Factors Impacting Online Learning Usage during Covid-19 Pandemic Among Sophomores in Sichuan Private Universities
Main Article Content
Purpose: This study aims to examine factors impacting online learning usage among students in Sichuan private universities, China. The variables used to construct the conceptual framework are perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, information quality, system quality, service quality, attitude towards using, satisfaction, behavioral intention and actual use. Research design, data and methodology: The quantitative approach (n=500) was conducted via online questionnaire, using judgmental sampling, quota sampling and convenience sampling. Before processing the data collection, content validity was reserved by index of item objective congruence (IOC). Pilot study of 40 samples was approved by Cronbach’s Alpha reliability test. Afterwards, the data was analyzed in SPSS using descriptive statistics, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM). Results: The results revealed that satisfaction had the strongest significant impact on behavioral intention, followed by perceived usefulness on attitude toward using, service quality on behavioral intention, behavioral intention on actual use, information quality on behavioral intention, perceived ease of use on attitude toward using and attitude toward using on behavioral intention. On the other hand, the relationship between system quality and behavioral intention was not significant. Conclusions: Academic practitioners were recommended to encourage online learning usage among students by developing better online learning system, technical support service and learning experience which led to successful adoption and learning effectiveness of students in higher education.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submitting author warrants that the submission is original and that she/he is the author of the submission together with the named co-authors; to the extend the submission incorporates text passages, figures, data, or other material from the work of others, the submitting author has obtained any necessary permission.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY What does this mean?). This is to get more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for you, the authors.
Adeyinka, T., & Mutula, S. (2010). A proposed model for evaluating the success of WebCT course content management system. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1795–1805.
Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour (2nd ed.). Open University Press.
Al-Adwan, A., Al-Alwan, A., & Smedley, J. (2013). Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning using Technology Acceptance Model in Jordanian universities. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 9(2), 4–18.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Bouchrika, I. (2020, June 30). 50 Online Education Statistics: 2020/2021 Data on Higher Learning & Corporate Training.Research.com. https://research.com/education/online-education-statistics#TOC2
Calli, L., Balcikanli, C., Calli, F., Cebeci, H. I., & Seymen, O. F. (2013). Identifying factors that contribute to the satisfaction of students in e-learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 85–101.
Champagne, E., & Granja, A. D. (2021). How the COVID-19 pandemic may have changed university teaching and testing for good. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/how-the-covid-19-pandemic-may-have-changed-university-teaching-and-testing-for-good-158342
Chao, C. M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(7), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652
Chiu, C. M., Chiu, C. S., & Chang, H. C. (2007). Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners’ satisfaction and Web-based learning continuance intention. Information Systems Journal, 17(3), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00238.x
Chuttur, M. (2009). Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, development and future directions. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37), 1-21.
Daghan, G., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2016). Modeling the continuance usage intention of online learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.066
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(78)90250-6
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitude. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Efiloğlu Kurt, Ö. (2019). Examining an e-learning system through the lens of the information systems success model: Empirical evidence from Italy. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1173–1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9821-4
Fagan, M. H., Neill, S., & Wooldridge, B. R. (2008). Exploring the intention to use computers: An empirical investigation of the role of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and perceived ease of use. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(3), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2008.11646019
Farahat, T. (2012). Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to Online Learning in the Egyptian Universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.012
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Freeze, R. D., Alshare, K. A., Lane, P. L., & Joseph Wen, H. (2010). IS success model in e-learning context based on students’ perceptions. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(2), 173.
Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
Hanif, A., Jamal, F. Q., & Imran, M. (2018). Extending the technology acceptance model for use of e-learning systems by digital learners. IEEE Access, 6, 73395–73404. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2881384
Hsu, L. (2021). What makes good LMOOCs for EFL learners? Learners’ personal characteristics and Information System Success Model. Computer Assisted Language Learning, (In press).
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 43(6), 740–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
Kuo, E. (2021, February 26). E-learning in Asia is on the rise: CDN is key to ensure stable and secure user experience. IABM. https://theiabm.org/e-learning-in-asia-is-on-the-rise-cdn-is-key-to-ensure-stable-and-secure-user-experience/
Lin, H. F. (2007). Measuring online learning systems success: Applying the updated DeLone and McLean model. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10(6), 817–820. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9948
Lin, P. C., Lu, H. K., & Liu, S. C. (2013). Towards An Education Behavioral Intention Model For E-Learning Systems: An Extension of UTAUT. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 47(3), 1120-1127.
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
Mok, K. H., Xiong, W., & Rahman, H. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic’s disruption on university teaching and learning and competence cultivation: Student evaluation of online learning experiences in Hong Kong. International Journal of Chinese Education, (In press).
Nair, A. (2021, August). Asia E-Learning Market. Allied Market Research. https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/asia-e-learning-market-A13093
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. R. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Pan, C. C., Sivo, S., Gunter, G., & Cornell, R. (2005). Students’ perceived ease of use of an eLearning management system: An exogenous or endogenous variable? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(3), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.2190/7M4G-R742-W9FT-JX1J
Pedroso, R., Zanetello, L., Guimaraes, L., Pettenon, M., Goncalves, V., Scherer, J., Kessler, F., & Pechansky, F. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the crack use relapse scale (CURS). Archives of Clinical Psychiatry, 43(3), 37-40.
Petter, S., & McLean, E. R. (2009). A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level. Information and Management, 46(3), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.12.006
Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15
Ramayah, T., & Lee, J. W. C. (2012). System characteristics, satisfaction and e-learning usage: A structural equation model (SEM). Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 196–206.
Ramayah, T., Ahmad, N. H., & Lo, M. C. (2010). The role of quality factors in intention to continue using an e-learning system in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5422–5426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.885
Saadé, R. G., & Kira, D. (2007). Mediating the impact of technology usage on perceived ease of use by anxiety. Computers and Education, 49(4), 1189–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.009
Sharma, G. P., Verma, R. C., & Pathare, P. (2005). Mathematical modeling of infrared radiation thin layer drying of onion slices. Journal of Food Engineering, 71(3), 282–286.
Sica, C. & Ghisi, M. (2007). The Italian versions of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory-II: Psychometric properties and discriminant power. In M.A. Lange (Ed.), Leading - Edge Psychological Tests and Testing Research (pp. 27-50). Nova
Sireci, S. G. (1998). Gathering and analyzing content validity data. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea0504_2
Siti, C., Md, L., Nur, L., Binti, D., Mohd, I., Afiq, D., & Tazilah, K. (2021). Application of Technology Acceptance Model (Tam) Towards Online Learning During Covid-19 Pandemic: Accounting Students Perspective. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 24(1), 13–20.
Sivo, S. A., Ku, C. H., & Acharya, P. (2018). Understanding how university student perceptions of resources affect technology acceptance in online learning courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2806
Soper, D. (n.d.). A priori sample size calculator for structural equation models. Free Statistics Calculators. https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calculator.aspx?id=89
Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067–2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005
Thongsri, N., Shen, L., & Bao, Y. (2019). Investigating factors affecting learner’s perception toward online learning: evidence from ClassStart application in Thailand. Behaviour and Information Technology, 38(12), 1243–1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1581259
Urbach, N., & Müller, B. (2012). The updated DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. In Y. K. Dwivedi, M. R. Wade, & S. L. Schneberger (Eds.), Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society (Vol. 1) (pp. 1–18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.141
Wu, J. H., & Wang, Y. M. (2006). Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean’s model. Information and Management, 43(6), 728–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.002
Xue, E., Li, J., & Xu, L. (2020). Online education action for defeating COVID-19 in China: An analysis of the system, mechanism and mode. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1821188
Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007). Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 1. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2(3), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465660710834453
Zhu, X., & Liu, J. (2020). Education in and After Covid-19: Immediate Responses and Long-Term Visions. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00126-3