Sāṅkhya Teachings Found in Theravada Buddhism: an inquiry into an analogy depicted in the Visuddhimagga
Keywords:
the Visuddhimagga, Sāṅkhya Kārikā, blind and lameAbstract
In the study of philosophies in religions, occasionally, parallel concepts among the religions are also found. For that reason, to understand the original form and precise doctrine of the religions, it is essential to study their history too. The analogy “blind and lame” found in the Visuddhimagga was applied by Buddhaghosa to explain the teaching of Dependent Origination. The same analogy was utilized by Iśvara Kṛṣna to explain the interrelationship between Prakṛti and Puruṣa in Sāṅkhya Kārikā. In consequence, a doubt arises whether the Theravada Buddhist texts were shaded by non-Buddhist systems accepted soul theory. Also, this doubt leads to misunderstand that the teachings of the Dependent and Origination and Prakṛti and Puruṣa are identical. Nevertheless, inquiring the historical records related to these two different religious texts and their traditions, it is obvious that they were different teachings in different contexts. So, this article aims to corroborate varies of them with reference to the history of religions: Buddhism and Sāṅkhya.
References
Bibliography
Buddhadatta, A. P. (1980).Vibhaṅgappakaraṇa aṭṭhakathā. ed. London: Pali Text Society.
Carr, B. & Mahalingam, I. (1997). Asian philosophy. ed. London: Routledge.
Charpentier, J. (1922).Uttaradhyayana. ed. Uppsala.
Chatthasangayana, (1995). Mahāvaṃsa. ed. Vipassana Research Institute.
Dasgupta, S. (1922). A History of Indian Philosophy. Cambridge: University Press.
De Silva, L. (1970). Dighanikayaṭṭhakathā ṭīkā Līnatthavaṇṇanā. ed. III vols.., London: Pali
Text Society.
Ehara, N. R. M., SomaThera & KhemindaThera. (1961). The Path of Freedom
(Vimuttimagga). Colombo: D. Roland D Weerasuriya.
Evans-Wents, W.Y. (1954). The Tibetan Book of the Great Liberation. USA: Oxford
University Press.
Gray, J. (1892). Buddhaghosuppatti. trans. London: Luzac.
Hardy, E. (1902). Nettipakaraṇa. ed. London: Pali Text Society.
Bapat, P.V. (1937). Vimuttimagga and Visuddhimagga. Culcata: Sarkhel.
Jayatilake, K. N. (1963). Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge. London: Goerge Allen and
Limitted.
Jhonston, E. H. (1928). The Saundarananda of Aśvaghoṣa. London: Oxford University Press.
Joshi, C.V. (1979). Paṭisambhidāmagga-aṭṭhakathā. ed. London: Pali Text Society.
Kalupahana, D. J. (1999). Madyamaka Karikā of Nagarjuna. ed. and trans., Delhi: Motilal
Banarasidas.
Mallasekara, G. P. (1958). The Pali Literature of Ceylon. Colombo: M. D. Gunasena.
Muller Max, F. (1899).The Six Systems of Indian Philosophy. London: Longmans.
Nagai, M. (1919). The Vimutti-magga, Pali Text Society Journal, 69-80.
Norman, K. R. (1983). Pali Literature. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Pannarathane, M. & Dhammika, P. (2009). Pali Adhyayana Vimarshana,
Colombo:Wijesuriya.
Rhys Davids, C. A. F. (1975). Visuddhimagga, ed. London: Pali Text Society.
Rhys Davids, T. W. & Carpenter, J. E. (1966). Dīgha-nikāya. eds. vols. I-III, London: Pali
Text Society.
Rhys Davids, T. W. & Carpenter, J. E. (1968). Dīghanikāya aṭṭhakathā (Sumaṅgalavilāsinī). ed.vols. I-III. London: Pali Text Society.
Smith, H. (1966). Sutta-nipata-atthakatha. ed., London:Pali Text Society.
Swami Dasji, S. P. (2010). Indian Philosophy. Bhuj: Sri Swaminarayan Mandir.
Swami Virupakshananda, (1995). Sāṅkhya Kārikā. ed. and trans., Madras: Sri Ramakrishna
Math.
Trenckner, R. V. (1983). Majjhima-nikāya. ed. vols. I-III., London: Pali Text Society.
von Hinuber, O. (1996). A Hand Book of Pali Literature. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Walshe, M. (1995). The Long Discourses of the Buddha, trans., Boston: Wisdom
Publication.
Warren, H. C. (1989). Visuddhimagga of Buddhaghosacarya. ed. HOS.
Woods, J. H. & Kosambi, D. (1977). Majjhimanikāya aṭṭhakathā (Papañcasūdanī), ed.
vol. I. London: Pali Text Society.
Website
Tipitaka: The Pali Canon (2013 November, 30,) http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/index.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Consent to Publish and Transfer of Copyright
By publishing in Prajñā Vihāra, the author agrees to transfer and assign to Assumption University of Thailand as the Publisher of the Journal, the copyright to the Article in any form, including any and all rights, interests and claims related to it.
The author does retain the following rights:
- The right to make further copies of the published article for their use in classroom teaching.
- The right to reuse all or part of the published article in a compilation of his or her own works or in textbooks of which they are the author or coauthor.
- The right to make copies of the published article for internal distribution within their academic institution.
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The Article is his or her original work, and has not been published previously and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
- It does not contain any matter that is obscene, libelous, or contrary to law.
- They have obtained the necessary license or written authority and paid any and all related fees for the use and reproduction of text, tables, illustrations and other copyrighted work from the owners of the intellectual property rights, and can furnish the Publisher copies of the license/written authority and proof of payment of related fees upon the signing of this Agreement.
- They have the consent of the Co-Authors of the article upon the signing of this Agreement.
- In the event that they intend to republish, reprint or translate all or part of the Article in other publications, they will secure the prior written permission from the journal Editor.
Prajñā Vihāra adopts the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) license
