-cultural interaction is<br>occurring at a more accelerated pace in the information age.<br>While philosophers throughout history have used visual<br>representations to understand philosophical influence and<br>historical origins and the distribution of philosophical ideas<br>and sub-disciplines, this paper stresses the importance of<br>philosophical visualizations to represent the global interactivity<br>of philosophy. It provides various visualizations to<br>represent global philosophical interaction, the penetration of<br>Western philosophical ideas into non-Western philosophical<br>traditions, and the appropriation of non-Western traditions<br>by Western philosophers. Such visualizations are important<br>in the contemporary age to promote regional philosophies,<br>to understand philosophical influence and to understand the<br>promotion of a kind of pluralism which remains engaged<br>with the global world.</p> Ferry Hidayat Copyright (c) 2024 Prajñā Vihāra: Journal of Philosophy and Religion 2024-01-29 2024-01-29 25 1 1 1 10.59865/prajn.2024.1 A THOMSONIAN ARGUMENT AGAINST MEDICAL MANDATES http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/PrajnaVihara/article/view/7898 <p>This paper explores the parallel between Judith Jarvis Thomson's argument for abortion rights based on bodily autonomy and the contentious issue of vaccine refusal. Drawing on Thomson's famous thought experiment involving a violinist, I present analogous scenarios involving medical decisions. I argue that if Thomson's reasoning holds, individuals also possess the right to refuse vaccines, even if it entails serious risk to others. The paper underscores the importance of recognizing that medical decisions, including vaccine refusal, should be evaluated within the framework of bodily autonomy and individual rights, challenging the prevailing opinion on this complex issue.</p> Chitchanok Wanroek Demsar Copyright (c) 2024 Prajñā Vihāra: Journal of Philosophy and Religion 2024-01-29 2024-01-29 25 1 36 36 10.59865/prajn.2024.2 MERCY (RAHMAH) AS THE PRELUDE TO ISLAM http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/PrajnaVihara/article/view/7899 <p>Mercy is central to the very identity of Islam, yet this is not often recognized by theologians and scholars. This paper will demonstrate that the idea of mercy is important as a prelude to the understanding of Islam and an interpretation of its teachings. This important role of mercy is evident in Islam's primary sources – the Quran and the Sunnah – and is not contingent on political, social, or historical contexts. It is well recognized that the proper comprehension of Islam hinges on grasping the attributes of God, his divine message, and the character of his messenger. But what is often overlooked is that these aspects are fundamentally rooted in mercy. Islam encourages its followers to cultivate merciful virtues. It emphasizes that the compassionate nature of the faith should always precede the understanding and interpretation of its teachings. As a result, Muslims are encouraged to nurture a compassionate self, foster a benevolent mindset and approach, and anchor their religious obedience in the spirit of mercy. While followers of Islam are responsible for upholding this ethos, external observers too should try to view the religion fairly based upon this recognition of the centrality of mercy.</p> Mohammad Manzoor Malik Copyright (c) 2024 Prajñā Vihāra: Journal of Philosophy and Religion 2024-01-29 2024-01-29 25 1 45 45 10.59865/prajn.2024.3 DYING WITH DIGNITY AND THE ARGUMENT FROM CONSCIENCE http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/PrajnaVihara/article/view/7900 <p>This paper examines some of the arguments in favor of and against <strong>“</strong>mercy killing<strong>”. </strong>Euthanasia is defined as the voluntary or involuntary killing of a terminally ill human being suffering from unbearable pain and intolerable suffering<strong>. </strong>Literally, euthanasia means <strong>“</strong>good death<strong>” </strong>or <strong>“</strong>dying with dignity<strong>.” </strong>But the argument for mercy killing hides under the ill motive of emancipating oneself the burden of having to bear a life that appears meaningless<strong>. </strong>This inquiry argues that such a position is morally unacceptable since it violates life itself<strong>. </strong>But the reason this paper puts forward is not based on the stewardship argument, one that says life is sacred<strong>. </strong>The stewardship argument is weak compared to the <strong>“</strong>right to die<strong>” </strong>advanced by liberal philosophers<strong>. </strong>As an alternative, the<strong> “</strong>argument from conscience<strong>”</strong>, which puts emphasis on recognizing the moral mistake of reducing the value of human life into something that is instrumentalist, is proposed<strong>. </strong>James Rachels<strong>’</strong>s utilitarian argument for mercy killing seeks to diminish the suffering in the world<strong>. </strong>But what it hides is that it actually mistreats human life as something that is quantifiable<strong>. </strong>The argument from conscience is a humanist position that is grounded in the love and attention for the dying<strong>.</strong></p> Christopher Ryan Baquero Maboloc Copyright (c) 2024 Prajñā Vihāra: Journal of Philosophy and Religion 2024-01-29 2024-01-29 25 1 62 62 10.59865/prajn.2024.4 JESUS’ PRINCIPLES FOR PEACEBUILDING http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/PrajnaVihara/article/view/7901 <p>This study explores Jesus’ ideas about peacebuilding in their historical context. The study considers Jesus’ teaching within the context of the conflict of first-century Palestine at its center. Jesus conceptualizes peace in the context of the kingdom of God and prioritizes peace over justice. The principles for Jesus’ strategy for peacebuilding are motivated by compassion, love, identity, forgiveness, and peace itself as a superior reality. The practical implications of these include reset of conflict realities, recognition of ambivalence of conflict and peace, building a culture of peace in the presence of conflict, reconciliation, repentance, and forgiveness, and human free will. The study identifies four conflict barriers that contribute to present-day conflict perpetuation: a destructive emotional orientation, a compromised vision for peace, compromised pragmatic ethics, and an ethnocentric view of peace.</p> Robert Ottenhof Copyright (c) 2024 Prajñā Vihāra: Journal of Philosophy and Religion 2024-01-29 2024-01-29 25 1 78 78 10.59865/prajn.2024.5 THE GROWTH OF CHRISTIANITY IN SHANGHAI CONSIDERED THROUGH THE RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY OF RELIGION http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/PrajnaVihara/article/view/7902 <p>The increasing growth of Christianity in Shanghai, China, provides an instructive model for understanding the marketing and economics of religion. The paper employs theoretical analysis as well as an analysis of the results of field study. The theoretical study employed rational choice theory and the field study included visiting religious places and conducting interviews. The major field work took place at Christian churches and other places of worship in Shanghai city during Christmas and New Year time, 2019. This research concludes that Christianity and its competitiveness in comparison to the other faiths in Shanghai, will gain popularity in Shanghai follower will grow in numbers</p> Yuanjing Xue Mohammad Manzoor Malik Copyright (c) 2024 Prajñā Vihāra: Journal of Philosophy and Religion 2024-01-29 2024-01-29 25 1 103 103 10.59865/prajn.2024.6