Re-visiting the Ethics of War in the Philosophy of St. Augustine, Mahatma Gandhi and the Dalai Lama

Authors

  • Ananya Barua

Abstract

In the Western imagination, both Gandhi and the Dalai Lama are the icons of non-violence, one a Hindu, the other a Buddhist, and both are pioneers of renewing the bond of one spiritual family of mankind that alone could spread the noble message of, ‘vasudha iva kutumbaka’ ‘all men our kinsmen’. They are the representatives of some of the best spiritual traditions of Asia. While one followed the footsteps of the Buddha, the other imbibed all noble truths from noble traditions of the world, showing equal reverence for the love of God in Ram-Rahim or Jesus, drawing inspiration from the Bhagavad Gita to the Sermon on the Mount, from the works of Henry David Thoreau to John Ruskin. Yet one also witnesses events that contradict these idealistic movements. Katherine Young points out that “because of Gandhi, people assumed that Indian was a pacifist society.” Yet she writes that the stereotype of Hindu non-violence “was shattered in May 1998 when India tested five nuclear bombs (Young, 2004).”1 This leads one to ponder the efficacy of these doctrines of non-violence and its implications in the pragmatic affairs of the world. How can one address the urgent issues of our time; such as war, violence, terrorism and threats of insecurity to life and property? I will cite instances from Gandhi’s ethics and then an attempt will be made to provide a distinctively Buddhist perspective. Finally, these two Asian perspectives are to be understood in terms of the contemporary moral perspectives that debate over issues of ‘just war’, a tradition that was originated in the philosophy of St. Augustine.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-11

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 2 (2016): July - December 2016

Section

Articles

License

Consent to Publish and Transfer of Copyright
By publishing in Prajñā Vihāra, the author agrees to transfer and assign to Assumption University of Thailand as the Publisher of the Journal, the copyright to the Article in any form, including any and all rights, interests and claims related to it.

The author does retain the following rights:

  1. The right to make further copies of the published article for their use in classroom teaching.
  2. The right to reuse all or part of the published article in a compilation of his or her own works or in textbooks of which they are the author or coauthor.
  3. The right to make copies of the published article for internal distribution within their academic institution.
  4. All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
The author must also guarantee that:
  1. The Article is his or her original work, and has not been published previously and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
  2. It does not contain any matter that is obscene, libelous, or contrary to law.
  3. They have obtained the necessary license or written authority and paid any and all related fees for the use and reproduction of text, tables, illustrations and other copyrighted work from the owners of the intellectual property rights, and can furnish the Publisher copies of the license/written authority and proof of payment of related fees upon the signing of this Agreement.
  4. They have the consent of the Co-Authors of the article upon the signing of this Agreement.
  5. In the event that they intend to republish, reprint or translate all or part of the Article in other publications, they will secure the prior written permission from the journal Editor.

Prajñā Vihāra adopts the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) license